By Plenary Sessions: Mart Maastik
Total Sessions: 134
Fully Profiled: 134
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The main opponent is the government and the Ministry of Climate (under the leadership of Andres Sutt), who are being criticized for financial inefficiency and market distortions. The criticism is based on policy and procedure, highlighting the waste of taxpayer money. The speaker vehemently rejects the prime minister's attempts to evade the issue, accusing him/her of diverting the conversation and leveling political accusations (references to EKREIKE).
2025-10-14
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary criticism targets the government and the minister, specifically faulting the procedural inefficiency and political bias involved in processing the draft legislation. The speaker suggests that the political parties currently in power are not interested in strengthening oversight because it concerns their supporters (platform service providers), which is why straightforward solutions are delayed for years.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The standoff is aimed at the government and ministers, criticizing their budget management, tax policy, and the administration of the healthcare system. The criticism is intense and focuses on the timing of fulfilling political promises at a time when national finances are running a deficit.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The primary confrontation is aimed at the government, especially the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister, who are being criticized for the budget deficit and controversial policies. The criticism is intense, focusing on policy failures and the government's broken promises (regarding cuts and wages).
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary confrontation is directed at the government and the Minister of Finance, who are criticized for the irresponsibility of the budget and the inconsistency of the tax policy. The criticism is intense and includes both a political substantive issue (the deficit) and a personal attack concerning the minister's alleged coerced actions and inadequate public demeanor.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary opposition is directed at the minister and the government, who are being criticized for introducing the car tax, which is deemed unfair and ineffective. The criticism is politically motivated, accusing the government of seeking ways to boost their approval ratings instead of tackling genuine issues. Rather than showing a willingness to compromise, critics are demanding the complete abolition of the tax.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The primary criticism is aimed at the European Union’s ill-conceived funding decisions and previous Estonian governments and members of the Riigikogu who failed to sufficiently analyze the project’s feasibility. The criticism is intense and focuses on political indecisiveness and procedural errors, particularly the failure to push back against "rather foolish directives." Also under fire is the country’s lack of funds, which necessitates using CO2 money for the construction of Rail Baltic.
2025-09-23
15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session
Opposition is aimed at the bill's proponents, whose claims regarding the lack of bureaucracy and free collection are deemed unrealistic. The criticism is policy-driven, demanding greater financial transparency and proper cost accounting, particularly concerning the burden placed on the consumer.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
The confrontation is aimed directly at the prime minister and the government, who stand accused of causing political chaos, engaging in obfuscation, and creating uncertainty. The criticism is intense and addresses both specific policy decisions (the car tax, family benefits) and the government's overall trustworthiness, with critics claiming that the government's actions undermine the credibility of the entire country. The opponents are also accused of failing to heed earlier warnings.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The criticism is directed at the security deficiencies of the e-voting system and regulatory shortcomings. The resistance is procedural and political, calling for the system to be made safer, but direct opponents are not criticized personally.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The main adversary is the minister, who is sharply criticized for decisions made while serving as the head of the Health Insurance Fund council. The criticism is performance-based and procedural, accusing the minister of financial irresponsibility and "wasteful spending" at a time when the Health Insurance Fund's situation is catastrophic. The attacks are intense and focus on personal accountability for the inappropriate use of public funds.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The speaker is taking an opposition stance toward the government or the responsible minister, sharply criticizing the priorities set for the defense and border strategy. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, focusing on security shortcomings and ineffective solutions (such as digging ditches).
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The criticism is directed straight at the Government of the Republic and the coalition parties (the Reform Party, Estonia 200), accusing them of breaking election promises and pursuing foolish policies (the car tax). The criticism is primarily policy-based (tax hikes, weakening energy security) and procedural (failure to receive answers, wasting time), demanding the withdrawal of the draft legislation and a proper debate.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The primary opposition is aimed at the ruling coalition, particularly the largest party and the Social Democrats (Socs). The criticism is policy-based (taxes, subsidies) and procedural, accusing the governing parties of avoiding responsibility and being controlled by their smaller partners. The attacks are intense and cast doubt on the government's independence.
