By Plenary Sessions: Rain Epler
Total Sessions: 131
Fully Profiled: 131
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
Information regarding cooperation is limited, but the speaker cites the views of colleague Maran to highlight their disagreement. They present specific amendments (e.g., allowing industrial facilities in areas with depleted resources) and call on the minister to withdraw the bill, which suggests a confrontational rather than a compromise-oriented approach.
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The speaker emphasizes the need for international cooperation, recommending that Estonia team up with Poland. The goal of this cooperation is to secure a joint exemption from the migration pact quotas and to work together toward reducing the obligations arising from climate targets.
2025-10-13
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker is prepared to support the bills put forward by their opposition colleagues (the Social Democrats)—specifically, the reduction of VAT on foodstuffs. However, this support is delivered critically, highlighting the Social Democrats' past hypocrisy and their history of voting against similar proposals. There is a complete absence of any attempt to cooperate or seek compromise with the coalition; the government is instead viewed as a force imposing a "dictate."
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The style of interaction is predominantly confrontational, focusing primarily on criticizing the government and its coalition partners. A rare commendation was noted for the social democrat regarding the Võro language issue, but other conservative forces were sharply criticized for their ideological uncertainty concerning matters of the green transition.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The collaboration style is purely oppositional and critical, focusing on calling into question the actions and motives of government and commission representatives. There is no mention of cooperation, readiness to compromise, or bipartisan activity.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation tends to be confrontational and critical, focusing on analyzing the behavior and style of the minister and members of the Reform Party. There are no indications of seeking compromises, but attempts are made to elicit personal opinions from colleagues, noting that members of the Reform Party are not in the habit of sharing them.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
Insufficient data.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The cooperation style is primarily confrontational and challenging, directing criticism and admonishments straight at colleagues (e.g., Andres). The speaker questions the suitability of a government minister to serve as the rapporteur for the dialogue between the Riigikogu (Parliament) and the Academy of Sciences. No direct cooperation or willingness to compromise with other parties is evident from the speeches.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker actively collaborates with their fellow parliamentary group members, submitting joint interpellations and legislative drafts (e.g., together with Martin Helme to the Governor of the Bank of Estonia). This cooperation is clearly intra-opposition and aimed at scrutinizing the government's activities. There are no indications of a readiness to seek compromises with the coalition or to act across party lines.
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The approach to collaboration is confrontational and critical toward the government. It shows a readiness to support the draft legislation of other opposition parties (e.g., Isamaa) if those bills are aimed at correcting the government's mistakes (the example being ESG reporting).
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker stresses the importance of consultation when introducing draft legislation, particularly among opposition parties, noting that this is a standard procedure. He is attempting to predict the voting patterns of other parties (the Social Democrats) to gauge the actual level of support for the bill.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is caucus-centric, as the speaker proposes to suspend the proceedings on behalf of their own caucus. There is no evidence of cooperation or readiness to compromise with other parties; rather, the emphasis is placed on confrontation with the coalition.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker demonstrates a readiness to cooperate on specific legislative objectives, explicitly supporting the Isamaa party's proposal to abolish the ESG reporting requirement. The remainder of the communication is predominantly focused on challenging and criticizing the government's actions.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
While expecting the coalition to vote down the opposition’s draft legislation, [he/she] remains open to cooperation on improving the bills via amendments (for example, concerning the ERJK reform). [He/She] points to widespread, private, cross-party consensus regarding the ERJK issue, calling on coalition members of parliament to reflect and offer their support.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
Insufficient data.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker constantly offers advice to colleagues, particularly regarding energy and economic issues, but feels that this help falls on deaf ears (describing the situation as "running headfirst into a brick wall"). The speaker asks the Chair of the Finance Committee (Annely) to prepare a consolidated document detailing the impact of changes to the tax burden, in order to ensure that both parliament members and the public are better informed.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Information is lacking. The speeches presented focus entirely on criticizing the government and holding it accountable, with no references to cooperation or a willingness to compromise.