By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Aab
Total Sessions: 83
Fully Profiled: 83
2025-11-10
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The main confrontation is with the current government coalition, whose actions are being called controversial and risky. The criticism is policy- and substance-based, focusing on the reduction of the gambling tax, the simplification of immigration procedures for cheaper labor, and the failure to support the VAT exemption for foodstuffs. It calls into question the prime minister's assurance that all risks have been mitigated, especially considering the warnings issued by the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU).
2025-11-06
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The criticism is aimed at political parties (including the coalition) for their political opposition, which is hindering the development of renewable energy. Politicians are also criticized for damaging investment confidence by constantly emphasizing the threat of war. Separately, the Minister of Finance is criticized for claiming that VAT does not affect the competitiveness of the economy.
2025-11-05
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Criticism is directed against the government, whose decisions regarding investment cuts are considered volatile and short-sighted. The opposition is both procedural and policy-based, focusing on the government's inability to maintain the planned investment trajectory in the face of budgetary difficulties.
2025-11-03
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Criticism is directed at the outcomes of the government’s policies, particularly the insufficient funding for social services and healthcare, which has resulted in the subsistence level lagging behind and longer waiting lists for specialist medical care. The opposition is policy- and results-based, accusing the system of shifting boundaries "at a snail's pace"—that is, far too slowly.
2025-10-22
XV Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The criticism is aimed at the internal disagreements and compromises within the governing coalition (the Reform Party and Eesti 200), which resulted in a solution that diverged from the majority position of the expert commission. The speaker suspects that the Reform Party insisted on the current form of the draft bill, thereby calling the coalition's decision-making process into question.
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the Minister of Finance, who is accused of inflexibility and refusing to acknowledge the negative impact of the VAT increase on economic competitiveness. The opposition's stance is strong and centers on a political choice that favors a simple tax hike over structural reforms.
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
While there is no direct opposition or personal criticism, the speaker calls into question the government’s initial positions on financing regional development. He asks for explanations as to why certain reform proposals (such as the proportions of the Electoral College) stalled at the party level, indirectly pointing to the presence of resistance.
2025-10-14
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-10-13
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
He/She opposes the ruling coalition's tax policy, especially regarding the permanent establishment of the VAT, highlighting the concerns of the agricultural sector. He/She also presents a rebuttal to attempts to blame all tax hikes on the Social Democrats, defending the party's position on taxing the wealthy. The criticism is policy- and substance-based.
2025-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The criticism is directed at the government’s communication and fiscal policy. Specifically, the government is criticized for dishonesty in explaining the objectives of the security tax (filling the budget deficit) and for using excessive fear-mongering to justify political steps. The size of the bureaucracy and the fragmentation of support measures are also criticized.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Criticism is aimed at the Minister of Finance and the Reform Party concerning their statements regarding VAT neutrality and their fear of a budget deficit. Also under fire are bureaucratic inertia and those who react negatively to the word "climate" in spatial planning. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on inefficiency and inaccurate economic statements.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The primary confrontation is with the government, which is being criticized for the tax policy choices made during the budget process, particularly for failing to consider lowering the VAT on foodstuffs. Criticism is also aimed at the reduction of corporate income tax, which is viewed as a step that undermines solidarity. The Social Democrats are also mentioned in connection with the previous general increase in VAT.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The criticism is aimed at right-wing governments and Estonian taxation dogmas, which have for years ignored IMF recommendations for broadening the tax structure. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the lack of structural reforms and the excessive proportion of indirect taxes.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The opposition's stance is directed at the government's fiscal policy, holding the abolition of the tax hump responsible for the budget deficit, an action estimated to have a negative impact of 500 million. The speaker dismisses attempts to pin the motor vehicle tax on the Social Democrats, clarifying SDE's actual taxation preference (luxury cars, registration fee).
2025-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
A direct stance of opposition is not evident; rather, constructive concern is voiced regarding the possible consequences of the government's fiscal policy. The criticism is policy-focused, not personal.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The text criticizes the government's lack of coordination between various ministries in its handling of African swine fever. The opposition's approach is systemic and procedural rather than personal, focusing instead on the inadequacy of the political measures taken.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Directly criticizes the Prime Minister and the government, accusing them of engaging in campaign-like activities and questioning the sincerity of their decisions. They are especially critical of the Reform Party's migration policy, expressing concern over the potential relaxation of the rules.
