By Months: Pipi-Liis Siemann

The speaker is knowledgeable about parliamentary procedure and the work of the Constitutional Committee, appearing as the representative of the lead committee for two draft bills. They are well-versed in the details of the legislation, distinguishing between the expense compensations for Riigikogu members and the representation expenses for government members. They also refer to the Ministry of Finance's arguments concerning the additional workload and financial cost associated with the submission of expense documents.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding demographic indicators (such as the Total Fertility Rate) and the absence of a systemic approach to the population crisis. They possess detailed knowledge of legislative procedures and the history of the committee's operations. Furthermore, they are familiar with the criteria for lifting restrictions on working with children (SKA restrictions) and are seeking specific examples concerning this matter.

The presenter demonstrates authority in legislative procedures and the analysis of electoral systems, utilizing technical terms (e.g., absolute figures, list voting, simple quota). The expertise relies on the positions of the heads of ministries (Ministry of Justice) and the State Electoral Service, as well as the assessment of economic (GDP, state budget expenditures) and social (student workload) impacts.

The speaker demonstrates a high level of expertise in the fields of constitutional and procedural law, addressing specific legal provisions and conflicts of law. He/She relies on the arguments put forth by the Chancellor of Justice and representatives of the Ministry of Justice, employing technical terminology (e.g., the principle of legal clarity, the procedural assistance application form, Section 182). This expertise is evident in the ability to analyze the interplay between legal norms and their practical consequences.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the work of the Constitutional Committee and the procedures for appointing judges, specifically highlighting the candidate’s (Oliver Kask) competencies in electoral law and his experience with the Venice Commission. He possesses profound knowledge concerning vocational education and workforce qualifications (specifically, the issue of overeducation). Furthermore, he maintains an interest in the administrative processes of social welfare, particularly concerning the transition of responsibilities among guardianship authorities.

The speaker demonstrates strong expertise regarding the work of the Constitutional Committee and procedural matters, detailing the procedure and terminology for accessing state secrets. They are competent in conveying complex legal nuances (e.g., ex officio right versus certificate-based access) and referencing previous institutional practices, including Supreme Court assessments. Furthermore, they possess knowledge regarding the alignment of investments with climate goals and the achievement of economic cost savings.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the work of the Constitutional Committee and the field of local government legislation, particularly concerning language requirements and administrative procedures. He/She refers to specific language proficiency levels (C1, B1), as well as supervisory bodies (the Language Inspectorate, the Language Board), and the positions held by the Ministry of Justice.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in educational governance and regional policy, employing terms like "optimal reorganization of the school network" and "teacher shortage." They are well-versed in the problems of small rural schools (e.g., local 6-grade schools) and can analyze the relationship between population decline and institutional viability.