By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

It strongly emphasizes individual liberty and the importance of home ownership, contrasting this with state-directed collective housing. It also raises the security threat in the context of e-voting, highlighting Russia's capability to create viruses and the danger posed by the insider threat.

Not enough data.

The focus among social issues is the reliability of the justice system and the protection of the principles of the rule of law. The speaker stresses the threat to citizens' liberties and the immunity of Riigikogu members if a politicized prosecutor's office allows false accusers to ruin people. The strict and impartial application of justice is preferred.

Not enough data

Among the social issues addressed are questions of security and national integrity, requiring continuous vetting and polygraph testing for top politicians. The aim is to prevent individuals with suspicious intentions and interests from entering the government, citing the case of Mihhail Korb.

The primary social theme concerns the nation's ethical compass and moral integrity, contrasting the ethical attitudes of EKRE voters with those of Reform Party voters. The speaker asserts that the "blood business" has become morally acceptable to Reform Party voters.

There is too little data.

Key issues in the social sphere include immigration, cultural self-defense, and the dignity of women. The speaker strongly opposes face coverings and other foreign customs which, in his view, degrade women. Warnings are issued regarding the growing threat of terrorism and the emergence of a Sharia society, underscoring the necessity of protecting national culture.

The focus is on education policy and the integration of Ukrainian refugees in Estonia. The speaker strongly opposes the practice of placing temporary refugees in Russian-language schools, emphasizing the urgent need to preserve their mother tongue and culture.

It raises the issue of women's protection, supporting a ban on face coverings, following the example set by France, to prevent women from being marginalized. It also asks about the feasibility and cost of implementing gender-neutral traffic signs (citing Finland as an example).