By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

The primary opponents are the Reform Party and the prime minister, who stands accused of driving the constitutional amendment forward. The criticism is intense, focusing both on the initiators' motives (political self-gain) and the government's irresponsibility in ignoring the stability and economy of the state. A compromise is out of the question, as the Centre Party opposes the initiative on principle.

The criticism is directed straight at the ruling government coalition, which is made up of the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Eesti 200. The critique is based on both policy and procedure, specifically accusing the coalition of stripping large families of benefits and health insurance, as well as implementing a new car tax. It also criticizes the government's failure to transpose a directive on time, which resulted in a substantial fine.

Strong opposition to the coalition majority, criticizing the methods and quality used to draft their political statements, and referring to the draft bill as "shoddy work" (or "defective"). The opposition targets both procedural and substantive shortcomings, particularly regarding the timing and legitimacy of the statement of support for Georgia.

The main targets of criticism are the Prime Minister and the Reform Party, who are accused of violating political culture and using political technology tactics to suppress scandals. Criticism is also aimed at Kaja Kallas’s previous government for its passivity regarding demographic issues. The attacks are intense and target both procedure (failure to consult) and policy (tax hikes, benefit cuts).

Strong opposition is aimed at both the previous and the current government, who are accused of damaging family policy and denying the crisis. The previous prime minister's stance that low birth rates are normal was deemed irresponsible. The current coalition is criticized for cutting support for large families and introducing new taxes.

The criticism is directed at the previous government’s financial management, which resulted in situations where massive sums (100 million, 900 million) went unspent, even as efforts are underway to cut much smaller amounts. The criticism specifically targets shortcomings in policy and performance.

The primary criticism is aimed at the governing coalition, accusing them of fostering a poor parliamentary culture where opposition initiatives are automatically voted down, regardless of their merit. The Ministry of Education is sharply criticized for ignoring the teacher succession crisis and engaging in displacement activities. The criticism is procedural and policy-based, not personal.

Criticism is leveled against the government’s budget management (the Prime Minister, Kallas, Võrklaev), accusing them of engaging in abnormal practices and the misuse of funds. Furthermore, Urmas Reinsalu’s political claim regarding parliamentary support is criticized, and the characterization of the parliamentary situation as a "hostage crisis" is rejected, defending the right of the factions to act according to their convictions.

The primary opposition is aimed at the government's policies, particularly regarding the steep increase in state fees, which is widely regarded as disproportionate and financially painful for the public. The criticism is strictly policy- and performance-based, calling into question the proportionality of the government's decisions.