By Months: Lauri Läänemets

The style is predominantly aggressive and demanding, especially concerning issues of responsibility and honesty. It employs personal attacks and colorful expressions directed at the ministers ("kelgunöör," "püksid sõeluvad püüli"). When addressing social problems, the tone is critical and solution-oriented, stressing that the situation has reached a critical breaking point. The appeals blend historical facts (coalition negotiations) with a powerful emotional demand for moral accountability.

The rhetoric is combative and insistent, accusing the prime minister of lying ("lied before parliament") and evading responsibility. It employs both emotional examples (specific individuals and families, such as Aili from Türi, a shop assistant) and factual data concerning taxes and the budget to highlight inequality. It demands honesty and accountability from politicians, while simultaneously using sharp expressions ("senseless," "haphazard").

The rhetorical style is predominantly polemical, critical, and emotionally charged, employing a strong moral and ethical framework (e.g., "faceless," "shady lobbying"). The speaker presents arguments through forceful assertions and rhetorical questions, stressing the importance of public interest and justice. It is emphasized that decisions are being made in the business interests of a narrow circle, rather than in the public interest.

The speaker's style is predominantly combative, critical, and insistent, especially when directed at the government and the prime minister. They use strong emotional expressions ("Shame!", "outrageous," "setting a ridiculously low bar") and accuse opponents of corruption and serving narrow business interests. The speaker employs both logical arguments and data, as well as figurative language ("tree plantations," "sweaters mixed up with lemons").

The speaker’s style is predominantly urgent and combative, particularly when discussing labor laws. On this topic, they employ emotional appeals regarding the struggles of average families, using phrases like ("it completely pulls the rug out from under the average family"). However, the tone shifts to be more logical and fact-based when addressing security and energy issues. Here, the speaker repeatedly stresses that the assertions made are "facts" and utilizes an analytical approach concerning costs and timelines. They frequently direct rhetorical questions toward the Prime Minister.

The style is formal, but often sharp and demanding, particularly when addressing the government (e.g., the "cat-and-mouse game"). It employs a strong moral framework, comparing the definition of threats based on group characteristics to the practices of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. Finally, the criticism directed at the Reform Party becomes personal and aggrieved, accusing them of vulgar slander and unethical influence peddling.