By Plenary Sessions: Tiit Maran

Strong opposition to the current form of the decision regarding preparations for the introduction of nuclear energy, emphasizing that the decision is rushed and deficient, as it lacks the necessary danger and risk assessments, as well as an analysis of economic and security suitability. The political framework is clearly procedural and value-based, requiring thorough deliberation and responsibility toward future generations. The core position is that the decision should not be made until sufficient information is available and risks have been mitigated, which is why a proposal is being made to interrupt the reading.

The political focus centers on the transmission of procedural decisions made by the Riigikogu Environment Committee regarding the appointment and recall of council members for nationally significant foundations and centers (RMK, KIK). He/She strongly supports the consensus proposals put forth by the committee for the nomination of Social Democratic Party candidates (Anti Allas, Eduard Odinets). This stance is primarily procedural and results-oriented, emphasizing a smooth succession (for example, following the departure of Jevgeni Ossinovski).

The most prominent topic is the car tax, which the speaker addresses primarily within the framework of an environmental tax. They oppose the tax hike as a measure for filling the state coffers, but support its necessity if it helps shift behavioral patterns toward sustainability. The political stance is strongly value-based, focusing on the environmental crisis and long-term sustainability. The speaker emphasized that they were speaking on their own behalf, not on behalf of the faction.