By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets
Total Sessions: 10
Fully Profiled: 10
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
No data available.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
Not enough data.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker is active in the Riigikogu plenary sittings, submitting interpellations and questions, focusing on current and pending issues. Earlier participation in the Legal Committee hearings and a public assembly in Rakvere on the topic of corruption are mentioned, indicating active engagement both in parliament and at the local level.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
Not enough data
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
The speaker is active in the plenary session, asking questions of the bill's rapporteur regarding direct democracy and participating in an intense debate on security and ethics. He requested three additional minutes to extend his remarks, which demonstrates a desire to express his views thoroughly.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The records indicate participation in the Riigikogu plenary session, during which both a procedural request for an extension of time and a substantive speech were made.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
There is too little data.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The submission of an interpellation immediately before the speech is mentioned, which points to active legislative activity and the prioritization of specific topics (population policy). Data regarding the frequency or rhythm of other appearances is missing.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The data indicates participation in the Riigikogu plenary session, where he/she addresses critical questions regarding government policy to the presenter.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speeches have been consolidated into a single day of the plenary session, focusing on the interpellation directed at the Minister of Finance. The pattern of activity is oppositional, centered on the sharp criticism of the government's policies and inconsistencies.