By Months: Marek Reinaas

The style of cooperation is consensual and supportive, as the speaker emphasizes that the amendments received consensual support both from the lead committee and the representative of the initiator. This cooperation primarily takes place between the committees and the initiators of the draft legislation, focusing on the adoption of technical corrections.

The speaker supportively references the innovative solutions outlined by the Minister of Economic Affairs, demonstrating cooperation within the ruling coalition. There is no indication of openness to compromise or cross-party cooperation.

The style of cooperation is consensual and respectful; it is repeatedly emphasized that procedural decisions were made by consensus. The contribution and attendance of colleagues (Urve Tiidus) and ministers (Liisa-Ly Pakosta) at the committee meeting are acknowledged. The speaker acts more as a mediator and rapporteur, supporting the bill initiated by the government.

The speaker highlights the extensive and democratic engagement process in the drafting of legislation, involving dozens of stakeholders, including the Competition Authority, the Bar Association, and various business organizations. They note that most of the Competition Authority's proposals were incorporated into the law, and a compromise was reached with the Bar Association. Regarding economic diplomacy, they support the Team Estonia platform.

The style of cooperation is pragmatic and procedure-focused, involving close collaboration with ministers and ministry officials. It acknowledges flaws in the legislative process and supports the "Solomonic decision" to halt the reading, allowing time for parliamentarians and market participants to submit proposals. This demonstrates a willingness to compromise for the sake of improving the quality of legislation.

Cooperation is carried out within formal legislative structures, involving ministry officials (representatives of the Ministry of Regional Affairs and Agriculture and the Ministry of Climate) and commission members. The speaker emphasizes the progress of the committee's discussion and notes both consensus decisions (e.g., placing the draft bill on the agenda) and the voting results.

The style of collaboration is formal and institutional, involving the posing of questions to ministers and colleagues in the Riigikogu chamber, while simultaneously recognizing the thoroughness of the report. There are no indications of cross-party cooperation or the pursuit of compromises, but the interaction remains courteous and pertinent.