By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev
Total Sessions: 168
Fully Profiled: 168
2025-11-06
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
Strong criticism has been leveled against the government and the coalition for defending the e-voting system and for the unjustified rejection of opposition bills. The speaker criticizes the parliamentary culture where opposition initiatives are rejected (in 99.9% of cases) not based on their substance, but because of the initiator. Opponents are accused of avoiding answers and "playing dumb" regarding e-voting security issues.
2025-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The criticism is aimed more at the procedure for preparing and presenting the draft legislation (for example, the requirement to clarify a complex explanatory memorandum) than at specific political opponents. There is no direct opposition or personal attack; the emphasis is placed on procedural oversight.
2025-10-22
XV Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
He/She sharply criticizes the government and the ministry (Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs) for procedural obstacles, such as the pretext of lacking an impact assessment. The coalition is accused of "bluntly" voting down the opposition's reasonable proposals without consideration. Attention is also drawn to the government's poor practice of sending representatives to committee meetings who are unable to explain the decisions.
2025-10-22
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The criticism is aimed at the government and the minister for their inaction, given that the situation concerning the speed and price of fixed broadband has not improved in the past year. The critique is rooted in policy and performance metrics, demanding clear steps to improve the situation.
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker is directly criticizing the Reform Party-led government for raising the VAT, which has driven up the cost of food. They also challenge the stance of the Minister of Finance, who supposedly viewed other European countries as foolish for implementing tax cuts. The criticism targets a specific political decision (the tax hike) and its resulting consequences.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the Reform Party and the government, accusing them of breaking pre-election promises and pursuing an unfair tax policy. The criticism is both policy-driven (concerning the impact of abolishing the 'tax hump') and procedural (regarding the inconsistencies and delays in establishing car tax exemptions). The intensity of the attacks is high, with the government's behavior being referred to as "cynical" and "incomprehensible."
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the minister, who stand accused of shortsightedness and a lack of strategy concerning public sector wages. The government's actions are viewed as unstable and potentially a pre-election maneuver that fails to address the actual needs of the employees. The speaker asks directly whether the government considers the protest "pointless," or if there is, in fact, "some substance to the people's grievances."
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The opposition is directed at the government's fiscal policy, criticizing the rapid growth of state debt and the use of borrowed funds for non-operational expenses. Social policy is also being criticized for failing to provide adequate support to less-affluent groups. The criticism is policy-based, calling into question the government's overall vision and strategy.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The standoff is aimed at the government and the minister, whose political proposal is deemed insufficient and unambitious. The criticism is rooted in policy and budgetary concerns, questioning the substance of the negotiations and the budget priorities, especially in light of the alleged lack of funding. The speaker questions the government's capacity to provide maximum support to families with children.
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
The confrontation is aimed at both the current and previous governments, who are accused of undermining families' sense of security through unstable support policies. The criticism is based on policy and procedure, citing the subsequent revocation of benefits for large families after they had initially been increased as a prime example. The government's attempt to present the reduction of the car tax as genuine assistance is also under fire.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The primary targets of criticism are former Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets (for the decision to close the Kopli station) and former Prime Minister Kaja Kallas (for delegating responsibility and setting priorities). The criticism focuses on political choices (pitting officials' salaries against the station) and incompetence (closing the station despite having the necessary funds). Furthermore, the government is criticized for its failure to guarantee police officers and rescuers a decent wage during a period of high inflation.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The main opponents are the coalition parties and the Social Democrats, who are accused of voting down the Centre Party's substantive proposals and using a "steamroller" to crush dissent. Criticism is intense, focusing on political malpractice, hypocrisy, and a government hostile to families. Separately, representatives of the Reform Party are criticized, with specific reference to donations made by the founders of Bolt, which may have influenced legislative decisions.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
The primary criticism targets the Reform Party-led governments and their fiscal policies, which are often characterized as hostile toward public sector employees. Critics point to the failure to deliver on political promises (such as the goal of raising teachers' salaries to 120% of the national average) and the government's alleged financial mismanagement ("money is/is not available"). There is also criticism regarding the shifting of responsibilities from the central state to local municipalities.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
The main opponents are the "coalition MPs," who are criticized on political grounds because they did not support the bill initiated by the Centre Party. The criticism is directed at a political decision that prevents the lives of ordinary people from becoming easier and cheaper.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The primary adversaries are the coalition (specifically the Reform Party) and the various ministries. The speaker criticizes the coalition's political culture, noting that opposition bills are rejected "simply as a matter of principle." Furthermore, the ministries are attacked for using procedural pretexts (such as the absence of an impact analysis), which the speaker labels as hypocritical and a convenient tactic. Bewilderment is expressed regarding Reform Party members "leaping to the defense of large banks."
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, press briefing
The primary target of criticism is the government coalition, which is being slammed for the confusion surrounding the car tax, its indecisiveness, and for implementing only cosmetic changes. Historical responsibility for establishing the tax is placed squarely on the Social Democrats, who are cited as the original authors of the idea and who do not appear to support abolishing the tax. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the Government of the Republic and the management of the state-owned enterprise Elering, accusing them of disregarding Estonia's socio-economic consequences when establishing external interconnections. The criticism is based on policy and procedural grounds, demanding clarification on who authorized Elering to disregard national interests. The necessity of redirecting investments into domestic networks is being considered, contrasting with the current focus.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The opposition's stance is primarily directed at the Government of the Republic as a whole and specific ministers (Kaja Kallas, Kristina Kallas, Igor Taro, Liisa-Ly Pakosta). Criticism focuses on political incompetence (the failure of the education agreement), unfair cuts (the Kopli fire station), and broken promises (teachers' salaries). The opposition culminated in the submission of a motion of no confidence against Minister of Justice and Digital Affairs Liisa-Ly Pakosta.
