By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Aab

It employs an official and argumentative style, relying on facts and legal grounds. The tone is decisive and cautionary, emphasizing threats to Estonian security. It balances emotional and logical arguments, utilizing both specific dates and documents, as well as a moral framework. The style is rather formal and structured, focusing on legal and political arguments.

Employs a formal, structured, and fact-based mode of address. The tone is neutral and information-focused, emphasizing procedural aspects and consensus-based decisions. The discourse is clearly organized in chronological sequence.

Uses a formal, analytical, and fact-based approach. The tone is constructive and collaborative, focusing on problem-solving. Arguments are structured logically, presenting the background first, followed by the problem, and finally posing a question about potential solutions.

The tone is polite and constructive, employing formal parliamentary language ("Honorable Speaker"). The style is inquisitive and analytically oriented, seeking to gain clarity regarding a complex situation without resorting to accusation or attack.

The speaker adopts a formally polite but critical tone. They begin with traditional expressions of courtesy and thanks, but then transition to sharp questions and accusations. The rhetoric relies on facts, using specific dates, amounts, and legal citations to strengthen the argument.

Adopts a polite and constructive approach, starting with expressions of gratitude and respect. Balances criticism with positive remarks ("we are largely in agreement on the big picture"). Poses specific questions and requires practical solutions, utilizing fact-based arguments.