By Plenary Sessions: Tiit Maran
Total Sessions: 52
Fully Profiled: 52
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary criticism is leveled against the Ministry of Climate, citing a one-sided approach and a lack of internal institutional coordination. Specifically, the exclusion of experts from the climate and biodiversity departments from the drafting of the bill is being criticized. The criticism is procedural and substantive, not personal, and demands that the ministry rectify the shortcomings.
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
There is no direct opposition; the speaker is posing questions to the government (the Prime Minister) to clarify the procedures and timeline. Instead of criticism, clarification is being sought regarding the handling of environmental values, compensation areas, and the realism of the completion deadline that has been floated in the press.
2025-10-13
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the government (the Reform Party and former coalition partners) regarding the unsuccessful drafting of the climate law, the resulting delays, and a process that lacked substantive engagement. Criticism is also directed at the Estonian Employers' Confederation, which seeks to restrict nesting season protections solely to protected areas—a position that contradicts the ruling of the European Court of Justice. The criticism is primarily political and procedural in nature.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The confrontation is aimed at the party that rejected the draft bill, criticizing their justification that the price reduction reaching final consumer prices was uncertain. The criticism is intense and calls the opposing side's analytical capabilities into question, suggesting that their approach differs significantly from that of other countries and is potentially unwise.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The confrontation is aimed at a government representative (the minister), who is being criticized for the lack of clarity regarding the prisoners' profile or for presenting contradictory data. The criticism is politically motivated and centers on the accuracy of the facts, casting doubt on whether those being brought to Estonia are serving light or heavy sentences.
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
The main targets of criticism are the Government Office and the Council for Efficiency and Economic Growth, who are accused of interfering in the field of forest policy and serving commercial interests. The criticism is intense, focusing on procedural violations and ill-considered proposals that are driven by the business interests of an industry struggling with raw material shortages.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The main opponent is the government and the prime minister, both of whom are criticized for procedural shortcomings (lack of transparency, prioritizing narrow interests) and their political choices. The criticism is intense, suggesting that the composition of the council (which includes financial backers of the governing parties) "looks bad" and may be corrupt.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
The main criticism is directed at the system and officials of the Ministry of Education, who disregarded the unanimous resolution of the Culture Committee and the commitment to revisit the issue in the autumn. The criticism is procedural, accusing officials of advancing the decision-making process in a manner that rendered further debate meaningless.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
Direct opposition is not voiced, but the speaker is criticized for the shift in focus, highlighting the concern that environmental and climate issues have been relegated too far into the background this time. The criticism is aimed at the content and priorities of the policy; it is not personal.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the ministries, specifically regarding procedural errors (non-compliance with the planning act) and political priorities (the reduction of environmental education). The minister's attempt to blame the court is particularly criticized, with critics stressing that the ministry holds the responsibility for the proper formalization of decisions. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the government's energy policy, particularly its strategy for financing nuclear energy. The criticism is political, centering on the inconsistency of the government advisor's statements concerning the use of taxpayer funds. The intensity remains moderate, with the focus being on demanding clarification.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main criticism is directed at the government, the Minister of Energy and Environment, and the Council of Entrepreneurs. The criticism is intense and focuses both on political decisions (forestry, climate law) and on procedural and ethical issues (conflict of interest, exceeding authority). The speaker criticizes the Environmental Board's inability to carry out supervision and identify those responsible for causing damage.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the outcomes of the commission's debate or at those offering simplified solutions who assume that either education or the private sector can solve every problem. This opposition is policy-driven, highlighting the insufficiency of such solutions when it comes to addressing shortcomings in state capacity.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the Reform Party and the Centre Party. The Reform Party is criticized for backtracking on promises (free kindergarten places) and simplifying nature conservation, as well as for an unfair regional focus. The Centre Party is criticized for excessive self-praise, the chaotic nature of Tallinn's Green Capital period, and the lack of substantive action. In the context of labor law, the critic slams the government for using strong-arm tactics that prioritize employers over employees, while completely ignoring trade union protests.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