2025-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the committee or the majority responsible for the bill's expedited procedure, criticizing their justifications and the precedent they have set. The criticism is intense, focusing on procedural violations and constitutional doubts, and also citing the opposition of the President and the Chancellor of Justice.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker sharply criticizes the government majority, accusing them of violating the constitution and deliberately pushing through unconstitutional bills. The opposition is especially strong regarding the pressuring of a specific church (the Estonian Orthodox Church) through legislation, which is deemed unconstitutional. Furthermore, colleagues (Jaanus Karilaid) are also criticized for demagoguery and polarizing society.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the bill’s initiators and supporters, who face criticism for procedural shortcomings and a failure to address risks. The criticism is intense and politically charged, stressing that crucial questions (regarding audits and consequences) remain unanswered. The speaker urges other members of the Riigikogu not to support the bill.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main confrontation is between the Ministry of Justice and the minister, who is being criticized for the decision to stop translating legislation into Russian. The criticism is intense and targets the minister's credibility, as it is alleged that the full truth regarding the financial reasons was not disclosed at the time. The possibility of a compromise has not been raised; instead, justification for the decision is being demanded.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the ruling government coalition (Reform Party, Estonia 200) and the parties currently in power in Tallinn. Criticism is directed at political opportunism (pre-election campaigns) and procedural irregularities, especially the deliberate advancement of a bill that conflicts with the constitution. The government is heavily criticized for causing a crisis of confidence with the trade unions due to the unilateral amendment of labor legislation.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
The main opponent is the ruling coalition (Reform Party, Estonia 200, Social Democratic Party), which is being sharply criticized for its political decisions. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of making decisions that are detrimental to pensioners and are considered "shameful." The criticism is policy-based, focusing specifically on tax increases and the breaking of promises.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The primary opponent is "the state, represented by the government," which is being criticized for failing to resolve a specific bottleneck (the funding of school meals). The criticism is intense and focuses on the government's inability to address the issue during budget negotiations and support previous legislative drafts. The opposition is policy- and performance-based.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Strong opposition is directed towards the Government of the Republic and coalition members, who are criticized for political decisions (taxes and cuts) and procedural errors (the mechanical voting down of proposals). Separately, Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna is criticized for statements that increase public uncertainty and fear of war. The criticism is primarily policy- and performance-based.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary conflict is with the coalition, which is accused of automatically rejecting opposition initiatives, even those that might solve a significant problem. Criticism is also aimed at the former Tallinn authorities (deputy mayors from Isamaa and SDE), who initially supported the introduction of new light mobility devices onto the streets but later acknowledged the issue. The speaker views the coalition's conduct as uncivilized for parliamentary political culture.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The primary opposition is aimed at the ruling coalition and the Minister of Education, who are criticized for failing to deliver on political promises and for presenting unrealistic budget plans. The criticism is intense, centering on both political and procedural failures, and specifically highlights the coalition's repeated rejection of legislative bills.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the Prime Minister, whose statements regarding aid to Latvia are considered irresponsible and illogical, given Estonia's own financial deficit. The criticism is intense and focuses on the head of government's priorities and capacity to manage the project.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
Criticism is aimed at the activities of the government (the coalition), particularly concerning the lack of transparency in the budget and the implementation of qualification requirements for youth work. The intensity of the opposition is moderate, focusing on the quality and procedures of political decisions. The coalition agreement (between the Reform Party and Eesti 200) serves as the foundational policy document, the implementation of which is being called into question.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
There is no criticism, but the speaker notes the presence of individuals in society who are categorically opposed to nuclear energy. The confrontation is primarily issue-based and societal, rather than being aimed at a specific political opponent.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary conflict is directed at the government and the Reform Party, whose tax policy is being sharply criticized. The criticism focuses on both policy choices and competence levels, raising the question of whether the Estonian government truly knows how to manage financial affairs better than all other EU countries.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The main confrontation is directed at the government and its ministers, who are criticized for their lack of specificity, strategic despair, and procedural sluggishness. The criticism is policy-based, particularly regarding the protracted delays in resolving issues related to infrastructure development, ensuring food security, and aid to Ukraine. The intensity of the attacks is moderate but demanding, emphasizing the government's inability to act swiftly.
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the Minister of Education and Research and the government's actions, accusing them of poor political culture (specifically, the delay of materials) and failed reforms. The criticism is intense, particularly concerning the transition to Estonian-language education and the teachers' salary increase, which is widely viewed as a mockery of teachers. The criticism is primarily policy- and procedure-based.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The main opposition is directed against Lauri Läänemets, the chairman of the Social Democratic Party, and the initiators of the bill, who are being criticized for constitutional violations and the bill's redundancy. The criticism is intense and focuses on political and legal incompetence, as well as the opponents' attempt to use geopolitical rhetoric (Putin, the Kremlin) instead of legal arguments.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The primary criticism is directed against the Estonian government, which is accused of avoiding public opinion and exerting unethical pressure on the handling of draft legislation. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural matters, calling into question whether the government's actions align with sound parliamentary political culture.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The primary criticism targets the actions of the Foreign Minister and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, specifically faulting them for distancing themselves from the issue of the revocation of voting rights and confining their role solely to providing information. The criticism is both policy-based (the inadequacy of the reform) and procedural (the failure to maintain allied relations).