2025-06-16
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
The opposition is primarily directed at the excessive bureaucracy stemming from the European Union's "vast machinery." Furthermore, the critic takes issue with the government's/minister's claims regarding the cost-effectiveness and logistics of waste management, deeming the proposed solutions unrealistic and unfeasible. The criticism is aimed at political inefficiency, not at specific individuals.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary targets are the coalition parties (SDE, Reformierakond, Eesti 200), who face accusations of hypocrisy, particularly concerning the removal of social benefits and the introduction of new taxes. The criticism is intense and policy-based, alleging that they have increased the state's administrative costs and driven the economy toward a crash. Any compromise on the government's proposed budget and green policies is ruled out, with a proposal being made to reject the draft legislation entirely.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
The confrontation is directed at the government (the prime minister), criticizing the ambiguous legal and financial consequences of the international agreement. The criticism is policy-driven, demanding a precise definition of who bears the responsibility and costs should the prisoner commit a new crime in Estonia.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
No direct confrontation with political parties or individuals is expressed; criticism is instead aimed at the shortcomings of the existing legal framework and the uncontrolled activities of rental companies, which are disrupting pedestrians. The speaker acknowledges the existence of a free market economy but stresses the need for regulation to prevent chaos.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the policies of the minister and the government, which are deemed unclear, underfunded, and economically unsound (e.g., the segregated waste collection project). The opposition is based on policy and procedure, focusing on inefficiency and the economic unjustifiability of the mandatory clauses.
2025-06-02
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The primary conflict is with the government, which is facing criticism over the supplementary budget's poor fiscal management and the lack of clarity regarding proposed savings. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, demanding an explanation from the government as to why labor costs are actually increasing.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The primary targets of criticism are the ruling coalition (accused of appropriating ideas and envy) and the European Union, whose regulations are deemed excessive and detrimental to the economy. The criticism is intense, focusing on the fundamental policy deficiencies, particularly regarding bureaucracy and the destruction of competitiveness.
2025-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary opponent is the minister and the government, whose education policy is being criticized as unrealistic and destructive. The criticism is policy-driven, emphasizing that the minister's intentions (preserving schools) contradict the actual consequences (decline, and the loss of jobs and students). The opposition is intense, pointing to the absurdity of the policy (creating new positions for ten people for 40 graduates).
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The main opponents are the coalition parties and the Social Democrats, who are accused of making foolish and socialist decisions. Criticism is directed at specific politicians (Mario Kadastik, Hanah Lahe, Kristina Kallas) and their ideological stances (climate hysteria, gender quotas, Western absurdities). The opponents’ policies are considered destructive to the competitiveness of the Estonian economy.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, fifth sitting, information briefing.
The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the Minister of Education, who are being accused of engaging in displacement activity and creating needless bureaucracy. The opposition is intense and centers on the negative practical consequences of the policy (the regulation), particularly for rural areas. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the government, the prime minister, and the climate minister, who are criticized for their senseless energy policy and for breaking the promise of tax stability. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of over-delivering on unrealistic EU aspirations and citing Elering’s unreasonable expenditures. The speaker also opposes the ideology of the green transition, which, in his view, has driven competitive oil shale energy out of existence.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
Criticism is aimed at the service operator TS Laevad, who is accused of maximizing profit at the expense of service quality, and also at the government/ministry. Specific criticism targets procedural failure (the construction of a ramp during peak season) and political incompetence (the delay in procuring a fifth vessel due to utopian environmental requirements). Furthermore, they are criticized for failing to consult with local governments when raising ticket prices.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main adversary is the minister, who is being criticized for defending bureaucracy and for inefficient leadership. The criticism is intense and includes personal attacks, suggesting that the minister views members of the Riigikogu (Parliament) as "sheep" and the agency itself as the true governing power. No willingness to compromise has been expressed.
2025-04-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponents are the government led by the Reform Party and the Social Democrats (Sotsid), who are accused of imposing ideological and excessively expensive energy decisions. The criticism is predominantly policy- and procedure-based, highlighting the lack of impact assessments and unrealistic goals that will lead to an economic collapse. He/She also criticizes the influence of lobby groups on political decisions, deeming the coalition's actions "chaotic."
2025-04-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main targets are the government, and specifically the Prime Minister and Minister Andres Sutt, who are being criticized for unclear and constantly shifting decisions. The criticism is fierce, focusing on the government’s incompetence in energy planning and the market distortion caused by subsidization. The speaker suggests that decisions are being made "based on someone's ideology or for the personal gain of certain lobby groups," and warns that the current policy "is killing our economy."
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the system that allows a private enterprise (the banking sector) to generate extraordinary profits at the expense of the central bank's inflation control measures. The speaker questions the legitimacy of money flowing into the pockets of a specific business entity for the purpose of curbing inflation. The objection is rooted in policy and mechanism.
