By Plenary Sessions: Peeter Ernits

The primary legislative focus is the opposition to a specific bill (likely the "super database"), which is deemed dangerous and is being processed at an unprecedented speed. Furthermore, there is an emphasis on the need to avoid extraordinary sessions during the summer recess, which are necessitated by poor-quality, or "junk laws."

The legislative focus is on security measures and assessing the risks associated with delays in the bill concerning the use of cameras. The speaker's role is that of a critical questioner who demands a thorough analysis of the consequences before the law is adopted, emphasizing the need to avoid delays of a month or two.

There is not enough data.

The legislative focus is on two bills: the Competition Act, which he supports as the best possible option, and the Money Laundering Data Bureau Act, which he demands be immediately scrapped, as it is extremely dangerous. He criticizes the government's fast-track procedure and its setting of priorities (RAB versus the Credit Information Act).

The legislative focus centers on criticizing the process surrounding the Waste Act, highlighting the years-long delays and inefficiency in preparing the draft bill. Another key issue is the expediency of amending the legislation, given that it is scheduled to be replaced soon by a major new war law, which stands in contrast to the current amendment work.

The speaker's primary priorities are ensuring constitutional compliance and preventing procedural errors (specifically regarding the draft legislation that resulted in EU fines). He/She is an active opponent of the supplementary budget, arguing that it is opaque and dangerous, in his/her estimation. While he/she supports the ratification of the Montreal Protocol, he/she considers it marginal.

The legislative priority is supporting the technical amendments bill, which introduces regulatory changes to the Preschool Education Act, the Education Act, and the Food Act. The speaker is a strong proponent of this bill, emphasizing its importance in ensuring the consistency of the laws and the well-being of children.

The speaker's focus is on political criticism and raising existential issues, rather than on specific legislative bills. He mentions his role as a member of the Rural Affairs Committee but does not describe any concrete legislative priorities or achievements.

The primary legislative priorities include restricting wind energy development, amending the environmental charges act, and regulating the local benefit instrument. Improving safety within the micro-mobility sector (scooters) is also a key focus. He/She tends to be an opponent or critic of the draft legislation, often highlighting the absence of impact assessments in the bills proposed by the opposition.

The main legislative priority is the draft Beekeeping Act, the existence and progression of which (following an alleged five-to-six-year delay) are being demanded from the Minister. The speaker supports the initiation and advancement of this legislation, believing it would bring greater benefit to the sector.