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is directed at the planned policy of the Ministry of Justice and Digital Affairs, which is being criticized for potentially being motivated by cost-saving measures and ignoring the widespread public opinion regarding overly lenient sentencing. The criticism targets a political decision concerning early release without a judicial ruling.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the government coalition, which has introduced a bill favoring employers. Particularly sharp criticism is aimed at the Social Democrats, who are accused of neglecting the defense of workers' rights and opposing the Centre Party's motion to halt the proceedings. The criticism is primarily political and value-based, stressing the lack of compromise and the bill's suitability for only one side.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Direct opponents are not named, but the speaker raises a critical question regarding the results of the government's economic policy, emphasizing negative economic indicators and their social impact. The criticism is directed at the management of the economic situation and is policy- and results-based.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is indirectly criticizing the prevailing political direction, which advocates for the rapid phasing out of oil shale and frames this approach negatively. The criticism targets both the substance of the policy and the pace of its implementation, which is considered overly resolute.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the ruling coalition, which is being intensely criticized for procedural violations and political dishonesty. The coalition is accused of failing to process the amendments proposed by the opposition (the Center Party) purely for political reasons, even when the substance of those changes is necessary. Criticism is also directed at the coalition's motives, accusing them of unfairly changing the rules.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The primary criticism is aimed at the Social Democratic Party, and particularly at former Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets, who is accused of failing to address the specific issue at hand. The criticism is both politically acute and procedural, casting doubt on the sincerity of the bill introduced by the Social Democrats while in opposition. Furthermore, there is criticism regarding the underfunding and under-resourcing (or understaffing) of the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board), which targets the government's overall policy.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the current government, which is accused of ignoring the issue of low wages for cultural workers and cutting funding for the sports sector. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, suggesting that solutions will have to come from future governments, as "it seems we won't get very far" with the current administration.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the overconfidence displayed by the government or proponents of e-voting regarding their ability to guarantee security. It pushes back against the notion that Estonia is "such a capable player" that it can ensure a level of security that other developed nations have abandoned.
2025-04-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main confrontation is with the coalition parties, primarily the Reform Party, which is being criticized for the failure of its economic policy and for ignoring the problems faced by less affluent people. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the government's tax initiatives, which hit low-income earners particularly hard. The government’s economic policy is not trusted, and its inaction is considered egregious.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Lack of data
2025-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The main opponent is the Ministry of Education and Research, which is sharply criticized for its long-term inaction and failure to ensure the pipeline of new teachers. The criticism is policy- and procedural-based, especially regarding the imposition of penalty payments and the inability to solve the salary problem. The speaker expresses outrage over the ministry's decision to punish the local municipality instead of engaging in constructive cooperation.
2025-04-15
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The objection is directed against the actions or inactions of the government or the responsible official concerning the regulation of internet service prices. The criticism is policy-based, demanding specific progress and results in achieving the long-term goal (2035).
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is strong opposition toward the Reform Party and the Prime Minister, who stand accused of fearing to seek a new mandate and of the illegitimacy of their continued governance. Criticism is also aimed at their policies, particularly the unfair tax system and the way they are increasing security risks through disenfranchisement. The opposing side is further accused of selectively utilizing the opinions of the Chancellor of Justice.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is not enough data.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the coalition (Reform Party, Estonia 200) for introducing new taxes and for failing to implement the bank tax. Separately, the Social Democrats are criticized for their unclear and unreliable stance during votes. The criticism is intense and accuses the coalition of being driven purely by political motives (improving election results) and of pursuing initiatives based on unfounded security threats.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Strong criticism has been leveled against previous governments, who are blamed for creating a "major blunder" in the form of the car tax, and recommends simply scrapping the bill entirely. There is also criticism regarding the narrow focus of the European Union's equality program, which fails to encompass all minorities. The criticism is politically charged and focuses on political errors and the violation of constitutional principles.
2025-04-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker's primary criticism is aimed at the governing coalition, and specifically the Social Democratic Party (SDE), whom he accuses of betraying their principles and engaging in political opportunism (for instance, for the sake of retaining power in Tallinn). The criticism is both policy-based (concerning voting rights and religious freedom) and ethics-based (focusing on evasion, fudging the facts, and the "art of compromise"). He positions the Centre Party as the sole defender of the righteous stance in parliament.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the bill's proponent and the forces supporting it, criticizing the relevance of their arguments and their security assessments. The criticism is policy- and trust-driven, calling into question whether the current government trusts its advisory bodies, and pointing to a contradiction with the previous Minister of the Interior's positions.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the ruling triple coalition (the Reform Party, Estonia 200, and the Social Democrats), who are accused of worsening the demographic situation and economically exhausting families. The criticism is intense, focusing on political decisions (tax increases, benefit cuts) and the government's inaction. The Social Democrats are accused of hypocrisy, having supported the reduction of family benefits, and the government as a whole is blamed for "blindly" pushing through the opposition's ideas.
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main confrontation is aimed at the ruling coalition, particularly the Prime Minister and the Reform Party, whose political consistency is being called into question. The criticism is procedural, focusing on the discrepancy between promises (the Prime Minister's consent) and the actual voting behavior.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the government coalition as a whole and its leaders, especially the Minister of Climate and the Prime Minister. Criticism is aimed both at the policy itself (tax increases) and at procedural activities (lack of transparency, "troika" decisions, steamrolling). The attacks are intense, and compromise is ruled out, with demands for the minister's resignation and explanations from the prime minister.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
The primary criticism is aimed at the management of Tallinn Airport for incompetence and a 70% hike in fees, which runs contrary to European trends. The Estonian government is also being criticized for its inaction and its failure to ensure national connectivity. The criticism is intense and demands government intervention.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary opponents are coalition politicians and the bill's initiators, who face criticism regarding both the policy itself (the violation of fundamental rights) and their underlying motives (influencing elections, cynicism). The speaker accuses the opponents of collectively punishing law-abiding residents and, through their actions, posing a greater security threat to the state.
2025-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.
The main criticism is directed at the current government (Reform Party, Estonia 200) and the Tallinn city authorities. This criticism is policy- and performance-based, accusing them of inaction, budget cuts (specifically affecting extracurricular education), and halting crucial sports infrastructure projects (such as the Olympic swimming pool and football halls). The Minister of Education’s decision to reduce funding for extracurricular activities is also being heavily criticized.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opponent is the government coalition and the Minister of the Interior, who are being criticized for demagoguery, poor legislation, and the crude use of their parliamentary majority. The criticism is intense and multi-faceted, covering both the political (polarization) and the procedural (lack of impact analysis) levels, and accuses the government of implementing collective responsibility.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The criticism is directed at the government’s (or the Prime Minister’s) inaction or lack of clarity in defining the foreign policy direction, particularly concerning Estonia’s absence of a role in great power negotiations. The criticism is policy-based and moderate in intensity, raising questions aimed at achieving strategic clarity.
