By Plenary Sessions: Urve Tiidus

The language used is formal and respectful, addressing both the chairperson and the guest. The style is inquisitive and analytical, focusing on a logical comparison between the regulatory concerns of Estonia and those of other countries. The tone is measured, and the objective is to obtain additional factual information.

The language employed is formal, explanatory, and logic-based, focusing specifically on the technical content of legislative amendments and directives. Detailed legal and professional terminology is used instead of emotional or personal appeals, serving to clarify the objectives and substance of the proposed regulation. The overall tone is objective and pragmatic.

The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, utilizing direct addresses to the Minister and the Chairman of the Commission. The tone is serious and concerned, centering on the public’s "existential worry." The speaker employs questions to challenge the officials, requesting that they clarify how the rules-based order is maintained in reality and how a sense of security can be established.