By Plenary Sessions: Mart Maastik

Total Sessions: 8

Fully Profiled: 8

2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, press briefing.
The speaker indicated a readiness for cross-party cooperation, noting that the necessary 81 votes required to amend the constitution are mathematically secured. This suggests a desire to find support outside the coalition in order to pass a specific piece of legislation.
2024-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Not enough data.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
It demonstrates cooperation with their colleague ("Good colleague Varro Vooglaid already provided examples"), referring to the coordinated presentation of arguments during the plenary session. Information regarding the search for cross-party compromise is lacking.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The current style of interaction is confrontational, as the speaker is presenting a direct counter-argument to the colleague's assertion. Although the speaker addresses the chair politely, the communication directed at the colleague is intended solely to refute their position.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
No data available.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrated cooperation with colleagues on the matter, specifically referencing the follow-up to the question concerning demography that was submitted by Varro Vooglaid. There is no information available regarding the search for a compromise between the political parties.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker respectfully addresses the recipient as "dear fellow member of the Economic Commission," which suggests a certain level of interaction within the commission. While the address is polite, the content of the speech itself is challenging and critical, and is not directly aimed at reaching a compromise.
2024-03-04
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker is proposing a solution that they believe would satisfy all parties ("the wolves are fed and the sheep are safe"), specifically by avoiding direct additional taxation of banks while simultaneously preventing the generation of windfall profits. This points to a desire to find a pragmatic solution that doesn't undermine the banks' business model.