By Months: Marek Reinaas

Insufficient data.

Direct political opponents are not criticized; instead, the criticism is aimed at structural problems within the economy. Specifically, they criticize the excessive reliance on activities geared toward the local market, such as real estate development and banking, which account for a disproportionately large share of the total profit.

There is no direct opposition or criticism aimed at other politicians or groups; the speaker focuses on conveying the consensus decisions and the procedural steps taken. Instead of criticism, it is emphasized that cases related to foreign subsidies are extremely rare, or non-existent, in Estonia.

The criticism is aimed at both the previous government (a six-year delay in the Competition Directive) and the current opposition. He/She criticizes the Social Democratic Party faction's proposed amendment to the Competition Act and calls Lauri Läänemets' behavior during the session "parliamentary bullying." The speaker categorically rejects accusations that the new law would weaken the Competition Authority, calling them "ludicrous."

The main opponent is Urmas Reinsalu, whose economic and mathematical claims regarding the price of electricity are being sharply refuted, emphasizing numerical inaccuracy (e.g., the calculation involving 76 billion versus tens of millions). Varro Vooglaid’s facts concerning the gender composition of party boards are also being corrected. The criticism is primarily fact-based and focuses on the opponents’ inaccuracies.

The primary objection is directed at the draft taxi regulation presented by Mr. Grünthal, which is considered unnecessary and ineffective. The criticism is rooted in policy and procedure, emphasizing that the bill either attempts to solve existing oversight problems or duplicates laws already in force. The Economic Committee proposed rejecting the bill, a motion that passed by a vote of 5 in favor and 3 against.

The criticism is aimed more at vague or insufficient actions, demanding concrete proposals for increasing children's participation in sports. General passivity and complaining against the backdrop of the economic situation are also indirectly criticized. The criticism is policy- and results-based, not personal.