2025-02-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism targets the stances taken by Prime Minister Kristen Michal and the government concerning banking taxation, raising doubts about the veracity and adequacy of their arguments. The opposition is rooted in both policy and substance, centering on a comparison of these taxes with those in neighboring countries.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the Minister of Education and the government, who are being criticized for the failure of the Education Agreement, which neither resulted in the promised collective agreement nor resolved the teachers' concerns. The criticism is intense and politically charged, accusing the government of losing the trust of local municipalities and demanding the minister's resignation. The speaker rejects the minister's claim that the failure of the Education Agreement was due to political sabotage.
2025-02-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary meeting
The main targets of criticism are right-wing parties, who are accused of gaining a political double benefit by influencing election results and appealing to voters. Furthermore, the Social Democrats are being criticized for changing their position, which contradicts their earlier stance. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural violations and the undermining of democratic principles.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the prime minister and the governing coalition, who are criticized for their political rhetoric and ineffective scare tactics. The prime minister's actions are criticized for the use of whataboutism, which constitutes both substantive and procedural criticism. The intensity of the opposition is moderate, based on current ratings and procedural critiques.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The primary criticism focuses on the internal instability of the ruling coalition (Reform Party, SDE, Estonia 200) and the resulting threat to the country's governance. Furthermore, the Social Democrats are specifically criticized for their poor administration of the city of Tallinn, with critics pointing out that they are failing to manage the city effectively. The criticism is aimed at both the political level (the car tax) and the procedural level (public squabbling).
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opposition is aimed at the Foreign Minister and the ruling coalition, sharply criticizing the minister for incompetence, inadequate responses, and breaching parliamentary norms. The criticism also extends to the coalition partners' internal "bickering" during the foreign policy discussion, which highlights the government's internal conflicts.
2025-02-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The main targets of criticism are the government and, specifically, Interior Minister Lauri Läänemets, who is being accused of misjudgment and prioritizing coalition solidarity over public safety. The criticism is rooted in policy and procedure, highlighting internal contradictions within the government (with reference to the criticism leveled by Kaja Kallas and Mart Võrklaev). The speaker expresses disappointment that the coalition refuses to support the opposition’s constructive initiatives purely on political grounds.
2025-01-30
Fifteenth Estonian Parliament, fifth session, plenary session.
The primary opponents are the Reform Party and the prime minister, who stands accused of driving the constitutional amendment forward. The criticism is intense, focusing both on the initiators' motives (political self-gain) and the government's irresponsibility in ignoring the stability and economy of the state. A compromise is out of the question, as the Centre Party opposes the initiative on principle.
2025-01-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The criticism is directed straight at the ruling government coalition, which is made up of the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Eesti 200. The critique is based on both policy and procedure, specifically accusing the coalition of stripping large families of benefits and health insurance, as well as implementing a new car tax. It also criticizes the government's failure to transpose a directive on time, which resulted in a substantial fine.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
Strong opposition to the coalition majority, criticizing the methods and quality used to draft their political statements, and referring to the draft bill as "shoddy work" (or "defective"). The opposition targets both procedural and substantive shortcomings, particularly regarding the timing and legitimacy of the statement of support for Georgia.
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The main targets of criticism are the Prime Minister and the Reform Party, who are accused of violating political culture and using political technology tactics to suppress scandals. Criticism is also aimed at Kaja Kallas’s previous government for its passivity regarding demographic issues. The attacks are intense and target both procedure (failure to consult) and policy (tax hikes, benefit cuts).
2025-01-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Strong opposition is aimed at both the previous and the current government, who are accused of damaging family policy and denying the crisis. The previous prime minister's stance that low birth rates are normal was deemed irresponsible. The current coalition is criticized for cutting support for large families and introducing new taxes.
2025-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the previous government’s financial management, which resulted in situations where massive sums (100 million, 900 million) went unspent, even as efforts are underway to cut much smaller amounts. The criticism specifically targets shortcomings in policy and performance.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the governing coalition, accusing them of fostering a poor parliamentary culture where opposition initiatives are automatically voted down, regardless of their merit. The Ministry of Education is sharply criticized for ignoring the teacher succession crisis and engaging in displacement activities. The criticism is procedural and policy-based, not personal.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
Criticism is leveled against the government’s budget management (the Prime Minister, Kallas, Võrklaev), accusing them of engaging in abnormal practices and the misuse of funds. Furthermore, Urmas Reinsalu’s political claim regarding parliamentary support is criticized, and the characterization of the parliamentary situation as a "hostage crisis" is rejected, defending the right of the factions to act according to their convictions.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the government's policies, particularly regarding the steep increase in state fees, which is widely regarded as disproportionate and financially painful for the public. The criticism is strictly policy- and performance-based, calling into question the proportionality of the government's decisions.
2024-12-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the parties of the governing coalition, who are criticized sharply and personally (Mart, Akkermann). The criticism is directed both at specific policies (the car tax) and at their general activities (the loss of identity by Eesti 200, the ironic mention of Isamaa's rating). The legislative procedure is described as "agony."
