By Months: Pipi-Liis Siemann

The political position is strongly procedural and value-based, centering on the work of the Constitutional Committee of the Riigikogu. He/She opposes draft legislation deemed immature or populist, such as the bill concerning the public disclosure of ministers' expenses. It is stressed that behavior in high office should be governed by ethics, morality, dignity, and honor, rather than strict legislation. The political framework is generally value-driven, presupposing an internal sense of responsibility from those holding power.

Political activity is centered on the legislative procedure, specifically the presentation of the work of the Constitutional Committee concerning the draft bill for establishing a special committee on the demographic crisis. The speaker emphasizes the necessity of tackling systemic issues, such as strengthening economic and overall security, deeming this more crucial than the formation of a new committee. Furthermore, attention is being paid to clarifying the implementation of legislative restrictions related to child protection.

The political position is primarily procedural and policy-based, focusing on communicating the work and decisions of the Constitutional Committee. The speaker conveyed the views of the government and the ministries (Justice, Education and Research), which were cautious or oppositional regarding both draft bills. The opposition to the new proposals (an additional public holiday, amendment to the election law) was moderate, emphasizing economic impacts and the functionality of the established system.

The political focus is centered on ensuring legal certainty and constitutionality, particularly concerning regulations governing legal aid and state fees. The speaker strongly supports the proposal to amend norms that could impede citizens' access to the courts due to the failure to account for essential living costs. This position is clearly policy-driven and concentrates on the functioning of the rule of law and the protection of citizens' rights.

The political position is focused on procedural correctness (the appointment of a Supreme Court member) and supporting practical changes in the social sphere (general care service). The stance is policy-based, emphasizing the need to improve the economic environment by reducing bureaucracy and increasing innovation. The speaker supports relevant changes that will make the lives of many people better.

The political position strongly emphasizes the priority of national security and the protection of state secrets, preferring a comprehensive and systemic review of legislation over narrow exceptions. Additionally, the speaker supports strategic public investments (e.g., optimizing the school network) that result in economic cost savings and are linked to climate goals. The speaker also believes that increasing security requires more than just "picking up small, isolated pieces"; instead, a comprehensive approach is necessary.

The political position is clearly in favor of rejecting the draft bill concerning the C1 level language requirement for members of local government councils, deeming it too restrictive. He/She supports the existing requirement for Estonian-language administration, stressing that the issue lies more in compliance with current laws and the improvement of political culture. The stance is moderately strong and focuses on the practical implementation of legislation.

The political position emphasizes the necessity of optimally restructuring the school network, prioritizing the quality of education over simply maintaining the current number of students in a school. The speaker criticizes deficiencies in regional policy, asserting that improving the living environment and employment opportunities should be the *reason* for school network reorganization, not the *result*. The overall stance is moderately firm and policy-driven, highlighting the importance of making intelligent decisions.