2025-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, plenary session.
There is not enough data.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
There is no direct opposition being shown; rather, it is constructive criticism regarding the ambiguity of the national education policy. Concern is expressed over the lack of clarity in the current policy, but there is no personal attack against the minister or the government.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
No direct opposition stance is evident. The speaker does not criticize other politicians or parties, but instead focuses on constructive questions regarding the implementation of the law.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
Moderately criticizes the minister's decision to choose a quicker, but legally questionable route instead of the standard planning process. It blames the sluggishness of government agencies in implementing these plans, citing the Soodla example.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Sharply criticizes the Centre Party for abandoning regional policy, labeling them a municipal party. Expresses skepticism regarding the government's nuclear energy plans, raising critical questions about the return on investment. The opposition is primarily focused on policy, not personalities.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Takes a clear stand against the Moscow Patriarchate, declaring it an institution that supports aggression. Criticizes the government's slow response on energy issues, demanding concrete solutions and timelines. Expresses doubts regarding the facts published in the media, but does so cautiously.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
A direct opposition stance is not evident—rather, it's constructive criticism and the raising of concerns. It does not attack personally, but focuses on systemic issues and funding questions.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The text sharply criticizes Minister Pakosta's actions, accusing her of banning officials from working on the matter and sabotaging the preparation of the draft legislation. It is claimed that intense lobbying and influence peddling occurred concerning the competition law. The role of the Bar Association is also criticized; it is treated as an expert body when it is merely an interest group. The opposition's critique is specific and personalized, focusing heavily on procedural violations.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker sharply criticizes the Reform Party and the Eesti 200 government, accusing them of hindering competition supervision and serving the interests of monopolistic enterprises. He/She expresses particularly strong criticism towards Liisa-Ly Pakosta and points to possible undue influence. The speaker calls upon members of the Reform Party to rediscover their former resolve and not support the current draft bill.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker directs sharp criticism at law firms, accusing them of lobbying for monopolistic enterprises and inciting litigation purely for personal gain. They also express doubt regarding the transparency of the minister and the political party Eesti 200 throughout the legislative process.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker sharply criticizes the Reform Party and Eesti 200, accusing them of making U-turns and demonstrating a lack of principles. He claims that Eesti 200 has consistently stalled the adoption of the competition law and that the bar association is lobbying in the name of specific interests. Criticism is also aimed at Kristen Michal's government, which is accused of governing purely for the sake of governing and prioritizing the retention of the prime minister's portfolio.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
Offers guarded criticism of Ministry of Justice officials, citing discrepancies between their public statements and their actual actions. The criticism is not personal, but procedural in nature, focusing on the lack of transparency and consistency in dealings with the European Commission.
2025-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
It directly criticizes the current government over its foreign labor policy, arguing that the policy fails to align with expert recommendations. The criticism is primarily political, focusing on the lowering of wage requirements and the potential negative impact this could have on productivity. Cooperation is not ruled out, but better planning and consideration are demanded.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Based on the limited data, it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding the opposition's stance.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
Due to the insufficiency of data, it is impossible to identify a specific opposition stance.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
They do not express direct opposition, but rather pose constructive questions aimed at clarifying government policy. They also voice indirect concern about the implementation of the long-term care reform, but instead of sharp criticism, they focus on seeking solutions to improve the situation.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is directly criticizing the government’s tax hike policy and budget reallocation decisions. The criticism is primarily policy-focused, centering on specific decisions concerning the raising of the value-added tax (VAT) and the redirection of Cohesion Fund money, rather than resorting to personal attacks.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Criticizes the Reform Party for "dragging its feet" in the energy sector, highlighting delays in maritime spatial planning and radar procurements. Expresses sharp opposition to the party that wishes to halt the development of wind energy, calling it a "Luddite movement." The criticism is primarily policy-based, not personal.