2024-12-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The primary criticism is aimed at the current government and its ministers, accusing them of making poor decisions and shirking responsibility. A particular point of criticism is the tradition of blaming predecessors for every problem, with critics stressing that the current minister is accountable for the budget and all decisions. These attacks are based on policy and procedure, demanding that the errors be corrected.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Strong procedural and political opposition has been directed at specific government ministers (Kristina Kallas, Mart Võrklaev) and the budgetary conduct of the ministries. The criticism centers on a lack of transparency, the misallocation of priorities (teachers' salaries versus computer equipment), and financial impropriety.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the system governing the representation allowances for members of the government (ministers), noting that it is less transparent than the system used by members of the Riigikogu. The criticism is procedural and policy-based, focusing on unequal accountability requirements. The opposition targets systemic injustice, not individuals.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary targets of criticism are the state, the ministry, and the Minister of Education, who are accused of ignoring the opinions of local governments and teachers. The criticism is focused on policy and procedure, highlighting the division of responsibilities rather than the division of resources, and the absence of an impact analysis. No possibility for compromise is offered; instead, the recommendation is to completely reject the draft bill.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
The primary opposition is directed at the ruling coalition and its tax policy, which is criticized as unfair for taxing individuals instead of banks. Separately, the government's decision to forgo raising the alcohol tax is also criticized, with observers pointing to strong lobbying by alcohol producers and retailers.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the coalition, which stands accused of systematically rejecting the constructive proposals put forth by the opposition (the Center Party faction). This criticism is both procedural and political, exemplified by the budget vote where proposals were acknowledged as sound but were still voted down. Furthermore, the coalition is criticized for its refusal to adhere to the same principles of accountability that govern the rest of society.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the current government and Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna, who is being criticized for both domestic and foreign policy decisions. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of undermining economic confidence and straining Estonia-Israel relations. The opposition is based on policy and procedure, raising questions about the lack of consultation with allies.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the government coalition, especially the Reform Party (referencing the statements of Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi). The criticism is intense, focusing on the political substance (patching budget holes, burdening local governments) and procedural shortcomings (insufficient impact analysis). Support for the security tax bill and the basic education bill is categorically ruled out.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The main confrontation is directed against the Social Democratic Party and the Minister of the Interior, who are accused of indecisiveness, irresponsibility, and potential dishonesty. Isamaa’s actions in influencing the election results are labeled "brutal" and "a threat to Estonian security." The criticism targets both the political procedure and the value-based discrepancy.
2024-12-02
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The confrontation is directed both at the government’s tax policy and officials’ habit of routinely classifying information, which points to a broader distrust of public administration. The criticism is focused on specific policies and procedures, stressing that tax hikes and a lack of transparency complicate people’s lives. No specific political opponents are mentioned by name; instead, the focus is on criticizing systemic problems.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary opponents are the initiators of the draft legislation (implicitly, the ruling coalition), whose competence regarding security and constitutional issues is being challenged. The criticism targets both political decisions (specifically, the removal of voting rights, which generates resentment) and procedural deficiencies (the absence of an impact assessment and funding in the education sector). He/She also criticizes the session chair for granting a colleague too much time and engaging in a discussion with them over a point of procedure.
2024-11-20
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing.
The main opponents are the Minister of Social Affairs and the Social Insurance Board, who are being criticized for causing inconvenience to pensioners and for avoiding responsibility. The criticism is intense and focuses on the unreasonableness of administrative decisions and the disregard shown for the Prime Minister's opinion.
2024-11-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session
The criticism is aimed squarely at the government and the Ministry of Internal Affairs, who stand accused of insufficient action in the fight against scam calls. Critics point out that tangible results are scarce and the overall situation is deteriorating. This criticism is rooted in both policy failures and poor performance, demanding that the government adopt a much more serious approach and finally step outside its comfort zone.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The speaker sharply criticizes the ruling coalition (the Reform Party, the Social Democratic Party, and Eesti 200) for its inability to draft a budget and cooperate with the opposition. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the government’s priorities and failed economic policies, which are leading the country into a "deep deadlock." Specific ministers (Ligi, the Minister of the Interior) are also criticized for providing vague or evasive answers.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The primary conflict is with the government, particularly the Minister of Finance (over budget integrity) and Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets. Criticism is directed at political decisions (tax increases) and the Interior Minister's persistent pressure on the local Orthodox Church, which is considered a potential infringement of the constitution.
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main conflict is with the coalition, which is being criticized for rejecting positive initiatives and for its illogical behavior. The criticism is directed at the coalition's policies, which focus on raising taxes and excise duties, and quadrupling the specialist doctor's visit co-pay. The speaker doubts the coalition will take any initiative and believes their arguments for opposition don't hold water.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the government/prime minister, who is sharply criticized for economic failure. The criticism is performance-based, focusing on the question of why Estonia has fared the worst in Europe, despite the already difficult circumstances.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The opposition targets the government's budget policy, specifically the Social Democratic Party, which is accused of abandoning its ideology and principles by implementing cuts that disproportionately affect the poorest. The government is also criticized for neglecting its strategy for revitalizing rural areas.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The primary confrontation is directed against the actions of the Minister and the government, criticizing both the Minister's superior attitude regarding the selection of questions posed by the opposition and the constitutional incompatibility of the activity-based budget. The criticism is both procedural (the attitude/stance) and substantive (the budget and security).
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is the triple coalition led by the Reform Party (the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, Estonia 200), which is accused of the deliberate harassment of population groups. The criticism is intense and focuses both on political decisions (taxation, benefit cuts) and poor operational management within the Social Insurance Board. The possibility of compromise is not mentioned; instead, the demand is for the dignified treatment of the elderly.
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the government, which is accused of suppressing the issue and having special relationships with banks. Furthermore, the Social Democratic Party is criticized for political inconsistency, as they do not support the current taxation idea despite having previously proposed a similar measure. The criticism is based on both policy and motives.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the government led by the Reform Party, whose decisions are heavily criticized and who is held directly responsible for the reduction in pensioners' income. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the negative financial impact of the taxation measures.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary opposition is aimed at the government and the Reform Party, who face criticism for consistently breaking their promises and raising taxes. The criticism is intense, questioning the government’s motives for using the security slogan as a cover to plug budget deficits. Adversaries are also accused of drafting the budget in a substandard and non-transparent manner.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the minister due to insufficient action and limited resources in policing. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, demanding a strategic shift from reactive to proactive measures and an increase in resources.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main confrontation is with the government and the responsible minister, who is being sharply criticized for the substance of the policy. The criticism is policy-based, accusing the government of inconsistency regarding family policy and warning that the measures will result in greater long-term costs for the state. The opposition is intense, involving accusations of cynicism.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The primary confrontation is directed against Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna, who is being criticized both for a foreign policy decision and for lying to the public. The criticism is intense, ranging from political issues to personal accusations. Furthermore, the Prime Minister is being demanded to take a clear stance regarding the internal disagreement.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at major telecommunications operators (Telia, Elisa) over their high prices and profits, as well as at state institutions (the Competition Authority, TTJA) for their failure to act and their acceptance of market dictation. The speaker dismisses arguments claiming that the limited number of operators prevents intervention, labeling it "a truly pathetic excuse." Furthermore, he criticizes the operators' preference for comparing Estonia to Finland rather than Latvia or Lithuania, given the significant difference in wage levels.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker is strongly in opposition, criticizing the coalition's political hypocrisy and inaction. The criticism is aimed at the coalition's voting behavior, which has repeatedly rejected the Center Party's social and economic proposals. The disagreement is grounded in both policy and procedural matters, accusing the coalition of voting down the opposition's good ideas.