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The politician primarily focuses on sharply criticizing the policies of the coalition and officials, questioning their rationality and the validity of their data, while labeling opposing viewpoints as absurd, perverse, or naive. He submitted a proposal seeking an exemption from the CO2 quota, stressing the necessity of cooperating with neighboring countries (Latvia, Lithuania, Poland) during negotiations with the European Commission. However, he expressed little confidence in receiving support from the coalition. The only positive cross-party acknowledgment was reserved for Hanah Laht (from the coalition) for thinking along the right lines.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The speaker emphasizes the need for pragmatic, cross-party regional cooperation in Southeast Estonia, sharply contrasting this approach with decisions made strictly along party lines or via personal connections. They call for viewing Southeast Estonia as a unified stronghold, urging communities not to compete amongst themselves (or 'pull the blanket from one another'), thereby preventing resources from concentrating in Tallinn.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
It refuses to show willingness to cooperate with the coalition, demanding instead that the bill's proceedings be terminated. It calls on its opposition partners to be more principled and not to get caught up in the 'hype' surrounding renewable energy development.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is prepared for pragmatic cooperation, even if it means the coalition adopts the opposition's good ideas and presents them as their own. He communicates directly with colleagues (Mario, Martin), acknowledging their expertise, but challenging their ideological stances. He emphasizes the need to create a framework that ensures a level playing field for entrepreneurs, rather than directing the flow of money into the pockets of a select few.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The collaborative style is predominantly critical, yet it acknowledges the valid points made by colleagues (Kadastik), utilizing these points to reinforce its own stance. A cross-party consensus on issues of island operation and security is highlighted, even though the coalition's actions regarding security funding are criticized.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
Not enough data.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Acknowledges cooperation within the opposition, although political competition is also noted. Regarding working with the coalition, [he/she/it] is pessimistic, citing "the mathematics of the Riigikogu chamber," but does not entirely lose hope that consensus could emerge on some issues. The previous time in government is described as a period where vigorous efforts were made to improve people's livelihoods.
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is open to cooperation with the opposition (the Social Democrats) regarding the repeal of the car tax, but remains skeptical of their sincerity. Coalition partners are also urged to support establishing the framework for a bank tax, emphasizing that this would be a sensible move for the state in the long term. Cooperation is conditional and focuses on specific draft legislation.
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
There is insufficient data regarding the style of cooperation, the willingness to compromise, or cross-party collaboration.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There are no references to cooperation with other political parties; rather, emphasis is placed on the party's unified stance (e.g., there are two sexes), contrasting with the government's positions. Communication with the minister is demanding and critical, requiring a clear answer to unanswered questions.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
Not enough data
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
There is not enough data.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data. The speaker only mentions the colleague to contrast their recent question with the speaker's own proposal for reducing bureaucracy, which doesn't suggest any collaboration.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speeches contain no reference whatsoever to cooperation or willingness to compromise; the focus is entirely on dissolving the coalition and demanding snap elections.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is no information regarding cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-party activity; the style is purely confrontational and focuses on holding government members accountable.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker adopts a purely oppositional and confrontational style, questioning the coalition's motives and demanding a change in direction. There is absolutely no indication of cooperation or willingness to compromise.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The approach to cooperation is centered on strengthening anti-government positions, citing corridor conversations among coalition partners' party members and general dissatisfaction with the government's performance. This indicates the use of informal channels for criticizing the administration. There are no signs of seeking compromise with the government.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The cooperation style is open and information-seeking, demonstrated by turning to a colleague, praising them for their thoroughness, and requesting assistance in educating themselves on the topic of IBRD. This signals a readiness for constructive collaboration and knowledge sharing among members of the Riigikogu.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates swift and pragmatic collaboration with their colleague ("Anti") in resolving procedural matters, ensuring that the critical topic is addressed. This suggests a readiness for in-chamber coordination.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The speaker is open to discussion, but cooperation with the coalition is adversarial. He calls on coalition members to support the opposition's initiatives (a reduction in VAT), stressing that this is necessary to help the people, and warns the Social Democrats against playing "the game."
