By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

The economic outlook is pessimistic, stressing the economic downturn, falling productivity, and ten consecutive quarters of contraction. The analysis sharply criticizes the tax hikes, especially the rapid increase in consumption taxes, which, in its estimation, deepen the crisis and impede investment. It also highlights rising unemployment and people's fear of losing their jobs.

The speaker strongly opposes the proposed car tax, arguing that it disproportionately affects large families who require bigger vehicles. He criticizes the government's austerity measures and demands clarification on the source of funding for the European Union fine, given that the budget has already been slashed across the board. Furthermore, he objects to the withdrawal of benefits (200 euros per month) from families with many children.

Not enough data.

The economic views expressed are strongly critical of current fiscal policy, opposing the multiple tax hikes and the introduction of new taxes (including the car tax). Emphasis is placed on the difficult economic situation faced by the people of Estonia. Skepticism is expressed regarding the increase of defense spending to 5 percent, questioning where such funds will be sourced given the current difficult circumstances.

Economic perspectives emphasize securing families' financial stability through government support, so that people do not have to worry about affording food and clothing. The speaker opposes raising taxes and implementing new types of taxes (such as a car tax), which would worsen the situation for families.

Economic perspectives stress fiscal transparency and accountability, favoring a cost-based budget as a superior mechanism for monitoring the actual flow of funds. Concerns are raised regarding inefficient public expenditure, particularly where substantial amounts of money remain unspent.

Economic views center on aspects of the workforce and social security. There is criticism regarding the inadequacy of the teachers' salary increase, and concern that the current sick pay system causes financial loss for employees, forcing them to go to work while sick, which is a negative consequence.

The speaker advocates for strict budgetary discipline and transparency, demanding a cost-based budget. Strong criticism is leveled against the government's fiscal incompetence, which has resulted in the discovery of large amounts of unspent funds, indicating a failure in planning.

Economic perspectives emphasize concern regarding the financial burden placed on citizens resulting from the simultaneous increase in fees and taxes (including the car tax). Stability or a gradual price adjustment is preferred over a sharp 32.4% increase, the latter being considered disproportionate.