By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Lukas

The style of cooperation is cautiously critical, referencing previous education agreements but noting their shortcomings (specifically, the disregard for vocational education teachers). A solution is proposed by their own party (Isamaa) concerning salary guarantees for young teachers, which demonstrates a readiness to offer alternatives.

The speaker referenced cooperation with colleagues in the opposition, specifically mentioning the question raised by Urmas Reinsalu concerning the Pihlakodu case. He also highlighted the party's (Isamaa) plan to launch a discussion in the Tartu City Council, which would involve inviting the relevant authorities. There is no information available regarding the search for compromises with non-governmental parties.

The speaker stresses the importance of cooperation and compromise in finalizing the legislation, while acknowledging colleagues (such as Margit Sutrop) and relevant sectoral organizations (the Choir Association, the Folk Dance Society). They also referenced learning from the experiences of the Baltic states (Latvia and Lithuania) and the necessity of achieving coordination and "brotherly peace" within the academic community.

There is not enough data.

The cooperative style emphasizes international solidarity with Finland, highlighting the common stance of Finnish political parties (including the Social Democrats) regarding the continued use of anti-personnel mines. The speaker views the connection with Finland as a "brotherhood in arms" that should be upheld. Information regarding domestic inter-party cooperation is unavailable.

The speeches reveal that the speaker is cooperating with their political party (Isamaa), jointly submitting amendments. There is no indication of openness to compromise with the governing coalition or of seeking bilateral cooperation. The style is rather confrontational and demanding.

There is not enough data.

The speaker stresses the necessity of cooperation and negotiation with local municipalities, preferring agreements over imposition by legislative force, especially concerning the takeover of upper secondary schools. The submission of six coordinated questions by the Isamaa faction is mentioned, pointing to internal cooperation within the faction.