By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

The collaborative style stresses the party's internal unity ("The united Centre Party"). There are no references to a readiness for compromise or inter-party cooperation; the focus is purely on oppositional criticism.

The collaborative style is demonstrated by quoting a colleague (former Minister of Finance Mart Võrklaev) to support the argument that there was no budgetary necessity for closing the Kopli station. There is no direct indication of openness to compromise with the government; instead, the government is being required to admit and rectify its mistakes.

Insufficient data

The speaker is participating in the plenary debate, posing questions to the rapporteur. He/She supports the bill, which is already under parliamentary procedure, aimed at reducing the Riigikogu’s (Estonian Parliament’s) expense allowances, indicating a readiness to back legislation initiated by colleagues. Openness to compromise is not mentioned; rather, a fundamental expansion of government expenditures is being demanded.

Cooperation is emphasized primarily with local governments and key stakeholders (teachers, parents)—groups that the speaker believes the state has previously ignored. He/She represents the position of the Association of Estonian Cities and Municipalities, which refused to endorse the draft legislation. There is no information available regarding whether a compromise is being sought with the coalition or other parliamentary factions.

The speaker is skeptical of the government and asked the minister whether he really needs to remain in a government where nobody listens to him, referencing the rejection of the Social Democratic Party's proposals. This indicates a lack of trust regarding the coalition's ability to cooperate.

The speaker highlights the lack of cooperation and expresses deep pessimism about the coalition's readiness to work together. He points out that even highly constructive proposals put forward by the Center Party faction are voted down by the coalition, demonstrating the failure of their joint efforts.

There is no direct mention of cross-party cooperation; the speaker is clearly operating in an opposition oversight capacity. A single query was submitted by multiple individuals ("we submitted"), suggesting internal collaboration within their political faction. There is no expressed willingness to compromise; instead, the focus remains squarely on exposing the government's failings.

Cooperation is taking place within the faction (the Centre Party cannot support the draft legislation), and reference is made to other opposition colleagues (Lauri Laats). It is important to rely on the representative organization of local governments (ELVL) to strengthen the arguments, which demonstrates a willingness to cooperate with interest groups.

The style of cooperation in this context is deficient and confrontational, focusing on highlighting the inefficiency of the opposing party (SDE). It is ironically noted that the Social Democrats require the support of the Center Party (Keskerakond) to defend their own principles. Direct cooperation is not being offered; rather, principled clarity is demanded.

Not enough data