By Months: Urve Tiidus
Total Months: 18
Fully Profiled: 18
10.2025
7 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal and deferential, directly addressing the director and the minister. The tone is inquisitive and demands clarification, centering on the need to obtain logical, fact-based assurance regarding the budget's execution.
09.2025
13 Speeches
The discourse style is formal and analytical, concentrating on detailed questions and a comprehensive report on the commission's work. The tone is neutral and fact-based, continually seeking justifications (HLÜ regulation) and practical examples (food security). Logical appeals are employed, referencing physics and market logic when clarifying the diameter of the cable conduit.
06.2025
13 Speeches
The speaker's style is predominantly formal, neutral, and procedural, which is typical for the role of a commission rapporteur. Instead of emotional appeals, he employs logical arguments, grounding them in laws, protocols, and the official positions of civil servants. Personal opinions are rarely voiced, and they are always clearly separated from the commission's official stance, often emphasizing responsibility and development (e.g., the capacity for risk assessment).
05.2025
9 Speeches
The style is highly formal and procedural, constantly addressing the ministers ("Esteemed Chairman! Esteemed Minister!"). The speaker relies heavily on logical arguments, utilizing statistics and international forecasts (e.g., the World Economic Forum). The tone is analytical and inquisitive, aiming to emphasize the significance and future impact of the topics, while remaining neutral.
04.2025
7 Speeches
The rhetorical style is highly formal and respectful, repeatedly addressing the ministers, the chairman, and the Chancellor of Justice. The speaker poses analytical and well-considered questions, often highlighting the two sides of the issues (positive progress versus reduced privacy) as well as future-oriented existential choices. The tone is logical and concerned, particularly regarding cybersecurity and AI.
03.2025
2 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal and interrogative, respectfully addressing the chairman, the prime minister, and the presenter alike. The focus is placed on logical argumentation and the clarification of statistical data, while emotional appeals are avoided. Questions are aimed at forecasting specific trends and eliciting detailed information.
02.2025
7 Speeches
The rhetorical style is highly formal and procedural, strictly adhering to parliamentary etiquette ("Esteemed Chairman! Esteemed Minister!"). The speaker focuses on facts, the substance of the draft legislation, and requesting specific data, favoring analytical questions that require metrics (such as efficiency or procedural streamlining) or statistics. The delivery is neutral and businesslike, avoiding emotional appeals.
01.2025
4 Speeches
The rhetorical style is highly formal and respectful, repeatedly employing salutations such as "Esteemed Chairman" and "Esteemed Minister." The speaker poses pointed, yet logical questions, focusing on demanding specific data and figures, and scrutinizing the precise wording of legislation. Emotional appeals are entirely absent; the emphasis remains strictly on rational and procedural criticism.
12.2024
10 Speeches
The rhetorical style is highly formal, procedural, and interrogative, frequently employing polite forms of address ("Esteemed Chairman! Esteemed Minister/Rapporteur!"). The speaker poses logical and fact-based questions, concentrating on clarifying mechanisms, accountability, and risk mitigation. Emotional appeals are absent; the focus is strictly on the clarity of details and regulations.
11.2024
6 Speeches
The rhetorical style is highly formal and courteous, consistently employing the salutations "esteemed Chairman" and "esteemed Presenter." The speaker primarily raises analytical and practical questions, focusing on logical arguments, measurability, and the assessment of financial viability. The tone is neutral and seeks clarity, deliberately avoiding emotional appeals.
10.2024
6 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal and deferential, employing titles such as "esteemed chairman/presenter/minister," yet simultaneously remains sharp and interrogative. The speaker concentrates on logical arguments, requiring clarification regarding accountability and oversight. He recognizes the social and moral equilibrium issues related to hiring individuals with criminal records, noting that these are contentious points.
09.2024
5 Speeches
The rhetorical style is highly formal and respectful, repeatedly employing the salutations "Respected Chairman/Minister/Chancellor of Justice." The tone is analytical and interrogative, focusing on logical arguments and data (tables, graphs, reports). The speaker frequently requests brief summaries, justifications, and hypothetical assumptions regarding the impact of legislation, while strictly avoiding emotional appeals.
06.2024
5 Speeches
The speaker’s rhetorical style is highly formal and respectful, consistently addressing the esteemed Chair and colleagues. The tone is analytical and informative, particularly when communicating the decisions of the Environment Committee. Logical arguments and concrete examples (e.g., the Hellenurme water mill) are employed to illustrate legislative problems, while emotional appeals are avoided.
05.2024
9 Speeches
The rhetorical style is highly formal and deferential, repeatedly employing the addresses, "Esteemed Chairman!" and "Esteemed Minister!". The speaker primarily poses questions aimed at clarifying specific details and evaluating the potential consequences of implementing the proposed legislation. The tone is analytical and logical, focusing on the mechanics of policy and the underlying facts.
04.2024
3 Speeches
The rhetorical style is extremely formal and deferential, repeatedly employing the addresses "Esteemed Chair" and "Esteemed Presenter." The speaker presents their viewpoints in the form of questions, which are logical, specific, and directly related to the content of the presentation. The tone is analytical and information-seeking, strictly avoiding emotional appeals.
03.2024
10 Speeches
The rhetorical style is highly formal and procedural, constantly employing terms of courtesy ("Esteemed Chairman," "Honorable Minister"). The speaker primarily poses analytical and practical questions regarding policy execution and solution development, while maintaining a neutral and professional tone. Emotional or personal appeals are absent; the focus remains strictly on facts and procedures.
02.2024
4 Speeches
The tone is generally formal, analytical, and questioning, addressing esteemed colleagues and ministers. It poses both existential questions (how to convince people that good will prevail) and pragmatic, detailed explanations regarding the content of the legal amendments. It uses logical appeals to justify the pragmatism and reasonableness of the legal amendments.
01.2024
10 Speeches
The speaker's style is highly formal, courteous, and analytical, repeatedly employing the addresses, "Esteemed Chairman/Rapporteur/Minister." Emphasis is placed on logical argumentation, procedural precision, and constructive questioning, while strictly avoiding emotional appeals. The lengthy overview speech incorporates citations from vision documents and concludes with a lyrical digression featuring a historical example (the Code of Hammurabi).