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The main target is the Prime Minister and the government, who are being criticized for providing vague answers and making unreasonable political decisions. Criticism is also aimed at the alleged stance of the management of the state-owned company (Elering)—that energy decisions should not be made based on Estonian interests. The criticism is based on policy and procedure.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary opponents are the European Union (for creating absurd directives) and Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi, who is criticized for dodging substantive issues. The resistance is intense, demanding that the Estonian state show the courage to push back against the European Union's requirements and stop adopting everything merely out of fear of fines. Ligi is also criticized for his past conduct toward colleagues.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The criticism is leveled directly at the prime minister and the government, addressing both administrative decisions (such as changing ministry names and creating confusion) and procedural opacity (unanswered questions). The attacks focus on the government's inefficiency and costly tactics.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The main opposition is directed against Mario Kadastik, a member of the Economic Affairs Committee, and the energy policy of the previous government (the Social Democrats), accusing them of changing their positions and causing market distortion. The criticism is sharp and policy-based, claiming that the subsidization is ideological and beneficial to certain entrepreneurs engaged in lobbying. Opponents are accused of hypocrisy in connection with climate goals and the CO2 emissions generated on the battlefield.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
The main opponent is the government led by the Prime Minister and its fiscal policy, which is suspected of secretly inflating expenditures. The criticism focuses on the policy's inefficiency and the procedures that, instead of delivering the promised cuts, actually increase bureaucracy and costs. The speaker is demanding a specific and substantive response from the government, making it clear that the issue is not the possibility of compromise, but rather the government's integrity.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the Reform Party, who is sharply criticized for their core political tenet of shifting blame onto others. Criticism is also aimed at the Sotsid (Social Democrats) and EKREIKE as former accomplices, and at Eesti 200 as a future potential culprit, should things go wrong.
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary backlash is aimed at the government and politicians who, following their failures, are attempting to cover their tracks and are refusing to establish an investigative commission. The criticism is intense and focuses specifically on procedural failures (avoiding accountability) and political failures (wasting taxpayer money). Opponents are being accused of committing blunders and concealing criminal decisions.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
The main opponent is the Prime Minister and the government, whose energy policy is sharply criticized for being ideological, wasteful, and inefficient. The criticism is policy-based, focusing directly on the figures presented by the government and the cost of the proposed solutions, and is intense, accusing the government of favoring irrational and security-threatening solutions. There is no sign of willingness to compromise; instead, a revision of the existing plans is demanded.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at politicians who vote against their own convictions or support voting rights for non-citizens, thereby calling into question their courage and priorities. The criticism is policy- and value-based, accusing the opposing side of failing to be masters in their own land and instead talking about the oppressed "citizens of aggressor states."
2025-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.
The main opponents are the government coalition as a whole, especially the Reform Party (for changing sports funding) and Eesti 200 (for setting priorities, citing Minister Kallas's trip as an example). The criticism is directed at political decisions (cuts, taxes) and procedural issues (the timing of the debate, the minister's actions during the strike). The speaker demands that the government justify its decisions, which points to the intensity of the uncompromising criticism.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is no direct opposition or criticism aimed at political opponents. Questions are directed at the Minister of Defense to clarify the specifics and cost of the government’s plans, which indicates the execution of an oversight function rather than direct confrontation.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th sitting, information briefing
The main adversaries are the Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance, who are criticized for political decisions (subsidizing expensive offshore wind parks) and for creating unequal competition. The criticism is intense and accusatory, particularly concerning the lack of justification for tax hikes and national defense funding. The speaker faults the ministers for evading questions and presenting inaccurate data.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The primary opposition is directed against the policies and assertions of the government (the minister), particularly regarding the funding of the education pact and the viability of wind energy. The Isamaa party is being defended against the minister's accusations, with emphasis placed on the fact that the agreement was not confirmed due to inadequate financial guarantees from the state. The criticism targets the substance and procedures of the policy, rather than individuals.
2025-02-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary meeting
Fierce resistance is directed at those who made energy policy decisions in secret, without providing calculations or justification. The criticism is intense, focusing on procedural failure and the use of subsidies, which has been branded as "very wrong policy."
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary confrontation is aimed at the Prime Minister and the government’s energy policy. The criticism is political and economic in nature, centering on the unnecessary planning of expensive, subsidized projects (offshore wind, nuclear power plants), given the existing onshore potential. The intensity of the opposition is strong because the government's claims regarding cheap energy are being directly challenged.
2025-02-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is directed at the European Union's leadership and their energy policy, which is unsustainable and pursues mystical climate goals. The critique is policy-based, emphasizing its economic damage and self-destructive nature, which is leading Europe toward collapse.
2025-02-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The confrontation is aimed directly at the prime minister and the government, calling into question the data they presented (26% income tax) and the results of their economic policy (economic recession). The criticism is policy- and data-driven, demanding explanations regarding the specifics of the tax system.
2025-01-29
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism targets policymakers who set unrealistic goals (e.g., 90% climate neutrality by 2040) and pass foolish decisions. The speaker sharply criticizes the powers granted to the European Union, which have led to the effective loss of Estonian independence, and accuses them of creating charges that generate unhealthy competition.
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The confrontation is aimed directly at the current government coalition, which is accused of creating ideology-based curricula and engaging in "absurdity." Criticism is also directed at the minister's stance regarding teacher freedom of choice and the funding of "pseudo-scientists" based on a political mandate. The opposition is intense and ideological.
