By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

The speaker is highly active during the plenary session, posing short and pointed questions to both the presenters and the minister, and also delivering one long, ideologically charged speech. This pattern of activity demonstrates a focus on the detailed scrutiny of legislation and oppositional questioning across multiple topics within a single day's sitting.

All speeches were delivered during a single plenary session (2025-05-19), which indicates active participation in government information sessions and political debates. The pattern of activity is focused on directly posing questions to the Prime Minister and ministers, as well as presenting longer critical viewpoints.

The speaker was highly active during the plenary sessions of the Riigikogu, raising ten questions and comments over the course of two days (May 14 and 15) concerning various bills and topics. These questions were posed in rapid succession, which points to active engagement in the debates and thorough substantive scrutiny of the proposed legislation.

The speaker is active during the plenary session, participating both by posing questions to the minister and the committee rapporteur, and by delivering a longer, substantive political statement. This pattern of activity includes inquiring about the specifics of concrete draft legislation (such as bureaucracy or input for reform) as well as presenting broad political positions.

Not enough data

The pattern of activity shows participation in the Riigikogu plenary session, submitting an oral question to the minister.

The speaker's activity patterns indicate a focus on bill debates during the Riigikogu plenary sessions, delivering both lengthy opposition speeches and posing several pointed questions to presenters and ministers. Personal visits to rural areas are also mentioned, undertaken to understand the concerns of local residents.

The pattern of activity consists solely of asking two questions during the plenary session, which points to active involvement in legislative debates. Both inquiries were directed straight at the responsible parties (the minister and the commission representative), seeking clarity and accountability.