By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Aab

There is not enough data.

He avoids taking a direct oppositional stance, preferring instead to emphasize consensus on national defense issues, noting that "there are actually no disagreements on fundamental issues between the parties represented in the Riigikogu." He acknowledges the criticism directed at the state budget but approaches it constructively, stating that "some criticism has been voiced that can be objectively taken into consideration."

The speaker is leveling consistent and intense criticism against the Isamaa party, accusing them of two decades of broken promises and dodging responsibility. The criticism is aimed both politically and personally, focusing specifically on an individual (Urmas) and his party. There is no mention of compromise; instead, the speaker demands accountability.

It does not express clear opposition to specific individuals or groups. Instead, it adopts a defensive stance against the criticism leveled at the Rail Baltic project, rejects the accusations of corruption, and disputes the need for an investigative commission. It maintains a diplomatic approach, urging the use of existing oversight mechanisms.

It avoids expressing direct criticism toward specific individuals or political parties, focusing instead on explaining political choices. It acknowledges that tax policy is a "compromise agreement" and a "difficult topic," but refrains from attacking the opposition's positions. It maintains a constructive approach even when addressing critical issues.