By Agendas: Marek Reinaas

Total Agendas: 28

Fully Profiled: 28

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
2025-10-09
Discussion of the Crucial National Issue 'The Future of the Estonian Economy'

15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

No direct political opponent is named, but criticism is leveled at the previous economic structure and mindset that have led to low productivity. The critique focuses on structural issues, such as excessive dependence on the local real estate and banking sectors, and a deficient export-oriented "posture."
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-10
Draft law amending the Competition Act (654 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-09-04
Chair implementation

15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu

The primary criticism is aimed at Lauri Läänemets’s conduct, as he is accused of potentially improper and deliberate obstruction of parliamentary proceedings. The criticism addresses both his personal motivation and the procedural justification, casting doubt on his claim of urgency. Furthermore, the propriety of the presiding officer’s decision is also being questioned.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-17
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (609 SE) – third reading

15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session

Opposition is being mounted against those who filed a motion of no confidence against Minister Liisa Pakosta, categorically refuting the accusations of delaying the adoption of the law and weakening the Competition Authority. Criticism is also aimed at those who prioritize punishment determined by officials over the rapid restoration of the market situation, thereby calling into question their ideological priority.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-16
Draft law amending the Consumer Protection Act (624 SE) - Second Reading

XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting

Insufficient data.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-11
Continuation of the second reading of the draft law amending the Competition Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (609 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition focused on Amendment Proposal No. 1 submitted by the Social Democratic Party faction, which was clearly rejected by the leading committee (2 votes in favor, 6 against). Furthermore, the Legal Committee’s original Amendment Proposal No. 35 was also rejected, as the bill’s initiator presented an alternative that was substantively identical but formally superior.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-06-05
Discussion of the significant national issue initiated by the Economics Committee: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy?"

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.

The criticism is primarily aimed at earlier political decisions that hampered long-term economic development, such as making the pension pillar voluntary, which forced pension funds to pull back from equity investments. He/She also criticizes the unreasonable narrative used to justify the drop in productivity. Regarding foreign policy, a threat is perceived in President Trump's tariff policy.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-21
Draft law amending the Securities Market Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (588 SE) – third reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The main opponent is Mr. Varro Vooglaid, whose claim regarding the significant minority of women on party boards is being refuted. The criticism is intense and strictly fact-based, focusing on the inaccuracy of that specific assertion.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-19
Draft law amending the Consumer Protection Act § 4 (624 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

Direct opposition to the bill was not expressed; instead, constructive questions and concerns were raised. Urve Tiidus inquired about the potential increase in digital waste and the high cost of software development, which was more an expression of caution. The criticism was policy-based and focused on the deficiencies in the draft’s implementation provisions (Piia Schults).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Second reading of the draft law amending the Electricity Market Act (556 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is Urmas Reinsalu, whose criticism focuses on the inaccuracy and mathematical errors in the numerical claims he presented. The dispute is intense, as specific calculations are being corrected to demonstrate the opponent's error regarding the order of magnitude of the costs (76 billion, not tens of millions).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-07
Draft law amending the Planning Act and other laws (accelerating the adoption of renewable energy) (541 SE) - second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The main criticism is directed at Urmas Reinsalu and the Isamaa party, who are accused of disregarding the numbers and focusing too heavily on VAT. The opponents' positions are deemed inadequate, with critics highlighting historical electricity price peaks (€4,000) that occurred while they were in government—a powerful political attack.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-05-05
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (609 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The opposition is evident in the committee's voting results (4 dissenting votes) and in the critical questions posed by Tõnis Mölder and Jaak Aab. The criticism focused on the procedural consequences of the draft bill, such as the growing administrative burden on courts and the obligation for businesses to present factual evidence. The speaker does not criticize the opponents but presents their questions and the minister's answers neutrally.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-15
Draft law amending the Public Transport Act (578 SE) - First Reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

The primary opposition is directed at the bill introduced by Mr. Grünthal, criticizing its substance as unnecessary and failing to resolve existing oversight issues. The criticism is policy- and procedure-centric, highlighting that the bill duplicates already existing legislation (such as the Language Act).
View Profile View Agenda
2025-04-15
The Ministry of Justice and Digital Transformation's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035."

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.

There is no outright conflict; rather, the criticism focuses on the lack of clarity in the government's communication regarding the concept of the "personal state." The critique is aimed at improving comprehension, not opposing the substance of the policy itself.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-20
Discussion of the nationally important issue "Plan for the Future of Sport: How to Bring Medals and Get Children Moving"

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.

