By Plenary Sessions: Marek Reinaas

The rhetorical style is direct, explanatory, and fact-focused, with the goal of clarifying and correcting a previously presented inaccuracy. The tone is neutral and logical, stressing the necessity of knowing the correct fact ("Just so the fact is known").

The style is strictly formal, neutral, and procedural, with the aim of providing the Plenary Session with an objective overview of the commission's deliberation. A logical appeal is utilized, concentrating on facts, specific issues, and decisions reached by consensus, thereby avoiding emotional judgments.

The rhetorical style is dual: analytical and procedural on the topic of legislation, acknowledging procedural errors. However, when engaging with opponents, the style is sharp and confrontational, repeatedly emphasizing the opponent’s mathematical incompetence and numerical errors. Appeals are primarily logical and data-driven, stressing that "mathematics is not bad" and "numbers generally do not lie."

The speaker’s rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and objective, which is typical for a committee rapporteur. They focus on the detailed description of facts and the progression of the discussion, accurately quoting the responses of the minister and officials, as well as the questions posed by other deputies. The style is logical and evidence-based, avoiding emotional or personal appeals.