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The main opposition is aimed at the coalition and the rapporteur who introduced and are defending the car tax. The criticism is intense and accusatory, claiming that the tax is deliberately unfair and was implemented with the goal of fleecing the public. The opposition is both substantive (concerning the policy itself) and procedural (lack of transparency in the calculations).
2025-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The main opponents are the government and the prime minister, who are fiercely criticized for their lack of political accountability and economically unsound decisions. The criticism is intense and ranges from the substance of the policy (supporting Nordica) to questioning their personal competence, asking whether it was a conscious decision or sheer stupidity.
2025-01-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the government, specifically regarding their defense spending and tax policy. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the contradiction between the tax burden collected from the populace and the actual achievement of defense objectives. The intensity of the attack is high, as people are directly asking why such a large additional burden was placed on the public when the money is not actually being spent to the necessary extent.
2025-01-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main confrontation is directed against the government, which is criticized for its unstable and unstatesmanlike family policy (the granting and withdrawal of benefits). Criticism is also aimed at the political parties that oppose child benefits, demanding that they propose alternative solutions. The opposition is policy- and value-based, accusing opponents of undermining the public sense of security.
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Direct opposition to the draft bill is not expressed, but the speaker questions the scope and justification of the bill, criticizing the committee/rapporteur for an insufficient systemic approach. The criticism focuses on the fact that Riigikogu members are being treated as an exception, while the control mechanisms for other state officials remain unclear.
2024-12-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition is directed against the government's tax policy, urgently demanding a "tax moratorium" and criticizing the raising of taxes. Criticism is also leveled at the general conduct of politicians, specifically their use of expense reimbursements and their lack of common sense.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary opposition is aimed directly at the actions of the minister and the government, criticizing the chaotic nature of the planning, the lack of oversight, and the rushing (all for the sake of a 60-day win). The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of causing major problems and burdening the populace with high taxes.
2024-12-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The main opposition is the government, which faces criticism for wasteful spending and ill-advised administrative decisions, especially regarding the hiring of special representatives. The criticism is strong, focusing on the political contradiction between promises of austerity and the creation of new, expensive posts. The attacks are policy- and procedure-based.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the ministry and Finance Minister Ligi, who is accused of having a stubborn attitude toward entrepreneurs and ignoring their proposals. The criticism is intense and focuses on the political inability to support entrepreneurs during a difficult time. Opposition is also directed at the Economic Committee, which "tucked its tail between its legs" and failed to stand up for the interests of entrepreneurs.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the management and wage policies of state-owned companies, highlighting the failures and lack of accountability at Nordica and Eesti Energia. The government's economic policy, which has driven the economy into the ground, is also under fire. The Centre Party is indirectly criticized for their salary proposal, with calls for them to lead by example.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary opposition is directed at the Ministry of Finance and personally Jürgen Ligi, who is accused of ignoring proposals from entrepreneurs and the Chamber of Auditors and forcing through over-regulation. The criticism is intense and political, raising questions about whose interests the Riigikogu (Parliament) is protecting—the minister's or the business community's.
2024-12-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth session, press briefing.
The opposition is aimed at the government and its leaders, specifically naming Prime Minister Michal and the Chancellor of the Ministry of Climate. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the failure of tax policy and the inability to keep Estonia competitive. The intensity of the attack is high, suggesting the government's ignorance and inaction.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary criticism targets the poor quality of legislation and the low work ethic of other members of parliament, based on the assumption that deputies may not be performing their duties. The criticism is intense and procedural, proposing extreme measures such as assessing the competence of deputies, issuing official mandates, and expulsion from parliament for absences.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The main confrontation is directed against the Reform Party and the government, criticizing their attempts to reduce social benefits while attributing the increase in social benefits to the Isamaa Party. Criticism is also leveled at the government’s political indecision regarding the issue of phosphorite surveys and the lack of clarity concerning the foundations of its foreign policy. The criticism is primarily policy- and value-based.
2024-12-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The primary opponent is the government and the prime minister, who are sharply criticized both for political decisions (offshore wind farms) and procedural deficiencies (lack of communication with the leadership of the Defense Forces). The intensity of the attack is high, fueled by suspicion of the government’s hidden motives and favoritism toward business circles who are guaranteed income. The criticism is also aimed at the government’s inability to learn from past mistakes (e.g., the ammunition procurement).
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker positions themselves as a representative of the opposition, yet refutes the idea that the questions are simply "opposition gamesmanship," stressing instead that they stem from genuine, substantive concern. The critique targets a political deficit in data accessibility—a deficit that is procedural and material, not personal.
