By Plenary Sessions: Mart Maastik

The opposition is primarily aimed at the governing coalition (Eesti 200, Reform Party) for failing to deliver on promises and for legislative stalling on the issue of voting rights. The criticism focuses on the procedural slowness, demanding quicker action. Reference is also made to earlier resistance from the Social Democrats (Indrek Saar), who considered the matter a red line.

The main opposition is directed at the government and the minister, whose policy is being criticized for its inconsistency in achieving health objectives. The criticism is purely political and substantive, focusing on the negative impact of cutting subsidies.

The primary criticism targets the actions of the justice system and investigative authorities, citing procedural inequality and an unjust approach. The criticism is intense and hinges on the comparison of specific cases (Mölder's aggressive search versus Lehtme's immunity), demanding accountability and explanations from the ministry.

The primary adversary is colleague Pillak, whose stance on prioritizing external peace is fiercely criticized. The criticism is intense and rooted in core values, challenging the tenability of the opponent's priorities in the context of the nation's survival.

The main criticism is aimed at Minister of Justice Kalle Laanet, whose actions concerning the Prosecutor General are viewed as problematic and amounting to interference. The criticism is intense, focusing on the minister’s alleged attempt to force Parma to resign and the vague concept of "political credit of trust." The selective and ineffective work of the Prosecutor's Office is also being criticized.

The primary opponents are the government and the prime minister, who are sharply criticized for the lack of strategic direction regarding the preservation of the nation. Criticism is also directed at the Auditor General concerning budget discipline and the funding of supplementary projects, emphasizing that the state's purse is finite.

The main targets of criticism are the government’s political decisions and procedures (specifically, board appointments/selections) as well as concrete failed green projects. Keit Pentus-Rosimannus is directly named in connection with the 300 million euro biofuel project, highlighting the policy failure and resulting waste. The criticism is intense and focuses heavily on policy and procedural issues.

The main criticism is directed at the government and the prime minister, who are accused of presenting false facts and enriching bankers who are Swedish owners. The criticism is intense and politically motivated, opposing the government’s plans (e.g., the car tax) and demanding sensible action. A compromise involving the solutions offered by the government (such as paying taxes earlier) is ruled out because it would not generate additional revenue for the state.