By Plenary Sessions: Marek Reinaas
Total Sessions: 26
Fully Profiled: 26
2025-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
There is no expression of direct political confrontation, nor are specific political opponents criticized. The criticism is instead directed against the structural problems of the Estonian economy and a passive competitive mindset, which hinders the growth of prosperity.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The criticism is aimed at the actions of Lauri Läänemets and the presiding officer of the session, focusing on procedural irregularity and unethical conduct. In Läänemets's case, there is a strong suggestion of personal or political harassment, rather than substantive opposition. The intensity of the criticism is moderate but direct, demanding an explanation regarding the propriety of the behavior.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at those who accused Minister Liisa Pakosta of long delays in transposing the directive, and those who claimed the draft bill would weaken the Competition Authority. The criticism targets procedural and political attacks, labeling them "absurd" and "rubbish." They also criticize the mindset where punishment, rather than market restoration, is considered the most important priority.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main confrontation was with the faction of the Social Democratic Party, whose proposal for the complete replacement of the draft bill was clearly rejected by the leading committee (2 in favor, 6 against). The amendment proposed by the Legal Affairs Committee was also rejected, in preference to the more precise version submitted by the initiator. The criticism is directed at specific amendments and the procedural substance.
2025-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
Criticizes the widely circulated media narrative regarding Lithuania's economic success, pointing out Estonia's advantages in knowledge intensity and R&D spending. Expresses clear opposition to the previous decision to make the second pension pillar voluntary, arguing that it damaged equity investments. Deems the justification that a drop in productivity is positive because it kept employees working to be unreasonable.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The primary objection is directed at Varro Vooglaid's statement concerning the representation of women on political party boards. The criticism is intense and purely fact-based, specifically refuting a particular claim made about Eesti 200.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Insufficient data.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is directed at Urmas Reinsalu and the Isamaa party, accusing them of emphasizing irrelevant topics (VAT) and making mathematical errors. The attacks are intense and focus on the opponent's lack of logic and numerical competence, often contrasting their current stance with historically high electricity prices that occurred while Isamaa was in government. The speed and quality of the ministry's bill processing are also being criticized.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
No direct confrontation is articulated, but the speaker neutrally references the questions posed by other members of parliament (e.g., Mölder, Kokk, Aab). The criticism and doubts primarily concerned the growth of the administrative burden on the courts, the resource requirements of the Competition Authority, and the scope of the privilege against self-incrimination.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The main opposition is directed at the draft regulation concerning taxi services, which was presented by Mr. Grünthal and which the commission recommended rejecting. The criticism is both substantive and procedural, as the draft fails to resolve oversight issues and merely duplicates existing language requirements. The opposition is clear, relying on the positions held by the ministries and the majority of the commission.
2025-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.
The criticism targets the lack of solutions and the excessive complaining ("whining") in the political debate. Opponents are being asked for policy-based and clear proposals, not vague descriptions of the problems. The intensity of the criticism is moderate, yet sharp.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Insufficient data.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the Isamaa party and Mr. Reinsalu, who are accused of underestimating the earlier "zero budget" idea and lacking mathematical competence. The criticism is rooted in politics and rhetoric, highlighting Isamaa's assertion that a zero budget has zero impact. Reinsalu is also being accused of potential hypocrisy, given that he proudly lauded the 100 million euro support for Ukraine included in the budget.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The backlash is aimed at the members of parliament who labeled the idea of cutting expense reimbursements as populism and simple-minded, while also criticizing their lack of solidarity with the public. The criticism focuses more on their attitudes and skepticism, rather than on any specific counter-policy. Lauri Laats' question regarding whether the measure goes far enough is also mentioned.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
He opposed Aivar Koka, indirectly criticizing his numerical juggling, while still acknowledging its virtuosity and effectiveness. The confrontation is rooted in the conflict between politics and mathematical interpretation, emphasizing that he himself always casts the correct vote, regardless of his mood.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
There is no oppositional viewpoint, as the speaker is fulfilling the role of a rapporteur, merely referencing the committee's work. The criticism is aimed more at the shortcomings of the draft legislation (the absence of coverage/funding sources) than at specific adversaries.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is primarily directed against the "fans of orthodox expenditure-based budgeting" who oppose the activity-based approach. Also criticized is the procedural quality of the goals and metrics compiled by the ministries, which leaves a ridiculous impression.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
There is no direct criticism of opponents, but there is indirect criticism aimed at previous habitual state governance and bureaucracy, which has prevented the country's finances from being put in order. The criticism targets actions that are carried out "simply out of habit" and whose necessity is never questioned.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
There is insufficient data. The speaker notes that no amendments were submitted by the deadline for submitting proposals, which indicates a lack of active opposition to the draft bill under consideration.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Insufficient information
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker impartially relays Jürgen Ligi's criticism regarding the VAT reduction bill. His criticism centered on the lack of analyses concerning its budgetary and socio-economic impact. Ligi opposed the draft law strictly on economic grounds, asserting that in a capitalist market economy, prices are set by the relationship between supply and demand, not by the tax.
2024-05-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
Insufficient data set
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is no stance of opposition; instead, it is highlighted that not a single amendment proposal was submitted concerning the draft legislation, indicating the absence of opposition during this phase of the procedure.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
There is no direct opposition or criticism, but the speaker reports on critical or clarification-seeking questions raised by other Riigikogu members (Aivar Sõerd, Rain Epler). These questions concerned the size of the percentages related to the agreement and the significance of the agreement.