2024-12-02
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The primary adversary is the government, which is being criticized for actively interfering with businesses and for ignoring the concerns of both the opposition and entrepreneurs. The criticism is aimed at specific political decisions (offshore wind farms, tax increases) and the rejection of the government's narrative regarding the causes of the economic recession. The government's actions are described as "the opposite" of what should be done, and its policies are resulting in the taxpayer's "debt servitude."
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The primary opposition is aimed at scientists and presenters who stress the anthropogenic nature of climate change, as well as the CO2 quota system. The criticism is intense and politically driven, accusing opponents of economic destruction and hypocrisy. A professor who focused too heavily on "scaremongering" is especially criticized, and it is alleged that the opponents do not grasp the subject matter (they don't know the CO2 concentration).
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is directed against the coalition and the government, accusing them of political horse-trading, arbitrarily shuffling agencies around to suit partisan interests, and squandering money (e.g., 2 million for renaming a ministry). Separately, the Social Democrats and the Centre Party are criticized for vote-grubbing and making questionable personnel selections (such as abolishing the legal education requirement for the State Secretary).
2024-11-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session.
The primary opposition is directed at the amendment proposals submitted by the Ministry of Regional Affairs and Agriculture, which have been "grafted" onto the draft bill, as well as the Prime Minister's promises regarding the shortening of procedures. The criticism is policy- and procedure-focused, emphasizing the undermining of citizens' rights.
2024-11-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session
The primary confrontation is aimed at the government led by the Prime Minister and the Reform Party, criticizing both their economic policy and procedural missteps. The criticism is intense, specifically accusing the government of failing to involve business owners and lacking any clear mandate for the tax hikes. The government's actions are being labeled cynical and utterly shameless.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The main criticism is aimed at the government and the coalition, accusing them of incompetent leadership, short-sighted tax policy, and the confusing implementation of activity-based budgeting. The criticism is intense, focusing heavily on both policy and procedure, and accuses the government of destroying the Estonian economy with a "tax festival." Specifically criticized are the claims made by Maris Lauri and the Prime Minister's promises of a "pink future."
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The criticism is aimed at the procedural ambiguity surrounding the conduct of the session, rather than at a specific political opponent. It is stressed that the registration of questions ("nimble fingers") may not comply with the rules, and this is directed against the actions of the presiding officer.
2024-11-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the government, particularly the Reform Party, which is accused of reshuffling administrative areas based on partisan interests. The opposition is intense, accusing the government of pursuing hidden political agendas (such as preparing for phosphorite mining) by placing the Geological Survey under the Ministry of Climate. The criticism is primarily policy-based and procedural (concerning costs and illogicality).
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The criticism targets the current tax policy, which is viewed as overly burdensome and forces people to hold multiple jobs. In the socio-political debate, he/she challenges the stance of "Good Varro" regarding the elimination of state funding for abortions, arguing that this simplifies the issue at the expense of exceptional cases.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker defends the role of the opposition and its right to ask questions that demand answers. The primary opponent is the rapporteur, who is criticized for accusing the opposition and for violating procedural rules within the committee. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural deficiencies.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is the prime minister and the government's policy, which is sharply criticized for promoting unnecessary and costly offshore wind farms. The criticism is policy- and value-based, focusing on economic risks (high prices) and security risks.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The primary opposition is directed at the government and the prime minister, who are being criticized for setting misplaced priorities, specifically prioritizing climate goals over economic growth. The criticism is both political and performance-based, accusing the government of killing off rural areas and failing to deliver on promises to cut red tape. The government is also accused of the Stakhanovite over-fulfillment of European Union directives.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Criticism is aimed at the government's centralizing policies and austerity measures, which are deemed a "very short-sighted decision." Although the speaker begins mildly, stating that they do not believe the minister has bad intentions, they are intensely critical of the policy's failure to consider the regional dimension. There is also opposition to the fiscal policy, which plans tax hikes despite previous negative experience.
2024-10-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The main opposition came from the Legal Affairs Committee, where the draft bill was rejected on the grounds that a precedent should not be set or the law changed for the sake of individual cases. The speaker criticizes this procedural objection, stressing that the rights of every individual are important and that this is not about setting a precedent, but rather about granting an opportunity to all persons in a similar situation.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Criticism is directed at the drafters of the bill, highlighting ambiguous wording and the absence of a long-term strategy regarding temporary derogations. The objection is both procedural and substantive, focusing on the lack of logic within the draft and the absence of future plans.
2024-10-16
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, press briefing
The criticism is directed at the ministry and the government over plans to raise ticket prices and allowing the carrier to generate profit, actions that will worsen the economic situation of island residents. The opposition is based on both policy and results, emphasizing that the state should guarantee the affordability of this vital service.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The primary adversary is the minister and the government, whose policies are being slammed as economically damaging and illogical. The criticism is policy-based, disputing the positive effects of the tax increases and rejecting the assertion that the economic downturn is caused solely by 'Putin’s taxes.'
