By Plenary Sessions: Rain Epler

The speaker is highly active during the plenary session, submitting repeated questions and formal inquiries to several ministers over the course of a single day. He is persistent in demanding answers, and also draws attention to the procedural rules governing the session and the time limits for ministerial replies.

He submitted a query to the Governor of the Bank of Estonia, specifically noting the record speed of the response. His pattern of activity centers on intensely questioning the leaders of the government and independent institutions during plenary sessions.

The speaker participated in the discussion following the presentation at the plenary session, both asking questions and delivering a longer explanatory address that focused on technical details and public education. This pattern of activity demonstrates a readiness to intervene in debates where they perceive demagoguery or factual errors.

According to the data, the action is confined solely to the question and criticism raised during the parliamentary plenary session concerning voting procedures. This constitutes an intervention driven by the handling of a specific draft law and the procedural decisions associated with it.

The speaker is active during the session, presenting on multiple draft bills and repeatedly requesting additional time, which indicates a desire to address the topics thoroughly. They are attentive to the speeches of other colleagues, later inquiring about their content.

The speaker is actively involved in parliamentary oversight, having submitted a formal query (interpellation) back on January 17th and following up on the response during the sitting. They participate in the debate repeatedly, posing the initial question as well as two supplementary questions to the minister, focusing specifically on issues of oversight and funding.

The speaker is highly active during the plenary session, raising questions and making statements concerning multiple agenda items and ministers in a short timeframe. They intervene with both substantive queries and procedural points of order, demonstrating a high level of responsiveness.

The pattern of activity indicates participation in a plenary session where a question is raised regarding an item on the agenda. The speaker references obtaining information via the media (newspapers), which points to the use of external sources when learning about parliamentary practices.

The speaker was active during the plenary session, posing three consecutive and substantively related questions during the debate on a single draft bill. All remarks were made on the same day, indicating intensive participation in the discussion of that specific topic.

The patterns of activity demonstrate active participation in the information session, repeatedly posing questions to the Prime Minister regarding both the progress of legislation and decisions concerning national security. The speaker is also prepared to intervene on matters of procedural questions and maintaining order.