By Months: Jaak Aab
Total Months: 17
Fully Profiled: 17
10.2025
26 Speeches
The primary confrontation is with the government, with criticism focusing particularly on the ambiguous decisions made by the Minister of Education and Research and the budget policies of the Minister of Finance. This criticism is policy-driven, centering on the failure to deliver on promises and the creation of a budget deficit resulting from the abolition of the tax hump. Furthermore, the speaker defends the Social Democratic Party, refuting the accusations made concerning the motor vehicle tax.
09.2025
31 Speeches
Sharply criticizes the Centre Party for abandoning regional policy, labeling it a "municipal party." The speaker expresses skepticism regarding the government's nuclear energy plans, questioning whether the state is essentially "playing the lottery." A critical question is posed to the Prime Minister concerning the campaign aimed at reducing bureaucracy. The criticism is primarily policy-centric, rather than personal.
06.2025
35 Speeches
The speaker sharply criticizes the Reform Party and Eesti 200 over recent policy changes, accusing them of lacking principles and operating under the influence of lobbyists. They express strong opposition to amending the Competition Act in its current form, labeling the proposed changes as merely serving the interests of monopolies. Furthermore, the government is accused of disregarding expert recommendations regarding labor and tax policy.
05.2025
39 Speeches
He/She sharply criticizes the government formed by the Reform Party and Eesti 200, accusing them of weakening competition oversight and protecting the interests of large corporations. It is claimed that the government "punishes consumers and entrepreneurs with high prices." The text highlights the Reform Party's sluggishness in making energy decisions, specifically mentioning delays in maritime spatial planning and radar procurements. They demand the rejection of the draft legislation and greater transparency in decision-making processes.
04.2025
9 Speeches
Delivers sharp criticism of Isamaa’s energy policy, accusing them of inconsistency and "erratic policy." Cites specific examples of Isamaa’s previous decisions that harmed consumers (the universal service). The opposition is principled but focuses on the substance of the policy, not personal attacks.
03.2025
8 Speeches
The text criticizes the Reform Party for obstructing the draft competition law and directly questions why the Ministers of Justice (who are primarily Reform Party members) have been unable to resolve the issue. It expresses suspicion that certain businesses may be hindering the enhancement of competition oversight. At the same time, it maintains a constructive approach by seeking solutions.
01.2025
2 Speeches
There is no direct confrontation evident in the speeches. The speaker instead constructively acknowledges the problems, such as the unprofitability of oil shale power on the market, but avoids blaming specific parties. He emphasizes the necessity of keeping existing capacities operational until superior alternatives can be identified.
12.2024
12 Speeches
They are not expressing direct opposition, but they are noting the lack of support for the Isamaa faction's proposals within the Economic Affairs Committee concerning the mandatory audit thresholds. The approach is more constructive than confrontational, focusing on finding compromise solutions rather than attacking the opposition.
11.2024
20 Speeches
The criticism leveled at the Isamaa party regarding the delayed land tax reform is moderate, though it does accuse them of failing to meet their obligations for two decades. The counter-arguments presented are fact-based, drawing upon historical examples. The tone avoids sharp confrontation, favoring instead constructive criticism directed at political opponents.
10.2024
5 Speeches
It takes a forceful stance against the Moscow Patriarchate and its supporters, declaring them supporters of terrorism. It sharply criticizes Riigikogu members who do not take security issues seriously enough. The opposition is principled and uncompromising regarding security threats.
09.2024
2 Speeches
There is not enough data.
06.2024
4 Speeches
The speaker voices criticism against Priit Sibul, accusing him of misleading the public about the binding nature of the nuclear energy decision. He uses direct confrontation, asking, "Why are you trying to show..."—a move that demonstrates strong opposition to political manipulation. The criticism is primarily procedural and fact-based.
05.2024
33 Speeches
The primary opposition is directed against the activities of the Moscow Patriarchate and Patriarch Kirill, whom they label a war criminal and an inciter of aggression. They also criticize the inaction of previous governments regarding land valuation issues and the insufficient level of state investment during periods of crisis. The stance is principled, but avoids personal attacks.
04.2024
3 Speeches
It adopts a strongly oppositional stance toward the Moscow Patriarchate and Russia, declaring them a threat to public order in Estonia. The criticism is clearly ideological and security-based, ruling out any compromise with institutions supporting aggression. No direct opposition is evident in domestic political issues.
03.2024
8 Speeches
The criticism primarily targets the government's approach to cutting education spending, labeling the claims regarding excessive costs as "highly arbitrary and factually incorrect." They oppose the simplified restructuring of the school network, cautioning against the use of "Excel spreadsheets" and purely mechanical solutions. Regarding constitutional institutions, they criticize the executive branch being pressured via budgetary means.
02.2024
3 Speeches
The speaker consistently criticizes the government and ministers, especially for their inaction during the 2022 energy crisis. The criticism is primarily policy-focused, zeroing in on specific failures such as the universal service issue and deficiencies in economic policy. The attacks are measured but sustained.
01.2024
1 Speeches
A direct stance of opposition is not evident. Rather, it expresses concern about the system's shortcomings than offering direct criticism toward specific individuals or groups. The approach is constructive, not confrontational.