By Plenary Sessions: Tiit Maran

The primary criticism targets the operational procedures of the Environment Committee and the chairman/rapporteur, accusing them of disregarding the substantive consideration of proposed amendments and failing to conduct consultations. It sharply criticizes the lobbying efforts and major interests driving the decision, which could result in outcomes detrimental to the taxpayer. It takes a stand against the position that decisions must be made regardless of the circumstances, even in the absence of proper analysis.

No references were made to opponents or criticism; the speaker emphasized the consensus of the committee's internal decisions and the smooth procedure.

The criticism is aimed at the inaction of the current and future governments in developing regional and mobility policy. The opposition is policy-based, emphasizing that the car tax will remain ineffective if it only serves to fill the state treasury and not environmental goals. The speaker also criticizes the green transition, which strives for endless growth in a limited space, calling it the hope of creating a perpetual motion machine.