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opposition is directed at the policies of the government and the minister, which are being criticized for creating an unstable tax system and making life difficult for families (e.g., revoking health insurance and introducing the car tax). The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of jeopardizing the country’s sustainability and lacking proper leadership.
2024-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
The main confrontation is directed at the government led by the prime minister, which is being criticized for creating ministries that are costly and driven by partisan interests. The criticism is intense and focuses on the lack of political accountability and unreasonable experimentation within the administrative system. The opposition is both procedural and financial.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The primary resistance is directed at the bill's proponents and the government's policy, which is accused of short-sightedness and serving vested interests (sponsors). Foreign companies are also criticized—referred to as "some company from another country"—for building expensive parks whose profits are ultimately paid for by Estonian taxpayers. The attacks are policy- and procedure-based, especially concerning the acceleration of environmental impact assessments.
2024-09-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, press briefing
The primary opposition is focused on the tax policies of the prime minister and the government, criticizing political decisions (specifically, the abolition of the tax hump) for undermining economic competitiveness. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of ignoring the situation and "burying its head in the sand."
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The speaker is clearly taking an oppositional stance, challenging the border settlement mentioned by the government (or the minister). The criticism is rooted in both policy and substance, demanding detailed clarification and transparency regarding the government’s plans.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main criticism is aimed at the governing coalition and the government, who are accused of implementing "piles of taxes" and repeating the mistakes made during the economic crisis. Specifically, the Reform Party is criticized for obstinately insisting on abolishing the tax hump during a difficult period. The criticism is intense, policy- and procedure-based, focusing on ill-conceived decisions and the destruction of competitiveness.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The main opponent is the Reform Party and its prime ministerial candidate, who is being criticized for their policies and motives. The criticism is intense, accusing them of concealing the real reasons behind the tax hikes and funding expensive election promises.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The primary criticism is aimed at the Reform Party's policies, particularly regarding the tax hump issue and the fulfillment of election promises. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the law's negative impact on lower-income individuals. The opposition is intense, demanding the complete repeal of the law.
2024-06-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, additional plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The main criticism is aimed at the governing coalition, particularly the Reform Party, focusing on political decisions (tax increases, overpriced projects) and procedural violations. The coalition is accused of "forcing through" changes in the committee and being under the influence of lobby groups (such as Fermi Energia). Furthermore, the critique highlights the lack of accountability for previous failed state investments (Auvere, Jordanian oil shale).
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The main confrontation is directed at the government, which is being criticized for ignoring the will of the people regarding the car tax issue. The criticism is intense and focuses both on the specific policy and the broader democratic procedure, suggesting a "crisis of democracy in Estonia." Furthermore, the views of the presenter concerning the definitions of diplomacy and democracy are also indirectly criticized.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the government coalition, especially the Reform Party and Annely Akkermann, the Chair of the Finance Committee. The criticism is intense and policy-based, accusing the opponents of pushing through a harmful bill and deepening the economic recession. The speaker criticizes the Reform Party’s election promise as a pointless source of expenditure, arguing that its cancellation would solve the country’s financial woes.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main confrontation is aimed at the governing coalition, especially the Social Democrats, who are accused of exacerbating social inequality. The criticism is both political (raising taxes, eliminating tax benefits) and ethical, citing a lack of leadership in implementing cutbacks and using state funds for visits to private clubs.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
They strongly oppose the government's fiscal and energy policies, accusing the state of hiking all taxes and driving local municipalities into a difficult position. They also indirectly criticize the coalition partner's predecessor concerning the development of the "Robin Hood law." This political confrontation is further evidenced by the adjustment of Anti Allas's (left wing) political stance.
2024-05-29
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, information briefing
The main opposition is directed at the Reform Party and the ruling coalition, criticizing their hypocrisy in linking the European elections with domestic issues. The criticism is procedural (the postponement of decisions) and political (the rejection of the car tax and the failure to heed proposals).