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The primary opposition is aimed at the ruling coalition (the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Estonia 200), particularly the Reform Party, which is being blamed for the poor economic situation since 2021. The criticism is intense and focuses on the political failure regarding the freezing of civil servants' salaries. The speaker also references former Prime Minister Kaja Kallas's previous remarks concerning the salary expectations of public sector workers.
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the previous decision to close the New York Consulate General, criticizing the cost argument used to justify it ("too expensive for us"). Current foreign policy leadership is also criticized regarding the UN vote, citing a procedural error and a failure to synchronize with allies.
2024-09-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The opposition maintains a strong stance directed against the ruling coalition (the Reform Party, Estonia 200, and the Social Democratic Party), which they accuse of worsening the situation for families and automatically dismissing the opposition’s good ideas. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on budget cuts and the introduction of new taxes, and is also aimed at specific ministers (Kristina Kallas, Riisalo).
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Criticism is aimed at the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (MKM), whose proposal to assign additional duties to the Chancellor of Justice caught many off guard. The criticism is both procedural and substantive, questioning whether the proposal was previously discussed and coordinated, and whether it poses a threat to the quality of the work.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The criticism is aimed at the government’s policy regarding pay raises for internal security personnel, as police officers, rescue workers, and border guards will not receive a salary increase for the second consecutive year. The opposition is political and focuses on failed resource management, which prevents the police from carrying out their duties.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the state's current communication strategy, which focuses excessively on frightening people with the prospect of military conflict. The critique is policy-based and targets strategic inefficiency, not individuals.
2024-09-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, press briefing.
The main criticism is aimed at the inaction of the minister and the government regarding the fulfillment of promised salary increases within the internal security sector. The criticism is based on both policy and performance, addressing the motivation of personnel who are vital in the context of the nation's internal and external security. Former Prime Minister Kaja Kallas is also mentioned in relation to the long-term expectations for wage hikes (specifically the year 2028).
2024-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the ministries that presented old and insufficient arguments against the draft bill, and those who failed to conduct a proper impact analysis. Specifically, he/she finds the Ministry of Education’s argument that the learning process would suffer due to one extra day implausible. Concern is also expressed that the draft bill might be rejected merely because it was submitted by an opposition force.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponent is Minister of Education Kristina Kallas, whose competence is being called into question. She is being accused of covering up the facts and allowing negotiations to stall. Criticism is also aimed at the Prime Minister, who retained the minister in her post in the new government. The opposition is warning of a potential new teachers' strike, which they argue would demonstrate the minister’s unsuitability for the job.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The primary opposition is aimed at the Social Democratic Party (SDE), criticizing their political actions in both the previous and the current coalition. The criticism is intense and policy-based, accusing the SDE of implementing tax increases and social cuts that run counter to social democratic ideology. The confrontation is ideological and based on political outcomes.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main opponents are the ruling coalition (the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, Estonia 200) and the new Prime Minister, Kristen Michal. They are being criticized for stifling democratic debate and suppressing the opposition. The criticism is directed both at the procedures (the bundling of amendments) and the substance (unconstitutional bills). Compromise is ruled out because the drafts are considered fundamentally flawed.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
A strong opposition stance is directed both at the former prime minister (due to his unpopularity) and the new government. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, casting doubt on the correlation between the new government’s promises and its actual actions regarding public sector cuts. Regarding the former prime minister, it was emphasized that 70% of the population demanded his resignation.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
A strong backlash is aimed at the coalition, which is being criticized for ignoring over 160 amendments put forward by the opposition (the Centre Party). Criticism is also leveled at procedural manipulations, as the coalition is attempting to find "interesting interpretations of the law" in order to implement the legislation faster than the law actually allows. The coalition’s response to the opposition is widely regarded as "standard fare" and ineffective.
2024-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
The primary targets of opposition are Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the government. Criticism is aimed both at Kaja Kallas's personal conduct (her trip to Europe, which is detrimental to the health of the coalition) and at the government's political decisions regarding education, which are widely viewed as unreasonable and exacerbating existing problems. The resistance is intense and manifests as accusations concerning problems created by the government.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The confrontation is directed at the bill's initiators, who are being criticized for potentially failing to grasp the tensions that the bill's adoption would cause in relations between Estonia and Georgia. The criticism targets their political judgment and their ability to foresee the consequences.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main opponent is the governing coalition, particularly the minister and the prime minister, who are being criticized for procedural errors and a lack of coordination. The criticism is intense, suggesting disrespect toward the Riigikogu and political calculation (the postponement of unpopular decisions due to the elections). The criticism targets both the substance of the policy and the operational organization of the government.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker is fiercely opposed to the ruling coalition, leveling sharp criticism against the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Estonia 200. The critique targets both the substance of the policy (tax hikes) and the procedural side ("steamroller politics," the voting down of opposition proposals). A specific appeal is directed at the Social Democrats and Estonia 200, urging them to consider their constituents' opposition to the tax.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main criticism is aimed at the Foreign Minister for his personal conduct and diplomatic impropriety in Georgia, which has been described as "wild" and "bizarre." Criticism is also directed at the lack of internal government coordination, since the Prime Minister confirmed that the incident was the minister's solo act.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The main criticism is directed at the Minister of Economic Affairs and IT, whose travel expenses are considered excessively high compared to those of other ministers. The criticism focuses on personal responsibility and the unreasonable spending of state money, demanding public explanations.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponents are the Ministry of Education and Research (Minister Kristina Kallas) and the ruling coalition, who are being criticized for political incompetence (specifically, the lack of a plan to resolve the teacher shortage) and failed negotiations. The criticism is intense, citing the failed motion of no confidence and accusing the government of shifting responsibility onto local municipalities. Colleague Jürgen Ligi is also criticized for his patronizing tone and for wasting time.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
The primary conflict is with the Reform Party, criticizing their fixation on eliminating the tax hump, which is exacerbating the budget deficit. The criticism is based on policy and performance, highlighting the government's internal contradictions regarding wage policy. The opponent's views are characterized as unrealistic and demonstrating a lack of understanding of the current budgetary situation.