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The speaker is not demonstrating a willingness to cooperate; instead, they are urging the minister to be brave and defy the coalition's policy in order to improve the public's standard of living. Their style is confrontational and demands independent action from the minister.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker is taking part in a lively debate with colleagues (specifically Aivar and Kruuse) and the presenter (Urmas), though his political stance remains oppositional. He appeals directly to the farmers themselves, urging them to reflect on the independence of their representative body from the state, emphasizing the necessity of strong cooperation within the sector.
2025-01-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker strongly endorses the issues raised by colleagues and speaks on behalf of the opposition, citing a shared understanding regarding the detrimental nature of the government’s policies. No willingness to cooperate with the government is expressed; rather, emphasis is placed on the necessity of a complete reversal of the current policy. He/She notes that even members of the ruling party are criticizing the government’s actions, effectively playing the role of an internal opposition.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
They do not support the current coalition, calling on the Prime Minister to remove the Social Democrats from the coalition and initiate new negotiations. At the same time, they emphasize that politics is the art of compromise, hinting at a willingness for new political agreements, provided the obstacles are removed.
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker addresses colleagues directly (specifically mentioning "Evelin, dear colleague"), seeking information regarding the committee discussions and urging them to share their personal understanding of the principles of transparency. This demonstrates a readiness for dialogue and a willingness to deepen the discussion within the Riigikogu.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is little information regarding cooperation, but the sharing of ideas with other Riigikogu members is mentioned (the idea of assisting families with children). In the current context, the style is rather confrontational, but he/she acknowledges the change in the Prime Minister’s tone regarding energy, seeing this as hope for a move towards normalcy.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the need for cooperation but criticizes the government for its absence, highlighting the contradiction between the minister’s call for collaboration and his actual behavior. He demands that parliamentary parties be treated with respect and that their positions be taken into account. The willingness to cooperate is conditional and depends entirely on the government’s conduct.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
He speaks positively of opposition colleagues (Reinsalu, Laats) and experts in certain fields (Aivar Sõerd), supporting their stances on budgetary matters. He directly addresses coalition MPs (Hanah Lahe, Züleyxa Izmailova) to highlight the hypocrisy of their positions regarding the green transition, which serves more as a rhetorical challenge than an offer of cooperation.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is not enough data.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Information regarding the desire for cooperation is lacking; the speaker focuses instead on casting doubt on the opposing side's arguments and actions. The second speech alludes to political maneuvering by changing the coalition, rather than aiming for compromise.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
Insufficient data.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
They operate actively within the faction, submitting specific amendment proposals in collaboration with Martin Helme and Kert Kingo. They pragmatically acknowledge that the coalition drew inspiration from their proposal (the mandatory requirement for structuring/segmentation), but criticize the coalition's refusal to approve the proposal outright.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
Speeches highlight the strong opposition resistance during the ratification of the International Labour Organization convention in the Riigikogu, suggesting internal cooperation within the opposition bloc. There is no information available regarding any openness to compromise or willingness for cross-party collaboration.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker’s style is rather confrontational and interrogative; they focus on highlighting disagreements and challenging opponents’ viewpoints. The reference to previous cooperation (with Jaak Aab in government) is negative, emphasizing Aab’s subsequent change of stance. Openness to compromise or cross-party cooperation is not reflected in the speeches.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Information regarding cooperation is lacking; the speaker focuses instead on the critical analysis of the actions and arguments of other parties (the commission, Isamaa). He demands transparency and a high-quality discussion, referencing an earlier position held by Toomas Kivimägi.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
Information is scarce. The statement is a direct challenge to the government, not an offer of cooperation.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is no indication of cooperation, readiness to compromise, or bipartisan action. The speaker’s position is purely scrutinizing and confrontational, calling into question the motives and consistency of the government’s actions.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is conditional and demanding; the speaker demands that coalition partners agree to disenfranchise the citizens of the aggressor state. There are no references to broad-based cooperation or the search for compromise; instead, the political and moral responsibility of the opponents is emphasized.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