The criticism is aimed at the general "moaning and groaning" regarding sports results, demanding concrete and actionable solutions instead. Direct political opponents are not criticized by name; rather, the necessity of avoiding vague rhetoric is emphasized.
View Profile View Agenda
2025-02-11
A debate on foreign policy initiated as a matter of significant national importance by the Foreign Affairs Committee.

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Direct opposition is not expressed, nor is the minister personally criticized; instead, an action-oriented question is raised concerning the role of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The criticism is aimed more at the scope and effectiveness of the activities, rather than the fundamental principles of the policy itself.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-11
Third reading of the draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The main criticism is aimed at the Isamaa party and Mr. Reinsalu. The criticism focuses on their claims regarding the zero budget having zero impact, which is considered mathematically incorrect. Furthermore, a contradiction has been highlighted: Reinsalu boasted about the budget's support for Ukraine, yet Isamaa might vote against the budget.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-09
Draft law amending the Act on the Status of a Member of the Riigikogu (545 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

The standoff targets the members of parliament who considered Lauri Hussar's initial proposal populist or simplistic, pointing to their skepticism and lack of solidarity. Specific political parties are not directly criticized, but it is stressed that the agreement was achieved despite the initial resistance.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-12-04
Second reading of the draft law on the security tax (512 SE)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponent is Aivar Kokk, whose juggling of numbers is recognized as virtuosic and impressive. Although the opponent's skill is praised, his arguments are essentially rejected due to the inevitability of the security tax. The criticism is policy-based, but presented politely.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-07
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu, "Submitting a proposal to the Republic's Government to lower the value-added tax on foodstuffs to 5 percent" (492 OE)

15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The presenter avoids expressing direct opposition to the draft legislation or criticizing other politicians, strictly maintaining the role of a rapporteur. They deflect political or party-specific questions (such as those concerning the rating of Eesti 200), noting that these topics were not included in the committee's discussion.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-11-06
Overview of the Use and Preservation of State Property in 2023–2024. Five Years of Activity-Based State Budget: Results of the Reform and Necessary Further Decisions

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The main opponents are the "orthodox fans of cost-based budgeting," whose views are considered insufficient for evaluating state activities and identifying areas for savings. The criticism is directed at the procedural opposition to activity-based budgeting. Ministries are also indirectly criticized for creating "absurd" and "pointless" goals and metrics.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-10-16
Draft law on the 2025 state budget (513 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Specific opponents or opposition groups are not being criticized, but the criticism is aimed at previous customary state activities and bureaucracy, which must be reduced using zero-based budgeting. It is stressed that many things are done purely out of habit, without questioning their actual necessity.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-09-11
Second Reading of the Bill (450 SE) on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Estonia and the Government of the State of Qatar for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income and the Prevention of Tax Evasion and Tax Fraud, and the Protocol thereto

Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session

No opposition: The speaker emphasized that no amendments were submitted, and no questions or comments were raised during the committee session. This suggests widespread approval of the draft bill at this stage of the proceedings.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-06-11
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Estonia and the Government of the State of Qatar for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income and the Prevention of Tax Evasion and Tax Fraud, and its accompanying Protocol (450 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

No opposition is expressed or even mentioned; instead, the emphasis is placed on consensus and the fact that the Finance Minister’s presentation was so comprehensive that the committee had neither questions nor comments.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-29
First reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Lowering the Value-Added Tax on Domestic Fruits and Vegetables to 5 Percent" (406 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

While not expressing personal opposition, he accurately relays criticism concerning the draft bill, specifically focusing on the absence of impact assessments and budgetary concerns. He highlights Jürgen Ligi's critique that any reduction in VAT must take into account the budget and the socio-economic effects. He also conveys the criticism that in a capitalist market economy, the price is determined by the balance between supply and demand, not by the tax itself.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-05-16
Debate on the matter of national importance initiated by the Economic Affairs Committee: "How to increase productivity in the Estonian economy?"

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session

Not enough data
View Profile View Agenda
2024-04-03
Second reading of the Draft Act (368 SE) on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Estonia and the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income and the Prevention of Tax Evasion and Fiscal Fraud, and the Protocol thereto

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The attitude of opposition is entirely absent; instead, it is stressed that no proposals for amendment concerning the draft bill were received by the submission deadline. Criticism is not directed towards any group or political opponent.
View Profile View Agenda
2024-03-06
First reading of the Draft Act on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Estonia and the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with respect to Taxes on Income and the Prevention of Tax Evasion and Fiscal Fraud, and the Protocol thereto (368 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

No direct confrontation is expressed, but critical questions raised in the committee by other deputies (Aivar Sõerd, Rain Epler) regarding the content and significance of the agreement are referenced. The criticism was policy-based (the tax percentage, the importance of the trade partner), and factual answers were provided in response.
View Profile View Agenda
Back to Profiling