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The main confrontation is with the Reform Party, whose election promise regarding the abolition of the tax hump is considered irresponsible and an ideological fixation. Criticism is also directed at the government as a whole, as they are bringing a draft bill to the floor requiring the introduction of new taxes during an economic recession. The speaker also points to the nervousness of the representative of the Finance Committee, hinting at the draft bill's potential for internal conflict.
2024-05-27
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the government's fiscal policy and specifically targets Tiit Riisalo, the Minister of Economic Affairs and Information Technology. Riisalo is being criticized for disregarding the views of social partners (employers and trade unions) and for aggressively pushing through the reform. The criticism is both policy-based and procedural, highlighting the lack of consensus.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The confrontation is directed against the ruling coalition, specifically the Reform Party and the Social Democratic Party, who are being criticized for breaking election promises and for potentially damaging policies (the freezing of indexation). The criticism is intense and focuses on political credibility and the fulfillment of promises.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the substance of the policy, questioning the actual benefit of the new system for parents and local governments, particularly in the context of Tallinn. There are no personal or procedural attacks; instead, the focus is on the practical feasibility of the proposed solutions.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The main targets of criticism are the initiators of the suffrage bill (Isamaa) and the Prime Minister. Isamaa is accused of scoring political points, and the Prime Minister is accused of bypassing parliament when addressing the bank tax issue. The criticism is both procedural (infringement of the constitution) and substantive (collective punishment).
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The confrontation is aimed squarely at the government and the prime minister, who are being sharply criticized over the recession and high inflation. The criticism is based on both policy and results, accusing the government of ignoring deep-seated economic problems and driving the country into a dire situation. In response, they are demanding a concrete plan from the government.
2024-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed against the Government of the Republic and the coalition, who are accused of politically pressuring experts and violating the promises made in the coalition agreement. The criticism targets both the substance of the policy (insufficient salary increases) and the procedure (delayed payments and the ignoring of expert opinions). The speaker considers the government's actions toward teachers to be "ridicule and bullying."
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The main criticism is directed at the Minister of Education and the coalition, who are accused of denying responsibility and defending systemic issues. The Minister himself has been personally criticized for shifting responsibility onto school heads, local authorities, and the opposition. It is emphasized that the no-confidence motion is supported by three different opposition parties, which demonstrates the broad basis of the criticism.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main confrontation is directed against the governing bodies of the government and the Riigikogu (Parliament), criticizing their political motives and procedural decisions. Opponents are accused of spreading disinformation and running a political campaign (specifically referencing Lauri Läänemets). The criticism is both policy-based and procedural.
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The opposition is directed against the government formed by the Reform Party, Eesti 200, and the Social Democratic Party. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on specific unpopular measures (cuts to family benefits, taxation of pensions) and the government’s lack of trustworthiness. It is emphasized that the government targeted both large families and pensioners.
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The strong opposition is aimed at the policies of the government, particularly the Reform Party, criticizing both the planned registration fee and the proposal to eliminate the tax hump. The critique is policy- and budget-driven, while also offering alternative sources of funding.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is aimed at the coalition and the committee, who stand accused of systematically limiting the opposition's rights and violating parliamentary rules of procedure. The criticism is intense, ranging from procedural matters (such as refusing to accept breaks, interpellations, and draft legislation) to accusations of introducing elements of a "dictatorship." The speaker shows no readiness to compromise, either on the issue of e-elections or regarding the coalition's methods of procedure.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
The primary opposition is directed at Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and her rhetoric, which is considered panic-inducing and unconstructive. The criticism targets the government’s communication policy, which, in the speaker’s assessment, harms the state by interfering with rational behavior. He contrasts the positions originating from Kallas with the more moderate views of her party colleagues, Marko Mihkelson and Urmas Paet.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary opposition is directed at the government and the responsible minister, who are being criticized for failing to provide solutions and setting the wrong priorities. Criticism is particularly sharp regarding the defunding of the School Sports Union and the Jõud Sports Union, as well as the freezing of salary increases for the public sector (police officers, rescuers, and cultural workers). The criticism is policy- and results-based, focusing on the government’s failure to improve the situation.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the government or the responsible agencies, focusing on political errors that undermine the quality of education, as well as procedural deficiencies. Particular emphasis is placed on the administrative failure regarding the timely payment of teachers' salary supplements, with questions raised about how to prevent this from happening again.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary opponents are the government and the Ministry of Education and Research, who are accused of inaction, avoiding responsibility, and shifting the blame onto others (specifically the City of Tallinn or local municipalities). The criticism is intense and accusatory, labeling the government's conduct as shameful and ridiculous, particularly regarding the 17-euro salary increase.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main criticism is aimed at the governing coalition, especially the Reform Party, regarding tax hikes and the breaking of pension promises, which critics are calling "just another pre-election lie." The Prime Minister is criticized for focusing on the past, even as the government's current policies are ineffective and place a heavy burden on the public. The Health Minister's proposed sugar tax was deemed unconvincing, especially when contrasted with the concrete arguments put forward by businesses.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary opponent is the government and its coalition partners, who are criticized for breaking promises and implementing incompetent social policy. Separately, the coalition partners are accused of seeking political gain during the teachers' strike. The criticism is intense, touching upon both political decisions (the taxation of pensions) and ethical behavior (distrust).
