By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Aab

The main confrontation is with the current government coalition, whose actions are being called controversial and risky. The criticism is policy- and substance-based, focusing on the reduction of the gambling tax, the simplification of immigration procedures for cheaper labor, and the failure to support the VAT exemption for foodstuffs. It calls into question the prime minister's assurance that all risks have been mitigated, especially considering the warnings issued by the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU).

The criticism is aimed at political parties (including the coalition) for their political opposition, which is hindering the development of renewable energy. Politicians are also criticized for damaging investment confidence by constantly emphasizing the threat of war. Separately, the Minister of Finance is criticized for claiming that VAT does not affect the competitiveness of the economy.

Criticism is directed against the government, whose decisions regarding investment cuts are considered volatile and short-sighted. The opposition is both procedural and policy-based, focusing on the government's inability to maintain the planned investment trajectory in the face of budgetary difficulties.

Criticism is directed at the outcomes of the government’s policies, particularly the insufficient funding for social services and healthcare, which has resulted in the subsistence level lagging behind and longer waiting lists for specialist medical care. The opposition is policy- and results-based, accusing the system of shifting boundaries "at a snail's pace"—that is, far too slowly.