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
It does not express direct opposition to the cabinet's decision, but rather raises constructive questions regarding its implementation. The criticism is procedural rather than personal, focusing on the policy's impact on the education sector.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker directly criticizes "opponents of developing renewable energy capacity" and disputes claims regarding the low cost of oil shale electricity. He/She takes a clear stand against assertions that oil shale power is the cheapest, justifying this position by citing market regulations and CO2 taxes. The criticism is policy-centric rather than personal.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
No direct opposition is evident—the speaker poses a constructive question and references earlier cooperation with the government. No criticism is offered.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
Direct opposition is not evident—rather, constructive questions are being posed regarding the government's policy. There is no sharp criticism; instead, the focus is on seeking clarifications and concrete plans concerning the subsistence level and national defense issues.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
He moderately criticizes the government's slow reaction to the energy crisis, saying that "maybe they should have thought about it a little earlier." He refutes Urmas Reinsalu's accusations regarding the favoring of a single developer, defending the commission's objectivity. Overall, the criticism is constructive, not a sharp attack.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is no direct opposition or criticism expressed; the speaker instead poses a constructive question regarding the minister's policy without confrontation.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker sharply criticizes the current government formed by the Reform Party and Eesti 200, accusing them of stalling competition oversight and protecting the interests of big business. They assert that the government "punishes consumers and businesses with high prices" and supports "the large profits of tycoons." The criticism is principled and systemic, not personal.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
He generally criticizes all recent governments for insufficient energy planning, but avoids sharp personal attacks on a personal level. He notes that "everyone has a reason to look in the mirror." He expresses caution regarding the "big numbers" presented by Urmas Reinsalu (Isamaa), suggesting they might be intended to frighten the public.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker sharply criticizes Isamaa's energy policy, particularly their U-turn on renewable energy targets and the 2022 electricity market reform, which they claim cost people tens of millions of euros extra. They label Isamaa's policy "erratic" and demand an explanation for their previous support of the 100% target.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The text voices criticism regarding the Competition Authority's decision to consolidate the cartel agreement unit before the law takes effect. It also critiques the potential link to demands for cutting bureaucracy, but maintains a constructive tone, seeking explanations rather than assigning blame.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
It adopts a categorically hostile position toward the Moscow Patriarchate and the Kremlin regime, labeling them terrorist and aggressive. It also sharply criticizes local religious associations that have failed to make substantive changes regarding their subordination to the Moscow Patriarchate. The opposition is principled and uncompromising, focusing on security threats and anti-state activity.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
There is no direct criticism or confrontation expressed. Rather, it raises constructive questions about the government's activities and seeks explanations for resolving complex issues. The approach is cooperative, not confrontational.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker avoids taking a direct opposition stance, instead voicing concern over the confusion within the government's communication. The criticism offered is constructive and focused on improving the clarity of communication, rather than being a political attack.
2025-03-12
The 15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The speaker sharply criticizes the Reform Party and the justice ministers, accusing them of delay and a lack of clarity regarding the amendments to the Competition Act. He/She expresses suspicion that certain companies may be influencing the legislation in their own interests and obstructing the enhancement of competition supervision.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
It refers to the "war against windmills" as an obstacle, but specific opponents are not named. It expresses moderate dissatisfaction regarding the delay in decisions, but maintains a constructive tone and seeks opportunities for cooperation.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
There is not enough data.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The address does not express a direct opposition stance or criticism. The speaker merely mentions that two members of the committee were against placing the draft bill on the agenda and concluding the first reading, but the speaker does not adopt a clear opposing position himself.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
He rejected the Isamaa faction's proposals to raise the limits by 50%, but handled it diplomatically, explaining his reasoning. He refrained from personal attacks, choosing instead to focus on the substance of the arguments and the search for compromise.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is not enough information due to the lack of data.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
He avoids taking a direct oppositional stance, preferring instead to emphasize consensus on national defense issues, noting that "there are actually no disagreements on fundamental issues between the parties represented in the Riigikogu." He acknowledges the criticism directed at the state budget but approaches it constructively, stating that "some criticism has been voiced that can be objectively taken into consideration."
