By Plenary Sessions: Rain Epler

The speaker is acting on behalf of the EKRE parliamentary group, proposing that the draft legislation be rejected. Their style is confrontational, focusing primarily on opposing the government's actions. There are no indications of a willingness to compromise or engage in cross-party cooperation regarding the bills under discussion.

Insufficient information. The speaker is acting antagonistically, focusing on criticizing institutions and opponents instead of cooperating.

Data unavailable.

There is no evidence of cooperation; instead, the style is confrontational and critical, casting doubt on the legitimacy of most of the actions taken. A reference is made to the response given to Seeder, suggesting an awareness of the questions raised by other members, but not indicating any cross-party collaboration.

The speaker does not point to direct cooperation with other Riigikogu factions. Instead, he positions himself as the advocate for the views of interest groups ignored by the government (Eesti Energia, Estonian Gas Association). A willingness to compromise is not evident; rather, the emphasis is placed on the necessity of correcting the government’s mistakes.

The speaker operates in cooperation with colleagues, mentioning that the inquiry was submitted "together with colleagues," which indicates intra-factional cooperation in the exercise of parliamentary oversight. There are no references to seeking non-governmental or cross-party compromises.

Not enough data.

The style of collaboration is open and respectful, actively seeking advice and historical context from an experienced colleague ("dear Jüri"). The speaker asks the addressee to share both parliamentary practice and their personal view on the situation, demonstrating a readiness for dialogue.

The speaker demonstrates cooperation with colleagues by continuing and further developing questions presented by other Riigikogu members (colleague Kunnas). They also agree with colleague Leo's viewpoint concerning the impracticality of obtaining the Environmental Board's consent during a state of war.

The speaker acknowledges the consensus regarding aid to Ukraine but stresses the necessity of prioritizing Estonia's security and resilience. Reference is made to the previous bank tax bill put forward by EKRE and the Centre Party, which demonstrates a willingness to advance certain bills regardless of the original proposer.