By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Aab

It adopts a categorically hostile position toward the Moscow Patriarchate and the Kremlin regime, labeling them terrorist and aggressive. It also sharply criticizes local religious associations that have failed to make substantive changes regarding their subordination to the Moscow Patriarchate. The opposition is principled and uncompromising, focusing on security threats and anti-state activity.

There is not enough data.

There is no direct criticism or confrontation expressed. Rather, it raises constructive questions about the government's activities and seeks explanations for resolving complex issues. The approach is cooperative, not confrontational.

The speaker avoids taking a direct opposition stance, instead voicing concern over the confusion within the government's communication. The criticism offered is constructive and focused on improving the clarity of communication, rather than being a political attack.

The speaker sharply criticizes the Reform Party and the justice ministers, accusing them of delay and a lack of clarity regarding the amendments to the Competition Act. He/She expresses suspicion that certain companies may be influencing the legislation in their own interests and obstructing the enhancement of competition supervision.

It refers to the "war against windmills" as an obstacle, but specific opponents are not named. It expresses moderate dissatisfaction regarding the delay in decisions, but maintains a constructive tone and seeks opportunities for cooperation.