The main confrontation is with the government and the coalition, who are accused of permitting the desecration of holy sites and adopting a technocratic mindset. The criticism is extremely intense, labeling the actions "brutal marauding" and casting doubt on the government's comprehension of cultural values. He/She suggests that the government's inaction could even lead to the felling of trees in churchyards and cemeteries.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The opposition is aimed at those who favor lengthy, multi-stage judicial proceedings, which, in the speaker's view, impede the accountability of monopolistic interests. The criticism is procedural, challenging the opposing party's assertions regarding the law serving narrow interests and referencing their past positions on avoiding sanctions.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The criticism is aimed at the decision-makers who established the 30%/70% targets without thorough discussion, as well as those who have failed to adopt the Environmental Sector Development Plan (KEVAD). The resistance is intense and centers on procedural deficiencies, with the opposing side being accused of unexpectedly and unilaterally imposing the decisions.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
The opposition is directed at the government's policies and decision-making processes, particularly regarding the formation of councils and the draft environmental laws. The criticism focuses on procedural deficiencies (criteria for member selection and the exclusion of conflicts of interest) and the impracticality of the policy. The intensity of the attack is strong, demanding explanations as to why certain interest groups have been excluded.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The main opponents are the Ministry of Climate and the Government, who are criticized for failing to approve the strategic development plan and for the lack of transparency in drafting legislation ("behind closed doors," secretly). Criticism is particularly sharp regarding the unfair treatment of landowners and the "endless stalling" in the energy sector. The Minister is also misinformed, as he denies the sharp increase in logging in Natura areas, a claim the speaker corrects by referencing the National Audit Office.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at the failures of previous governments (specifically, ignoring the Natura assessment since 2004) and the current Ministry of Climate. He/She sharply criticizes the interests and rhetoric of the forestry industry that discredits conservation efforts, and condemns the decisions made by officials and politicians, which have eroded public trust in the state.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at the initiators of the legislative amendments, who are criticized for failing to create separate support or an alternative solution for young people. The criticism is policy-based and focuses on the government's inability to prevent young people from having to apply for subsistence benefits.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the political power games and the coalition, which allow substantive proposals to be sidelined if they originate from the opposition. The speaker notes that his proposals, which the ministry initially deemed easily implementable, suddenly became unexpectedly complicated once they were associated with the opposition, suggesting procedural obstruction. He also criticizes the inability of the judicial, executive, and legislative branches of government to grasp the significance of the living environment.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is leveled against the minister and the government, who are accused of fostering fatalism and disregarding consumer interests. The criticism is political, focusing on deficiencies in legislative amendments (competition) and regional policy (railway, rural support). The speaker also faults the minister for inconsistencies and contradictions between his earlier and later positions.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main targets of criticism are the members of the coalition and their administrative reform plans, which are considered voluntaristic and foolish. The criticism is philosophical (a failure to understand the nature of public power) and political (the Reform Party's maneuvering for the position of Environment Minister). The speaker sharply criticizes the technical reduction of the administration without delving into the substance.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker is in strong opposition to the ruling coalition, criticizing their political direction and competence on environmental issues. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of being completely oblivious to the importance of the living environment. Specifically highlighted is the proposal by a coalition partner to abolish the Environmental Board.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker relayed criticism from the Ministry of Climate and other parties regarding Draft Bill 567, which centered on undefined terminology (such as 'nuisance specimen' and 'game animal') and the insufficient implementation of preventive measures. The criticism was policy- and procedure-driven, stressing that the bill might allow people to vent their anger on large predators and that violations occur even in cases involving otherwise trustworthy citizens.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is no direct opposition, but the speaker questions previous assertions regarding the simplicity and low cost of nuclear waste storage. The criticism is aimed at inconsistencies in political claims and the policy-driven underestimation of costs.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Criticism is directed toward irresponsible dog owners, who are considered the real culprits behind dog attacks, rather than the dogs themselves. The current situation is also criticized, specifically where local municipalities have been "powerless" to prevent these incidents, pointing to shortcomings in the existing legal framework.
