By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The style of collaboration during the session with colleagues or the presiding officer is personal and humorous, demonstrated by the request for a water bottle and mutual banter. There is no data concerning inter-party or legislative cooperation.

The cooperation manifested through the citing of independent positions from the Riigikogu's Legal and Analysis Department, which are used to reinforce the opposition's arguments. There are no references to a willingness to compromise or cross-party cooperation with the government; instead, the necessity for intervention by the Chancellor of Justice, the President, or the Supreme Court is stressed.

No data available

The entire speech focuses on fierce criticism of the government's policy and highlighting its consequences. There are no references to cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-party action.

The speaker positively references previous cross-party cooperation in creating the decision on "fraternal, robust family benefits," which was subsequently revoked by the current government. In the present context, the style is confrontational and aimed at challenging the government's actions.

No data available

Not enough data.

The interaction style is formal and geared towards gathering information, respectfully addressing the rapporteur for clarification. This constitutes a standard legislative interaction aimed at obtaining information.

The style of cooperation is formal and institutional, restricted solely to posing questions to the minister during the plenary session. The records contain no indication of cross-party collaboration or a willingness to compromise.