By Plenary Sessions: Pipi-Liis Siemann

The political emphasis is on ensuring national security and the protection of state secrets, particularly regarding the security vetting of individuals who hold post-of-duty access. The speaker supports the broader objective of the draft bill but opposes its narrow scope, stressing the need to address the issue comprehensively and by amending all related provisions. This stance is policy- and procedure-based, criticizing the creation of a single exception instead of implementing a systemic solution.

The political focus centers on the draft legislation regarding the compatibility of holding office as a member of the Riigikogu and a member of a local government council, an issue framed primarily as a legal and procedural matter. The speaker acknowledges a personal conflict of interest but neutrally conveys the committee's stance, which inclined toward rejecting the draft. This position is based more on policy and procedure, citing earlier practices and the Supreme Court's assessment.

The political position centers on supporting sweeping reforms, underscoring the necessity of strategic infrastructure investments. This stance is robustly policy- and results-driven, with the goal of realizing economic cost savings through the prevention of outdated infrastructure. There is a preference for linking investment subsidies to climate objectives, thereby achieving two goals concurrently.