There is insufficient data available. The speaker is primarily engaged in criticizing the government and demanding answers from the prime minister.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker pointed to cooperation with other factions, expressing satisfaction with the Center Party’s support for the bank tax bill and noting that the Social Democrats had also initially supported the idea. This demonstrates a willingness to consolidate support for specific economic policy initiatives within the opposition.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker mentions cooperation with "colleagues" when submitting the interpellation. Although the style is confrontational, he "benevolently" offers Minister Ligi a suggestion regarding his case: listen to the session recording and find the courage to apologize. There are no references to broader cross-party compromise or cooperation in shaping policy.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker referred to cooperating with colleagues when submitting inquiries and is open to compromise, provided the Minister of Finance supports his proposal to make the itemization of economic costs mandatory. On behalf of the faction, he proposes rejecting the draft bill.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker's style is predominantly confrontational, and they emphasize the independent success of the opposition's actions (the postponement of the tax hump, the withdrawal of the bill). There are no signs indicating cooperation or compromise; rather, the focus is on exposing the government's mistakes and obstructing their activities.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is no direct cooperation visible with other political parties, but the calls are directed at the Speaker of the Riigikogu, demanding that a memorandum be sent to the government to correct the legislative procedure. The oversight function regarding the government dominates, rather than the search for compromises.
2024-10-09
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.
Not enough data
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
There is no information regarding their willingness to cooperate with other members of the Riigikogu; the focus is entirely on holding the executive branch accountable. The speaker mentions the government's need to consult with NATO partners, but this is a political requirement, not the speaker's personal cooperation style.
2024-10-08
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker references a question previously brought up by their colleague (Aivar Kokk). This indicates awareness and the potential for shared concerns within the faction or among a group holding similar interests.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient data. The speeches focus on criticizing the government's actions and demanding answers from the minister.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
Information is lacking. The speaker interacts with the other parties (the minister, the rapporteur, the session chair) primarily from a position of offering criticism and posing questions; there are no indications of cooperation or the seeking of compromises.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Information regarding the readiness for cooperation is lacking; the speaker represents the faction's position and proposes suspending the second reading of the draft bill. Attention is drawn to the passivity and lack of knowledge among the coalition deputies, which points to a lack of cooperation.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The style of cooperation is evident in marking a joint opposition with colleague Timpson regarding the progressive income tax, confirming widespread resistance to the minister's ideas within the chamber. The data does not indicate any openness to compromise or broad cross-party cooperation.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
There is too little data.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
The speaker references themes previously touched upon by Martin Helme, indicating a unity of position with his faction colleagues and a shared critical line regarding the government. There is no data suggesting a readiness for compromise or inter-party cooperation.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The cooperation style is clearly factional, as the speaker is acting "on behalf of the faction" and "under Martin's mandate," indicating strong internal factional backing. Information regarding inter-party cooperation or readiness to compromise is absent.
2024-07-29
The 15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu.
Insufficient data.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
There is not enough data.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
There is no evidence of willingness to cooperate or compromise; the speaker’s position is purely oppositional and questioning, focusing on calling into question the government's actions and intentions.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Information regarding willingness to cooperate is missing; the speaker focuses exclusively on criticizing the coalition's actions and antagonism. He is skeptical of the coalition's claims that the discussion remained strictly on topic, and is looking for evidence of hidden tax intentions.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The speaker is acting as a member of the EKRE parliamentary group and supports their proposed amendment concerning a state majority stake in the nuclear power plant. They show no willingness to compromise on energy policy, calling the opposition’s offer a "Reform Party compromise" and urging a vote against the law.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker emphasized the EKRE faction’s unified and clear opposition to the car tax. While the tone toward the coalition remains confrontational, he commended one coalition representative from Võrumaa who had dared to "crawl out of the hole," noting how rarely praise is directed at the opposing side.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The speaker referred to the questions raised by other colleagues (Vooglaid, Kadastik) and the work of the committee, demonstrating his involvement in internal parliamentary structures. At the same time, he expressed dissatisfaction with the parliamentary format, which prevents direct debate with colleagues present in the chamber, citing a desire to "ping-pong" (to engage in a rapid back-and-forth).
