By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets
Total Sessions: 10
Fully Profiled: 10
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is no information regarding cooperation with colleagues or other political parties. The only indication of previous collaboration is the proposal of the PPP project model during the Ratas administration, which the speaker intends to continue.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
Insufficient data.
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
No data is available regarding the willingness to cooperate; the speaker's position is purely adversarial and accusatory.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Not enough data
2025-05-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
No data available.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is calling for cooperation with other ministers (specifically concerning the prevention of alcohol and drug abuse) in order to tackle widespread social issues. Simultaneously, he/she criticizes the government's inability to engage in close international cooperation (for example, with the FBI and Louis Freeh in the investigation of money laundering).
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker’s cooperation style is conditional and ironic, offering the opposing side the opportunity to come "ask for advice" and discuss school physics, thereby hinting at the opponents' lack of knowledge. He calls for the involvement of Riigikogu terminologists to discuss the aptness of the term "accidental electricity," but he offers no substantive compromise.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The address contains no references to cooperation or a willingness to compromise; instead, it emphasizes EKRE's staunch opposition to the legislation. The speaker appeals to older generation MPs (such as Enn Eesmaa), citing a shared negative historical experience, but this functions more as a cautionary warning than an actual call for collaboration.