2024-05-28
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary session
The main opponent is the government and the Riigikogu coalition, who are being criticized for their ineffective energy policy and the selective reduction of bureaucracy. The criticism is procedural (why is the Environmental Impact Assessment for only offshore wind farms being fast-tracked?) and political (unclear objectives and a lack of understanding). The opposition is intense because the government’s actions are considered potentially detrimental to health and dishonest.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the actions of the Ministry of Climate and the government, who are pushing through draft legislation and expensive infrastructure projects. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, accusing the opposing side of ignoring environmental impacts and rushing the process under the guise of reducing bureaucracy. Separately, the high cost of the Ministry of Climate’s name change (2 million euros) is also being criticized.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing
The opposition is directed at the government and the Land Board, sharply criticizing the failure of administrative procedures and the lack of communication (the ignoring of emails and calls). The criticism is intense, demanding accountability and state compensation for damages incurred by the businesses.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary opponents are the Social Democrats (Lauri Läänemets) and the Culture Committee, who are being criticized for failing to support the voting rights bill. The criticism is intense, accusing Läänemets of using security arguments (referencing KAPO, the Estonian Internal Security Service) as a political smokescreen. The opponents' motives are being questioned, and they are being attacked on procedural grounds.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The main confrontation is directed at the minister and the Social Democrats, who are accused of jeopardizing Estonian security for the sake of securing votes. The criticism is both political and personal, casting doubt on the minister's claims regarding attacks ordered by Russian special services. The intensity of the attacks is high, suggesting that compromise is ruled out on security issues.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The primary targets of criticism are the banking sector, which is deriving windfall profits from regulation, and government policy that is increasing bureaucracy (the so-called informers' law). Additionally, he sharply criticized the session chair and the head of the legal committee for procedural errors and inefficiency, citing their failure to ensure that questions were answered substantively.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the bill's rapporteur and the government's attempt to fast-track the adoption of m-voting, despite unresolved issues and expert opposition. The criticism is both substantive and procedural, accusing the opposing party of ignoring security concerns and creating illusions. The politician casts doubt on the security of e-voting, referencing negative examples from Russia and Venezuela.
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the Economic Affairs Committee and the bill’s supporters, who are accused of short-sightedness and the cavalier rejection of Isamaa’s reasonable proposals. The opposition is policy- and procedure-focused, emphasizing inadequate crisis preparedness and the disregard for consumer protection. Specifically, the lack of answers to questions raised within the committee is heavily criticized.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at the government's plan to terminate the universal service without providing an alternative, as well as the Economic Affairs Committee's decision to reject the proposals put forward by Isamaa. Criticism is also aimed at changes to the legal system that could potentially turn the administrative court into a "rubber stamp" for the Competition Authority, leaving private legal entities unprotected against the arbitrary actions of state power. Strong moral condemnation is aimed at business activities that support Russia's waging of war.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The main opponents are government ministers (the Prime Minister and other Ministers) and the Ministry of the Interior, whose political rationale and decisions are being challenged. The criticism targets both the political substance (specifically, the issue of the low-wage top specialist) and procedural flaws (the concealment or unavailability of the security analysis). The intensity of the opposition is moderate, manifesting in specific demands and expressions of doubt.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary conflict is aimed at the government and its fiscal policy, which critics argue is damaging the economy and forcing citizens into taking out payday loans. The criticism is intense and focused on policy, specifically calling into question the rationale behind establishing a national credit register if it is going to compete with private businesses.
2024-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the minister (Signe) and the direction of the government's family policy. The criticism is intense and ranges from political failure (not raising the birth rate) to personal accusations (disparaging families with many children). There is strong opposition to the role models promoted by the government, especially concerning same-sex marriage equality.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary opponent is Valdo Randpere and the commission he represents, who are being criticized for resisting the strengthening of state supervision. The critique is aimed both at the political duress (party pressure) and the substantive opposition to increasing efficiency. Personal sarcasm is being employed to undercut the opponent's position.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The opposition is rooted in doubts about whether the government has conducted sufficient preparatory work and engaged the relevant stakeholders. The criticism is procedural, focusing on the lack of information or the failure to consult, rather than being personal.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the governing coalition, especially Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the ministers who advocate for immigration (Signe Riisalo, Tiit Riisalo). The criticism is intense and centers on political missteps (cuts to family benefits) and procedural incompetence (the lack of budgetary resources for immigrant integration, a state of complete disarray). The government’s actions are described as putting the country on an "extinction course."