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker represents the views of their faction (EKRE), proposing that the draft legislation be rejected and consulting with colleagues regarding the controversial aspects of the bill. In the energy debate, they seek to establish cross-party cooperation, representing "all members of the Riigikogu who favor a common-sense energy policy."
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
We lack sufficient information regarding the cooperation style because his appearances focus on opposition and criticism, even though he references the questions posed by other colleagues (Vooglaid).
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is no data on willingness to cooperate or compromise with other politicians.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
No data is available regarding the willingness to cooperate or compromise.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There are no direct references to cooperation or willingness to compromise, as the speeches are focused on expressing dissent. The speaker refers to those who asked questions previously, indicating a certain shared concern with other members of the opposition.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
Cooperation is evident within the faction, referencing the jointly submitted draft bill concerning the bank tax. When engaging with debate partners (e.g., colleague Tamm), communication begins with partial agreement, but a strong counter-argument is subsequently presented. There are no references to cross-party cooperation.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
No data available
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Insufficient data.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker is acting on behalf of the EKRE parliamentary group, proposing that the draft legislation be rejected. Their style is confrontational, focusing primarily on opposing the government's actions. There are no indications of a willingness to compromise or engage in cross-party cooperation regarding the bills under discussion.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient information. The speaker is acting antagonistically, focusing on criticizing institutions and opponents instead of cooperating.
2024-04-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Data unavailable.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
There is no evidence of cooperation; instead, the style is confrontational and critical, casting doubt on the legitimacy of most of the actions taken. A reference is made to the response given to Seeder, suggesting an awareness of the questions raised by other members, but not indicating any cross-party collaboration.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker does not point to direct cooperation with other Riigikogu factions. Instead, he positions himself as the advocate for the views of interest groups ignored by the government (Eesti Energia, Estonian Gas Association). A willingness to compromise is not evident; rather, the emphasis is placed on the necessity of correcting the government’s mistakes.
2024-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The speaker operates in cooperation with colleagues, mentioning that the inquiry was submitted "together with colleagues," which indicates intra-factional cooperation in the exercise of parliamentary oversight. There are no references to seeking non-governmental or cross-party compromises.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Not enough data.
2024-04-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of collaboration is open and respectful, actively seeking advice and historical context from an experienced colleague ("dear Jüri"). The speaker asks the addressee to share both parliamentary practice and their personal view on the situation, demonstrating a readiness for dialogue.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates cooperation with colleagues by continuing and further developing questions presented by other Riigikogu members (colleague Kunnas). They also agree with colleague Leo's viewpoint concerning the impracticality of obtaining the Environmental Board's consent during a state of war.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker acknowledges the consensus regarding aid to Ukraine but stresses the necessity of prioritizing Estonia's security and resilience. Reference is made to the previous bank tax bill put forward by EKRE and the Centre Party, which demonstrates a willingness to advance certain bills regardless of the original proposer.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
The speaker demonstrates solidarity with other members of the Riigikogu (colleagues Aller and Solman) by defending their right to ask questions against criticism from the presiding officer. This shows a willingness to support colleagues on procedural matters.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The collaborative style is open, as the speaker refers to an earlier question posed by another colleague (Ossinovski), demonstrating awareness and a potential shared concern about the issue. This suggests a willingness to acknowledge the contributions of others in framing the discussion topic.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The presenter is prepared to recognize the Riigikogu Board's actions regarding the timing of the interpellation and commend the Minister for a specific response that suggests a pragmatic communication style. At the same time, the stance on the core issues remains investigative and critical, seeking a format through which to ascertain the source of the opponent's knowledge.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
The speaker is participating in a debate with colleagues, correcting a colleague's line of argument regarding totalitarian assumptions, but doing so good-naturedly. The discussion primarily involves asking the presenter for clarification on legislative details. Data concerning bilateral or inter-party cooperation is absent.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Information regarding cooperation is unavailable; the speeches delivered are aimed at criticizing the leadership of the government and the Riigikogu. The style is uncompromising, particularly in opposing ideological issues (the green transition, the car tax).
