By Plenary Sessions: Marek Reinaas

The primary objection is directed at Varro Vooglaid's statement concerning the representation of women on political party boards. The criticism is intense and purely fact-based, specifically refuting a particular claim made about Eesti 200.

Insufficient data.

The main criticism is directed at Urmas Reinsalu and the Isamaa party, accusing them of emphasizing irrelevant topics (VAT) and making mathematical errors. The attacks are intense and focus on the opponent's lack of logic and numerical competence, often contrasting their current stance with historically high electricity prices that occurred while Isamaa was in government. The speed and quality of the ministry's bill processing are also being criticized.

No direct confrontation is articulated, but the speaker neutrally references the questions posed by other members of parliament (e.g., Mölder, Kokk, Aab). The criticism and doubts primarily concerned the growth of the administrative burden on the courts, the resource requirements of the Competition Authority, and the scope of the privilege against self-incrimination.