By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The main adversaries are rapporteurs and politicians who support centralized urban planning and e-voting, and who are accused of employing Soviet-era methods. The criticism is ideological and intense, referring to their activities as having a "communist impression." Furthermore, law enforcement agencies are sharply criticized for their "sluggish and lazy attitude" when investigating vote-buying crimes.

The main opponents are the government parties (Eesti 200, Social Democrats) and the big businessman Oleg Ossinovski. The criticism is intense and directed both at morality (the acceptance of donations) and inaction (the lack of an investigation). The speaker accuses the government parties of being in the oligarch's pocket and of having connections that prevent the enforcement of sanctions.

The main opponent is the Prosecutor's Office and its leadership (Prosecutor General Parmas, former Prosecutor General Lavly Perling), who are accused of systemic politicization and the implementation of double standards. The criticism is intense, focusing on procedural injustice, political ruination, and the squandering of state resources. The opposition is absolute, accusing the Prosecutor's Office of serving political objectives.

The primary criticism is aimed at the Reform Party, targeting both their historical role in attempts to abolish mandatory military service and their current defense planning. The criticism is intense, accusing opponents of forfeiting the training of men equivalent to an entire division and thereby weakening national defense. The attacks are primarily policy-driven and focused on evaluating outcomes.

The opposition’s stance is extremely strong and targeted directly at the Prime Minister and the Reform Party, who stand accused of lying, susceptibility to blackmail, and concealing Russian business dealings. The criticism is both personal and ethical, ranging from accusations that coalition partners were financed by Oleg Ossinovski to the demand that the Prime Minister take a polygraph test. Compromise is ruled out entirely, as they are demanding the immediate resignation of the Prime Minister.

The primary targets are Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, the Reform Party, and the ruling coalition. The criticism is intense and primarily ethical, accusing them of continuing the "blood business" and circumventing sanctions. Also under attack is Oleg Ossinovski, the major businessman who funds the governing parties, who is labeled as corrupt and a sanctions-evading "elephant in the room."

The confrontation is directed at the current leaders of energy policy, who are accused of promoting unrealistic and unstable solutions (solar and wind energy). The criticism is policy-based, emphasizing that their plans will lead to a decline in the standard of living and the collapse of industry. He praises former Finance Minister Martin Helme for securing a 1000 MW reserve, contrasting this achievement with the current situation.

The main opponents are the Social Democrats (mentioning Ossinovski) and Eesti 200, who are accused of destroying the nation-state and constructing an international dystopia. The criticism is intense and ideological, charging the opposition with the degradation of women and the artificial importation of terrorism risk. Compromise is ruled out, as this constitutes an existential cultural conflict.

The main opponents are the parties of the governing coalition (the Social Democrats and the Reform Party), who are criticized both for changes to the tax system and for education policy. The criticism is intense and policy-based, accusing the government of eradicating the language and culture of Ukrainians.

The main opponent is the Reform Party and the Minister of Finance, who face criticism over controversial policies (freedom versus nudging) and an economically hazardous tax package. The critique is grounded in both policy and ideology, accusing the opponents of implementing measures that endanger private property and erode the public’s sense of security. The attacks are intense, often linking the opponents' actions directly to extremist ideologies.