By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

The political stance is one of strong opposition, focusing on the government's incompetence and procedural errors (e.g., rushing legislation and ignoring proposals). Key issues include the underfunding of local municipalities, ensuring food security through primary producers, and fiscal responsibility (opposition to tax increases and the vague initiatives of the Just Transition Fund). The speaker defends the positions of their parliamentary group (EKRE) and accuses the government of populism.

The political focus is directed toward the technical details of economic and tax laws, especially concerning the pension system and VAT thresholds. The speaker emphasizes the need to reduce bureaucracy and simplify financial transactions, such as moving pension assets between pillars. The stance is policy-based, seeking clarity and efficiency in the draft legislation.

The political stance aims to clarify the norms governing international diplomacy and the location of embassies, while simultaneously supporting a specific draft bill. Domestically, the speaker criticizes the procedural lack of transparency in the Riigikogu (Parliament), questioning the justification for the voting requirements (51 votes). The positions taken are primarily policy- and procedure-based.

The political focus centers on ensuring clarity and practical feasibility in implementing legislation, particularly concerning crisis management and renewable energy. There is moderate skepticism regarding the wholesale adoption of European Union terminology (e.g., "formaalõpe" [formal education]), with a preference for clear Estonian concepts (such as "tasemeõpe" [level-based education]). The primary issues revolve around refining regulations and enhancing citizen engagement.

The political position is strongly opposed to the government, and particularly the Minister of the Interior, emphasizing the administration's inaction and incompetence. The speaker questions how long the people must endure such a government, focusing on issues of security (the Narva buoys) and historical memory (Lihula, Sinimäed, the Bronze Soldier). The opposition is intense and based on criticism of the government's performance.

The politician strongly opposes the government's environmental and energy policies, specifically the suspension of the processing of oil shale mining permits, deeming this anti-business and procedurally flawed. Key issues also include national defense (aid to Ukraine, the Defence League) and social policy (kindergarten fees). Criticism is aimed at the government's actions and failed procedures, demanding an assessment of the socio-economic impact.

The speaker strongly opposes the government’s education policy, questioning Minister Kristina Kallas’s competence based on her previous decisions. The core issue is the centralization and reduction of educational opportunities, particularly in rural areas. The stance is highly confrontational and outcome-based, criticizing earlier decisions (the closure of rural schools and the scaling back of vocational education).