By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

The legislative focus is aimed at opposing draft legislation that increases administrative and tax burdens, particularly concerning sustainability reporting and tax increases. The politician supports postponing the deadline for the reporting obligation but demands the complete abolition of the requirement. Furthermore, attention is focused on examining the activities of state-owned enterprises (RMK), the impact analyses of new regulations, and control mechanisms (fines).

It focuses on demanding political solutions, rather than specific legislative bills. The main political priorities include directing state investments to Southeast Estonia, implementing a regional special coefficient in education financing, and establishing guarantee mechanisms to improve loan conditions in peripheral areas.

The legislative focus is currently directed towards environmental regulations (specifically, the designation of compensation and mitigation zones, and conflicts of interest in wind farm development), energy policy, and the precise wording of draft legislation concerning gender balance. The speaker primarily operates as a critical watchdog, raising suspicions about conflicts of interest and questioning the connection between draft laws and high-profile misconduct cases (such as that involving Taavi Rõivas).

The legislative focus is currently on analyzing the reform of court administration (the creation of the Council for Court Administration and Development), specifically addressing the reform's substance and its impact on reducing bureaucracy. The main political priority is amending the national energy strategy to support the oil shale energy sector and invest in a new power plant based on fluidized bed technology.

The primary legislative focus is on the implementation and interpretation of the Name Act, especially concerning the requirements set for a forename and its correspondence with gender. The discussants are either in the role of the questioner (examining the limits of an official's discretionary power) or the claimant (insisting that the Ministry of the Interior must set boundaries to ensure the name aligns with the gender).

The legislative focus is currently centered on monitoring the development of the hate speech law (the Hate Speech Act) and demanding reports on its progress. The speaker operates primarily as a critical interrogator, requiring the government to provide clarifications regarding the law's evolution and its potential impact on fundamental rights.

The legislative focus is currently on opposing Bill 541 (the Renewable Energy Acceleration Act), as it restricts the rights of local governments and permits the waiving of detailed site planning. Furthermore, there is interest in the draft legislation concerning the abolition of the security tax and the regulation of electricity excise duty.

The legislative focus is on analyzing the impact of legal amendments, particularly those concerning the regulation of banking activities and the establishment of a new competition supervision procedure. The speaker is a meticulous critic who demands clarity regarding both the regulation's effect on banks and the potential increase in the administrative burden on the Competition Authority.