2025-01-29
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is directed against the rushed legislative practice, characterized by the desire to adopt the Climate Law without ensuring the soundness of its content. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, demanding comprehensive preparation to achieve the best possible outcome.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The direct political opposition is not criticized, but a systemic problem is highlighted: the inability to interpret ecological data and logic in decision-making processes, which led to the crisis that emerged at the end of last year. Forestry policy ("over-logging") is also indirectly criticized, which has increased pressure on the ungulate population and worsened the wolf's food base.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the state's general political culture and bureaucracy, which compels us to wait for external solutions (from the EU) on important environmental matters, rather than tackling the problems ourselves. Furthermore, regulations that impede the circulation of food (e.g., the zoo example) are also criticized. This criticism is policy- and procedure-based.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at members of parliament who present claims that are either unfounded or outright false, seemingly living in "two different realities." There is also strong opposition to those who doubt the anthropogenic causes of climate change and those who disregard scientific consensus, with emphasis placed on the fact that such conduct is inappropriate within the honorable chamber. The criticism is primarily focused on ensuring factual accuracy and procedural fairness.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Criticism is aimed at the economic framework presented by the Prime Minister, which is viewed as isolated and inadequate in its consideration of the social and natural environment. It also indirectly criticizes those who tell "fairy tales" about the consequences of aggression, stressing that making concessions to the aggressor increases the risks facing Estonia.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the church branch affiliated with Russia, which is being criticized for the potential use of faith as a weapon in the ongoing war. The criticism is institutional and based on security concerns, not personal or anti-religious.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The opposition is directed at the government’s administrative decision and the justifications presented by the rapporteur, which are considered insufficient and arbitrary. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on how the separation of planning functions hinders the work of the Ministry of Regional Affairs and Agriculture. There is no willingness to compromise, as the response is deemed unsatisfactory.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the substance of the draft bill and the rationale behind its creation, not at specific political opponents. The opposition is both substantive and procedural, emphasizing deficiencies in how the fungal kingdom is addressed and inconsistencies regarding the exclusion of the plant kingdom during the construction of renewable energy facilities.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at improper legislative practice concerning the introduction of conceptual changes under the guise of a simple legal amendment. Specific opponents, groups, or individuals who engage in this practice are not named.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The primary criticism targets the operational procedures of the Environment Committee and the chairman/rapporteur, accusing them of disregarding the substantive consideration of proposed amendments and failing to conduct consultations. It sharply criticizes the lobbying efforts and major interests driving the decision, which could result in outcomes detrimental to the taxpayer. It takes a stand against the position that decisions must be made regardless of the circumstances, even in the absence of proper analysis.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
No references were made to opponents or criticism; the speaker emphasized the consensus of the committee's internal decisions and the smooth procedure.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the inaction of the current and future governments in developing regional and mobility policy. The opposition is policy-based, emphasizing that the car tax will remain ineffective if it only serves to fill the state treasury and not environmental goals. The speaker also criticizes the green transition, which strives for endless growth in a limited space, calling it the hope of creating a perpetual motion machine.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the rapporteur of the decision and the government, criticizing the rushed legalization of nuclear energy and the inconsistencies found in the arguments presented. The criticism targets the substance of the policy, procedural irregularities, and economic fallacies, specifically questioning the affordability of nuclear energy.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Criticism is directed at the Minister of Climate and the government's climate strategy, particularly the narrow, economy-centric focus of the draft bill. The opposition is policy-based, emphasizing shortcomings in the implementation of environmental protection and sustainable development principles. Specifically criticized are the plans for fast-growing timber plantations and the preparation for mining phosphorite reserves.
2024-04-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at nuclear energy lobby organizations and firms that commission biased surveys, thereby creating a confusing information space. It also calls into question the presenter's previous claims regarding the manageability and economic risk-freeness of nuclear energy, demanding clarification concerning taxpayer guarantees.
2024-04-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at certain agricultural practices, calling into question the assertion that farming is always a friend to biodiversity. It highlights environmental issues such as nitrogen and phosphorus runoff into the sea and the decline of open-country birds, demanding fundamental changes to agriculture.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The oppositional stance is evident in the critical scrutiny of the government's economic plans, pointing to a potential deficiency in the assessment of environmental impact and the buffering capacity of the living environment. The criticism is directed at the content and integrity of the policy, not personal.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the procedural irregularities and the rushed nature of the bill, not the national defense objectives themselves. The opposition focused on three specific points unrelated to the urgency of Kevadtorm (Spring Storm), and this criticism was later proven justified. The criticism is directed toward the initiators of the bill or the government, who rushed the drafting process.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Direct political opposition is not voiced, but procedural criticism is being raised concerning the bill's first reading. The criticism stems from the fact that the input of local governments, which is essential for the law's implementability, was disregarded during the initial reading.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
Criticism is aimed at the rushed emergency processing of the draft bill, particularly regarding amendments to the Nature Conservation Act that are not directly related to the Kevadtorm (Spring Storm) exercise. Concern is expressed that during deliberations between the Minister of Defence and the Environmental Board, defence interests may override the interests of the living environment, pointing to potential scandals.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the inconsistencies and potential flaws within the draft legislation, not at specific opponents or political groups. The intensity is low; the goal is to obtain clarification and amend the law.
2024-02-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The opposition refers to the topic statement presented by the previous speaker, which addressed the need for separate regulation of insect protein meal due to cultural and health reasons. The criticism is directed at the insufficient evidence base and the lack of logical consistency in the opposing arguments.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is no direct opposition, but the speaker questions the accuracy and sufficiency of the claims presented by the presenter, demanding specific quantitative evidence. The criticism is directed toward the inadequacy of facts and data, rather than individuals or procedures.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
On the topic of identity, he criticizes the fundamental basis of the arguments made by proponents of removing the monument, calling into question the assertion that removal is a prerequisite for identity to be taken seriously. Regarding environmental issues, the current system is indirectly criticized—a system where used water is disposed of while the economy continues to utilize clean resources.