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
The opposition is primarily aimed at the governing coalition (Eesti 200, Reform Party) for failing to deliver on promises and for legislative stalling on the issue of voting rights. The criticism focuses on the procedural slowness, demanding quicker action. Reference is also made to earlier resistance from the Social Democrats (Indrek Saar), who considered the matter a red line.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main opposition is directed at the government and the minister, whose policy is being criticized for its inconsistency in achieving health objectives. The criticism is purely political and substantive, focusing on the negative impact of cutting subsidies.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary criticism targets the actions of the justice system and investigative authorities, citing procedural inequality and an unjust approach. The criticism is intense and hinges on the comparison of specific cases (Mölder's aggressive search versus Lehtme's immunity), demanding accountability and explanations from the ministry.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The primary adversary is colleague Pillak, whose stance on prioritizing external peace is fiercely criticized. The criticism is intense and rooted in core values, challenging the tenability of the opponent's priorities in the context of the nation's survival.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The main criticism is aimed at Minister of Justice Kalle Laanet, whose actions concerning the Prosecutor General are viewed as problematic and amounting to interference. The criticism is intense, focusing on the minister’s alleged attempt to force Parma to resign and the vague concept of "political credit of trust." The selective and ineffective work of the Prosecutor's Office is also being criticized.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary opponents are the government and the prime minister, who are sharply criticized for the lack of strategic direction regarding the preservation of the nation. Criticism is also directed at the Auditor General concerning budget discipline and the funding of supplementary projects, emphasizing that the state's purse is finite.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main targets of criticism are the government’s political decisions and procedures (specifically, board appointments/selections) as well as concrete failed green projects. Keit Pentus-Rosimannus is directly named in connection with the 300 million euro biofuel project, highlighting the policy failure and resulting waste. The criticism is intense and focuses heavily on policy and procedural issues.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is directed at the government and the prime minister, who are accused of presenting false facts and enriching bankers who are Swedish owners. The criticism is intense and politically motivated, opposing the government’s plans (e.g., the car tax) and demanding sensible action. A compromise involving the solutions offered by the government (such as paying taxes earlier) is ruled out because it would not generate additional revenue for the state.
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
It opposes those political parties (including the Social Democrats) who conceal their identity behind electoral alliances, calling this a dishonest practice that distorts election results. It also criticizes the bill's proponents (Rain Epler is mentioned, among others) for their desire to restrict democracy, seeing this as a contradiction to their support for other democratic forms.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The speaker sharply criticizes the government and the Social Democrats (SDE), accusing them of choosing the accelerated path toward national extinction. The criticism is policy-based (cuts to benefits for large families, foreign labor quotas), and the speaker also questions SDE's political consistency regarding the "red line" on voting rights. Furthermore, the speaker references direct damage caused by citizens of the aggressor state (vandalism of cars and cemetery plaques).
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Strong opposition is aimed at the government, Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, and the Minister of Finance, who are accused of poor economic management and disregarding the concerns of entrepreneurs. The criticism is both policy-based and personal, calling into question the economic competence of Jürgen Ligi and the Minister of Finance. No willingness to compromise has been shown, with critics demanding a radical change in direction from the government.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition targets the government's draft legislation, specifically the termination of the universal service and the insufficient exemptions proposed for the car tax (e.g., classic vehicles). The criticism is policy-driven, stressing that the energy crisis was created by a stock market bubble and calling out the exceptional profits made by Eesti Energia. There is also concern that softening the regulations could lead to misuse or abuse ("bad actors").
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The primary criticism is levelled against the governing coalition and its members (the Reform Party, Eesti 200). This criticism targets specific policies (like the car tax) as well as the government’s internal operations and lack of cohesion. The speaker accuses the government of passing the buck to its coalition partners (Eesti 200 concerning migration quotas, and the Reform Party regarding salary hikes).
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at high-ranking government officials (Kaja Kallas, Marko Mihkelson) for their foreign policy statements concerning US domestic politics. The criticism is strategic, stressing that such conduct is dangerous in relation to Estonia's largest military partner, and suggests a breach of diplomatic protocol.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The opposition is directed at the government's proposed car tax bill, criticizing its detrimental economic and regional policy effects. The criticism is policy-based, calling into question the tax's justification and its negative impact on rural communities. The intensity of the opposition is strong, warning that life in the countryside will become impossible.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The main confrontation is directed at the coalition led by the Reform Party and Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, accusing them of making poor economic decisions that are driving the economy into recession. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the negative impact of tax increases (VAT, car tax) and the inefficient management of state finances. They also criticize the government for failing to take out a loan for national defense expenditures, choosing instead to burden citizens with taxes and forcing them to hold multiple jobs.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism targets the government or the parliamentary majority, which systematically rejects bills introduced by the opposition. Emphasis is placed on procedural injustice, which prevents the opposition from either improving existing legislation or creating new laws.
2024-01-23
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary criticism targets the government and the prime minister, who stand accused of pursuing an economy-damaging "tax-the-rich" policy and ignoring the realities on the ground. Legislative rapporteurs are also criticized for obstructing assistance to specific business sectors (such as hauliers) by demanding solutions that are unreasonably complex.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the government and the minister, faulting them both for the protracted handling of the parliamentary inquiry and for ineffective policy, particularly the withdrawal of investments from electricity grids. The criticism is intense and focuses on inaction and the unrealistic planning of the green transition, which fails to take into account the actual condition of the networks.
2024-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
There is not enough data.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at coalition members and committees who reject opposition draft legislation solely on the basis of political affiliation. The objection is both procedural and ethical, accusing the opposing side of a lack of statesmanship and of wasting legislative time. They specifically criticize the pursuit of the "third dimension" (ideology) rather than focusing on substantive issues.