By Plenary Sessions: Peeter Ernits

The speeches were delivered during the plenary session as the summer recess drew near. The speakers repeatedly referenced the necessity of holding emergency sessions during the summer break, which indicates an intense and irregular work pattern resulting from the processing of substandard legislation.

The speaker is active during the plenary session, making multiple interventions and posing repeated follow-up questions to the rapporteur in a short timeframe. Their pattern of activity demonstrates a focus on thoroughly examining the risk analysis and the implications of the legislation, patiently waiting for their turn to speak.

Insufficient data.

The speaker was highly active during the plenary session, taking the floor several times in succession to address two different draft bills and posing questions to the minister. He referenced recent contacts with both colleagues (Märt Otsa) and representatives of key legal institutions (the Chancellor of Justice), demonstrating active engagement outside the chamber. He is up-to-date on the legislative timetable for the bills, anticipating the adoption of the RAB law on Thursday.

The speaker is active during the plenary session, repeatedly asking questions to ministers (the Minister of the Interior, a minister) and making procedural motions within a short timeframe. The interventions focus on posing questions and demanding information. All appearances take place on a single day.

The speaker is active in the work of the Riigikogu, participating in the discussion and voting on several draft bills. He/She mentions attending a meeting of the Group for Making the State Budget Understandable, alongside the Chancellor of Justice, which demonstrates a commitment to reforming the budget process. He/She also refers to previous votes and upcoming events (the third reading next week).

The speaker actively participates in plenary sessions, raising critical questions about the effectiveness of accountability for high-ranking officials (such as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court). They engage in detailed discussions regarding legislative amendments, focusing on the technical substance of specific draft bills.

The speaker is active during the plenary session, participating in the Q&A and open microphone segments. He/She refers to his/her ongoing work as a member of the Rural Affairs Committee, where every week he/she hears narratives that directly contradict the government's optimism. He/She also mentions participating in a recent seminar concerning the birth rate.

The speaker is extremely active during the session, asking multiple questions and delivering one long, substantive speech in a short period. His/Her pattern of activity demonstrates a readiness to intervene in both procedural (call time) and substantive (wind turbines, scooters) debates. He/She actively participates in the Q&A rounds, demanding accountability and clarification.

The speaker is participating in the plenary session as the submitter of an interpellation, which points to their active role in carrying out the oversight function. He/She stresses that they have previously communicated and discussed the topic directly with beekeepers, and are thus familiar with their concerns and the internal communication issues within their organizations.