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker is leveling consistent and intense criticism against the Isamaa party, accusing them of two decades of broken promises and dodging responsibility. The criticism is aimed both politically and personally, focusing specifically on an individual (Urmas) and his party. There is no mention of compromise; instead, the speaker demands accountability.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
It does not express clear opposition to specific individuals or groups. Instead, it adopts a defensive stance against the criticism leveled at the Rail Baltic project, rejects the accusations of corruption, and disputes the need for an investigative commission. It maintains a diplomatic approach, urging the use of existing oversight mechanisms.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
It avoids expressing direct criticism toward specific individuals or political parties, focusing instead on explaining political choices. It acknowledges that tax policy is a "compromise agreement" and a "difficult topic," but refrains from attacking the opposition's positions. It maintains a constructive approach even when addressing critical issues.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
He/She sharply criticizes the Moscow Patriarchate as an institution and its leader, Patriarch Kirill, whom he/she labels a war criminal. He/She expresses strong opposition to Russian aggression and terrorism. Finally, he/she also criticizes members of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) who, in his/her opinion, do not take security issues seriously enough and are instead preoccupied with petty, day-to-day politics.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
A direct opposition stance is not evident. It mentions the questions raised by Mart Maastik and Tarmo Tamm regarding the thresholds, but does not adopt a critical position toward them. The focus is rather on constructive discussion than on opposition.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speech does not reveal a direct opposition stance or criticism aimed at specific opponents. Rather, concern is expressed about the efficiency of the system's operation.
2024-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
There is not enough data
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The speaker criticizes Priit Sibul's positions, accusing him of contradictory communication with the public. He challenges the assertion that the decision is not binding, yet simultaneously encourages the continuation of preparations. The criticism is procedural and substantive rather than personal, focusing instead on the clarity of political communication.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
There is not enough data.
2024-05-30
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
Instead of taking a sharply adversarial stance, the focus is rather on critically analyzing the actions of all political parties. It gently criticizes the current government for its handling of inflation and for cutting investments during the crisis. It stresses that "finger-pointing" among parties is unproductive, given that decisions were made under complex crisis conditions.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Sharply criticizes the central government for failing to fulfill its obligations in the field of land valuation, accusing the state of 20 years of negligence. The text is also critical of lawmakers, calling for them to take responsibility for these long-standing problems.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2024-05-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
No direct opposition was voiced. Rather, it criticized systemic problems such as bureaucracy, poor integration of databases, and a private sector that is unable to invest sufficiently in research and development. It mentioned external challenges, like the competitive edge provided by Germany's large aid packages.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
Covertly criticizes the previous government, referencing the "war of words" between the Minister of Finance, the Prime Minister, and the Office of the President, but does so diplomatically. It emphasizes that the president's reputation suffered "completely independently of him," demonstrating moderate criticism without direct attacks.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Directs sharp criticism toward the Moscow Patriarchate and Patriarch Kirill, labeling them as henchmen of the Russian regime. It criticizes their declaration of a "holy war" and their influence operations. At the same time, it emphasizes that the criticism is not aimed at ordinary believers or their religious practices.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main adversary is the Moscow Patriarchate as an institution and Patriarch Kirill personally, who is being called a war criminal. It sharply criticizes the Patriarchate’s justification of aggression and its call for a "holy war." The opposition is clearly political and security-based in nature, not anti-religious. It rules out compromise on the issue of the jurisdictional subordination of parishes associated with the Patriarchate.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
A direct opposition stance is not expressed. Instead, constructive criticism is offered regarding the situation ("things have gotten worse"), but at the same time, the minister's work is acknowledged ("thank you for your excellent work").
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The text avoids directing criticism at specific individuals or groups. Instead, it voices a systemic concern regarding the current healthcare structure, which compels people to shoulder higher out-of-pocket costs.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
The speaker offers moderate criticism of the executive branch's conduct toward constitutional institutions, particularly their tendency to "steamroll" or override them during the budget process. While referring to public accusations traded by both sides, the speaker avoids direct personal attacks, choosing instead to focus on solving systemic issues rather than engaging in confrontation.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
Due to the lack of data, it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding the opposition's stance.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Criticizes the "dogmatic" approach to cutting education costs and the assertion that significant sums of money could be found by reorganizing the school network to raise teachers' salaries. It also questions the use of "Excel spreadsheets" and mechanical solutions when planning the school network.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Sharp criticism is directed at the government and specifically the rapporteur, who served as a minister in 2022. The critique fundamentally targets the government's inaction during the energy price crisis, employing direct accusations ("there was no concrete plan whatsoever"). The confrontation is clearly policy-driven, focusing on the government's failure regarding response speed and effectiveness.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker isn't voicing direct opposition, but rather constructive criticism, expressing hope that the tax reform will bring more attention to underfunded sectors. The stance is supportive, but conditional.
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speech reveals no direct opposition, but rather constructive criticism concerning the flaws in the current education system. It does not attack specific individuals or parties, but focuses instead on identifying systemic problems.