By Plenary Sessions: Pipi-Liis Siemann

The style is formal, explanatory, and procedural, focusing on logical arguments and legal terminology. The speaker emphasizes responsibility and seriousness when addressing security issues and uses metaphors (e.g., the hammer and nail comparison) to criticize a narrow solution. He answers questions directly, but often refers to committee discussions or other institutions (Kapo, special committee) when he lacks personal information.

The style is highly formal, neutral, and descriptive, focusing on the precise reporting of the events, discussions, and voting results of the Constitutional Committee session. Logical appeals are employed, referencing specific dates, voting outcomes, and procedural decisions, entirely devoid of emotional or personal judgments.

The speaker's style is formal, polite, and constructive, beginning by thanking the minister and wishing him/her strength to carry out the extensive reforms. The emphasis is placed on logical argumentation and policy optimization, as the speaker poses a question aimed at achieving a twofold benefit from the investments.