By Plenary Sessions: Tiit Maran

It demonstrates a profound awareness of the risks and history within the energy sector, referencing specific past failures (the Eesti Energia scandals in Utah and Jordan, the privatization of NRG). It employs technical terminology such as "conditionality" and "National Energy Development Plan," emphasizing that the nuclear working group's report failed to address the compatibility of the economic and energy system. It openly questions the claims regarding nuclear energy being the most affordable option, citing OTRK presentations.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the procedural rules of the Riigikogu and the work processes of the Environment Committee, providing a precise overview of the formalities involved in appointing and recalling council members. He uses specific terminology (the leading committee, the draft bill, a consensus decision) and presents a detailed breakdown of the agenda items for the committee meeting.

The speaker demonstrates a deep knowledge of ecology and environmental sciences, utilizing complex concepts such as the biosphere, biodiversity, and the historical accumulation of fossil energy. He supports his arguments with historical and scientific analogies, explaining energy density and the impact of "the Great Acceleration" on civilization. He uses a scientific framework to criticize economic models based on endless growth.