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
Cooperation is not directly mentioned, apart from polite addresses to colleagues ("Dear colleague Andres"). The speaker's position is largely critical and confrontational toward the government's policy, focusing on highlighting the mistakes in the government's actions.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Demonstrates a willingness to cooperate, referencing earlier discussions on energy matters with colleague Kadastik, which signals a readiness to engage in policy discussions. While appreciating Minister Michal's prior attentiveness, the individual/entity simultaneously insists firmly that the ministry provide the necessary materials, thereby applying procedural pressure.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
He briefly refers to the question raised by colleague Kovalenko-Kõlvart, demonstrating awareness of the issues championed by other opposition members and potential thematic overlap. There is no evidence of broader cross-party cooperation or a readiness to compromise with the government.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker is collaborating within the framework of the faction (EKRE), submitting a motion for rejection on their behalf. He addresses his colleagues (e.g., Kadastik, a member of the Economic Affairs Committee) and urges them to support his stance, particularly the members of the nuclear energy support group. This cooperation is directed toward achieving a shared opposition goal.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Regarding cooperation, reference is made to a past success where one former coalition party showed a positive attitude toward EKRE's bank tax proposal, though the idea ultimately failed to materialize. In the current context, however, there is no mention of active collaboration; the focus is solely on criticizing the government's decisions. Government representatives are specifically required to stick to the topic and maintain proper decorum.
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The speaker focuses on ideological confrontation and the criticism of opponents. There is no mention of cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-party activity.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker urges all members of parliament to support the draft legislation, highlighting its benefits for Estonia as a whole and striving to secure widespread backing. He actively questions committee members regarding the views and reasoning of their colleagues. There is no direct mention of cooperation with the coalition; rather, disappointment is voiced due to political opposition.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker is actively seeking constructive cooperation, asking the Minister to work with the members of their faction to ensure support for the opposition's sound legislative proposals. He appeals to the shared desire to maintain a positive and respectful culture when considering these bills.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Not enough data
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Cooperation is absent; the speaker's style is purely confrontational, demanding answers from the minister and the inclusion of economic analyses. There are no references to bilateral or cross-party cooperation.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker is cooperative in the legislative process, allowing the "initial draft" of the bill presented by the executive branch to be supplemented and improved. Reference is also made to the questions posed by other colleagues (Uibo, Seeme, Tiidus), showing a willingness to participate in the debate and take others' contributions into account.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Cooperation is demonstrated with colleagues when submitting interpellations ("with colleagues," "Tõnis and Jaak"), suggesting forms of collaboration within factions or the opposition. Communication with the government is characterized by a predominantly confrontational style, and no willingness to compromise is expressed.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker emphasizes the importance of inter-committee cooperation, proposing that seeking input from other committees (such as the Social Affairs Committee) be utilized as a solution. The speaker commends the rapporteurs for providing extensive background and supporting the substance of the draft legislation, thereby demonstrating openness to constructive discussion. The speaker is ready to resolve jurisdictional conflicts through collaboration.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker urges colleagues to back the VAT reduction proposals he has presented. He acknowledges that securing support from the ruling party will be difficult, but he will continue seeking backing through smaller, incremental steps. His cooperation style is direct and solicitous, focusing on pushing specific changes through.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Insufficient data.
2024-01-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is deficient; the speaker is rather on the defensive and criticizes the work of the Riigikogu department, referring to previous practices. There are no references to a willingness to compromise or cross-party cooperation.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker refers to cooperation with colleagues when submitting the inquiry ("We asked together with colleagues about the impact of the green transition"), which demonstrates the existence of intra-factional cooperation. There are no references to openness to compromise or cross-party cooperation.