By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

Total Sessions: 8

Fully Profiled: 8

2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker demonstrates detailed knowledge regarding the complexity and cost of sustainability reporting (ESG), describing its impact on supply chains, gender balance, and the necessity of expensive consultants. Furthermore, the speaker highlighted their understanding of the social and economic ramifications of tax hikes (VAT, income tax), citing the unemployment figures (over 64,000) and inflation. Specific questions were also raised concerning the effect of biofuel prices and the legitimacy of RMK (State Forest Management Centre) granting building rights.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker demonstrates detailed knowledge of the pain points in regional policy, highlighting the income disparity in Southeast Estonia (27% below the average) and the discriminatory nature of banking loan conditions. Furthermore, he/she is knowledgeable about the bureaucracy in the agricultural sector (the overlap of inspections by PRIA, PTA, and the Environmental Board) and the assessments made by security institutions (KAPO) regarding the threats posed by immigration.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates expertise in energy policy, citing specific data on the volume of oil shale electricity production and its effect on electricity prices (a 17% lower price). They are familiar with the speculative nature of CO2 trading and are capable of detailed analysis of the wording in draft legislation concerning gender balance and underrepresented genders, insisting on precise terminology. Furthermore, they are knowledgeable about the procedures for processing environmental permits and the risks associated with conflicts of interest (e.g., involving wind farm developers).
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates deep expertise in the energy sector, utilizing technical terminology such as fluidized bed technology, biomass co-firing, and the reduction of CO2 emissions. Specific economic indicators are referenced, including 200 million euros for balancing costs, and Professor Alar Konist of Tallinn University of Technology is cited. Furthermore, the speaker exhibits knowledge regarding structural reforms in judicial administration and the reduction of bureaucracy.
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The speakers display a detailed knowledge of the provisions of the Name Act and the overall legal framework, citing specific sections and requirements pertaining to given names. The second speaker, in particular, demonstrates a command of legal philosophy and social theory, contrasting legal clarity and common sense with postmodern and Marxist concepts of gender as a construct.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker demonstrates expertise on the topics of freedom of speech and lawmaking, referencing Estonia’s position globally and showing interest in the progress of drafting the hate speech law. Specific sources and individuals (Postimees, Chief Prosecutor Astrid Asi) are used to illustrate their point.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of energy policy and economics, criticizing the operation of the Nord Pool exchange, the costs of grid investments, and the methodology for connection fees. Knowledge concerning the processing of special spatial plans by local governments and the specific environmental impacts of wind farms (infrasound, shadow flicker, bird migration) is also highlighted. Questions are raised regarding Article 154 of the Constitution and the regulation of unemployment insurance benefits.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the fields of banking and competition supervision. They specifically reference statistics from banks' annual reports, noting the price differential for services between Estonia, and Sweden and Finland. They are also concerned about the impact of the new competition supervision procedure on the workload of the Competition Authority and the administrative courts.