By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

There is no direct confrontation with specific political groups. The criticism is indirect and ironic, aimed instead at the disappearance of traditional expectations (white Christmas, snowmobiles) due to climate change.

The main confrontation is with the coalition and the Ministry of Climate, both of whom are accused of implementing unconstitutional legislation and "bad and politicized science." The criticism is intense, alleging that the government is weakening energy security and ruining Estonia's export industries, thereby serving the interests of the enemy.

The confrontation is directed at those who promote the hate speech law and use the labeling of speech as hate speech to suppress criticism. The criticism is intense and accusatory, ranging from criticizing political instruments (hate speech) to highlighting the personal work failures ("shoddy performance") of a high state official (the Prosecutor General). The opponent is directly accused of "hostility toward freedom of speech" and suppressing the free exchange of ideas.

The main opponents are the governing coalition and the liberals, who are accused of embracing far-left green policies and deliberately dismantling the economy. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, arguing that the government's actions are aimed at destroying competitiveness.

The primary adversary is the government and its ministers, who are sharply criticized for breaking promises and undermining legal certainty regarding family benefits. Criticism is also aimed at the government's inaction (infra-sound studies have not been conducted) and its submission to international pressure concerning natural resources. The opposition is intense, accusing the government of failing to do its job and sacrificing national interests to serve the interests of Brussels or the oligarchs.

The primary opposition is aimed at the executive branch and the government, particularly the Minister of Defence, who faces criticism for a lack of preparation and poor information quality. There is also strong criticism regarding the ethical issues of politicians and the appointment of corrupt individuals to high-ranking positions (EU posts). The criticism directed at opponents is multifaceted, covering political, procedural, and personal/ethical aspects (for instance, labeling the leader of an allied nation a fascist).

The main confrontation is directed at the government, specifically the Prime Minister and Defense Minister Pevkur, whose messages are considered contradictory and dismissive. The criticism is intense and focuses on the government's inability to ensure the functioning of national defense early warning systems. Those in power are accused of ignoring a situation that endangers NATO's early warning capabilities.

There is not enough data.

Criticism is aimed at the effectiveness of the government's tax policy, particularly regarding excise revenue collection. The positive effect of raising excise duties on the state budget is being called into question, suggesting that the resistance is rooted in the policy itself.