By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Aab
Total Sessions: 4
Fully Profiled: 4
2025-11-10
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The language used is formal, analytical, and critical, focusing on logical arguments and risk assessment. The tone is one of concern, particularly regarding the risks of gambling addiction and money laundering, and he/she employs factual references to commission discussions and officials' statements. He/she presents his/her position by highlighting questions and contradictions, thereby challenging the Prime Minister's confidence in mitigating those risks.
2025-11-06
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The style is formal and analytical, focusing on logical arguments and data to explain the causes and solutions of the economic recession. The speaker is persuasive, directly challenging the opposition (e.g., Rain's claims about renewable energy) and using the example of Lithuania to support national defense investments. He/She also acknowledges objections (e.g., disturbances caused by wind farms) but scientifically refutes them.
2025-11-05
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, beginning with an expression of gratitude to the Auditor General for his work. The address is structured as an analytical question which seeks a solution to the problem of budgetary instability, emphasizing logical consistency in the making of political decisions.
2025-11-03
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The rhetorical style is analytical, concerned, and questioning, relying on logical arguments and concrete data (e.g., inflation rates, a 2% increase in costs). The tone is formal and respectful, addressing the esteemed Chairman and Minister, while simultaneously emphasizing the urgency of the situation (queues, price hikes).