By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

It emphasizes the Centre Party's principled and unified opposition to amending the constitution. It refers to support for the views of Constitutional Assembly member Liia Hänni regarding the value of the constitution's permanence. Direct cooperation with other parties in opposing the bill is not described.

The speaker emphasizes that their faction (the Center Party) did not vote for the car tax, thereby distancing themselves from the coalition's decisions. They refer to a support group operating within the Riigikogu that prepared a draft concerning tax exemptions, which demonstrated a willingness to cooperate. However, they stress that the coalition disregarded the fruits of this cooperation.

Not enough data.

The speaker sharply criticizes the Prime Minister for failing to cooperate with coalition partners over the sudden raising of the defense spending issue. Simultaneously, he/she points to cross-parliamentary cooperation on demography, noting that all six factions agree on the complexity of the situation, even if they do not agree on the solutions.

Cooperation is taking place among the opposition parties and within the support group for large families, where topics like car tax exemptions were discussed. A lack of cooperation is evident on the coalition's side, as their ideas and proposals were not even brought up for discussion.

The speaker demonstrates openness to cooperation, noting as a positive sign the Prime Minister's potential agreement to prioritize a cost-based budget. This gives hope that things are starting to move in the right direction, indicating a readiness to support positive changes regardless of political affiliation.

The speaker stresses the opposition's readiness to support the coalition's initiatives (such as micro-qualifications), provided they are sound, and anticipates cooperation among the other opposition parties. At the same time, he criticizes the coalition for its inability to cooperate and its lack of willingness to back the opposition's reasonable proposals. He points to the good personal relationships he maintains with colleagues (for instance, in the basketball support group), even when their political views diverge.

The speaker primarily operates as a critic but demonstrates a willingness to defend the procedural conduct of other factions (the Social Democrats). Arguments are heavily supported by external legal experts and institutions (the Chancellor of Justice, the Union of Jurists), indicating collaboration with the legal community.

There is not enough data.