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
Strong opposition is directed at the governing coalition, particularly Eesti 200, due to internal contradictions and the breaking of election promises. The Reform Party and the previous government (Reform Party, Isamaa, SDE) are also criticized for creating budget deficits and misleading voters. The criticism is rooted in issues of policy and credibility, accusing the rulers of believing in their own infallibility.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The confrontation is directed against the government's financial policy, criticizing the budget deficit and the inability to secure funding for critical sectors (teachers' salaries, healthcare). The criticism is policy-driven and intense, expressing deep skepticism about the prospect of finding money in the future. The core criticism is that the government lacks a plan for covering major expenditures.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The main opponents are the Reform Party and Regional Minister Madis Kallas. Criticism targets both procedural violations (the Prime Minister's irrelevant comments) and political decisions (local government funding). The intensity of the attacks is high, casting doubt on the government's honesty and fairness, and accusing them of punishing the most capable.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Strong and direct opposition to the Government of the Republic and the Prime Minister. The criticism is aimed at specific political moves (the cutting of family benefits, tax hikes) and the government’s overall stance on supporting families. The government is accused of undermining families' sense of security and frightening the public with talk of war.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
Opposition is aimed at the inaction of the government (or the minister) and the unrealistic pace of the education reform, which fails to address the teacher shortage. Criticism is also directed at the Rajaleidja center's alleged refusal to take doctors' opinions into account concerning children with special educational needs (SEN). The criticism is procedural and policy-based, rather than personal.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the Minister of Education (Kristina Kallas) and the government, who are accused of lacking a long-term strategy and being unable to resolve critical issues. The criticism is focused on policy and performance, centering specifically on the absence of solutions for the teacher pipeline and the shortage of support specialists. It is also highlighted that the struggle against the legacy of the Soviet Union continues 33 years later.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The primary target is the government and the prime minister, whose tax policies are sharply criticized and labeled as unfair. The criticism is policy-driven, centering on tax hikes (VAT, income tax, excise duties, car tax) and the reduction of social benefits, all of which are deepening the economic recession. The government is accused of blaming the people for the economic downturn instead of focusing on the excessive profits made by banks.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The chief adversary is the Government of the Republic, headed by the Reform Party, which is being blamed for acting as the biggest drag on the economy and for causing the current crisis. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, focusing heavily on tax hikes and a complete lack of vision. The government's approach—taking money away from the populace between elections—is being labeled a cynical strategy.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opponent is Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the government's tax policy. The criticism is intense and direct, accusing the Prime Minister of lying regarding the opposition's supposed lack of alternatives. The opposition is based on both policy grounds (the car tax) and procedural grounds (the failure to involve interest groups).
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The primary opposition is aimed at the government, which is being criticized both for freezing the salaries of Police and Border Guard Board (PPA) employees and for internal divisions (specifically, the contradictory statements made by the Prime Minister and a minister regarding how long the salary freeze would last). The government is also facing criticism for its initial offer to teachers, which was widely viewed as insufficient and insulting.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
A direct internal confrontation is not being articulated. Criticism is directed at an external threat factor, namely the political uncertainty of the United States and its impact on NATO collective defense, which is compelling Europe to re-evaluate its own defense.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The criticism targets the bill's drafters and proponents, who are accused of inaccuracies and poor preparation, with critics labeling the draft "raw or incomplete." Specific points of criticism include restricting the pool of loan recipients and the unequal treatment of twins. This puts the critics at odds with Jaak Valge regarding the scope of eligible applicants. The criticism is rooted in policy and procedural concerns, ultimately leading the Centre Party faction to withhold support for the bill.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The confrontation is directed at the government and the Reform Party, who are accused of implementing a policy that rules out free public transport. The criticism is intense and focuses on the detrimental economic effects of the policy and the absence of promised investment plans. The opponent is further charged with having dishonest motives.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Strong opposition has been leveled against the Government of the Republic and the Prime Minister, who are being criticized for specific cuts to family policy. The criticism is policy-driven, accusing the government of taking actions that contradict the constitutional objective of ensuring the preservation of the nation. The government’s actions are described as undermining the sense of security for families and exacerbating the demographic situation.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main opposition is directed against the actions of the Prime Minister and the government, criticizing their failure to deliver on goals set in the past as well as the promises outlined in the current coalition agreement. The criticism centers on the effectiveness and credibility of their policies.
2024-01-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the party that has governed for years and the Ministry of Education and Research, who are accused of lacking a clear plan and focusing excessively on cost optimization. The criticism is policy- and results-based, especially regarding the term "school network restructuring," which masks school closures. The speaker warns against hasty closure decisions but acknowledges the inevitability of reorganizing the school network.
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main adversaries are the coalition MPs, who are accused of rushing the bill through and flat-out voting down substantive proposals. Criticism is also aimed at the newspaper's editorial, which attempts to pin the blame on the Centre Party. The opposition is intense and focuses on both procedural and substantive errors.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The criticism is indirectly aimed at the inaction displayed by both the reform implementers and local authorities (specifically Tallinn and Ida-Virumaa) concerning the replacement and support of teachers. This critique is policy-driven, centering on inefficient planning and the failure to provide solutions.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
Strong opposition is aimed at the government's regional policy, which is widely viewed as punitive and unfair toward local municipalities. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the financial damage that the government’s decisions are inflicting upon well-performing local authorities. To bolster this opposition, critical leaders of local governments are being quoted, such as the heads of Saue and Mulgi municipalities.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The main confrontation is with the government, which is being criticized for rushing through tax reforms and failing to give them sufficient consideration, resulting in negative consequences for the economy. The criticism is both substantive and procedural, emphasizing that the government is not taking into account all possible associated consequences.