By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

Total Sessions: 7

Fully Profiled: 7

2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The rhetorical style is critical and combative, employing strong language (e.g., "a complete mess," "incompetence," "insanity"). The appeals are primarily logical and fact-based, referencing specific figures and legal statutes, but these are interwoven with sharp political criticism aimed at opponents. Figurative language is utilized (e.g., "they are piling stones into entrepreneurs' backpacks and then whipping them as well") alongside rhetorical questions.
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The speaking style is highly formal and interrogative, concentrating on obtaining logical explanations and providing technical solutions. The presenter maintains a neutral tone, respectfully addressing those giving the reports and posing questions aimed at achieving clarity and reducing bureaucracy. There are no emotional appeals or narratives; the focus remains strictly on details and procedures.
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The style is formal and respectful ("esteemed presiding officer"), yet simultaneously sharply questioning, particularly regarding procedural decisions. The speaker employs logical arguments and seeks clarification, emphasizing the need for a broader understanding of international norms and the justification of internal decisions. The tone is predominantly analytical and scrutinizing.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The discourse is formal, analytical, and inquisitive, focusing on logical arguments and legal details. The tone is predominantly neutral, but becomes critical when addressing ambiguous terms or potential digital exclusion. The style is aimed at obtaining explanations and clarifications, rather than emotional persuasion.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The rhetorical style is highly combative, accusatory, and emotionally charged, relying on extensive lists detailing government failures. Sharp rhetorical questions ("What else needs to happen?") and irony are employed to underscore the gravity of the situation and incite public outrage. The tone remains formal, but the content is sharply critical.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The tone is critical, factual, and at times emotional, particularly regarding the oil shale issue, where personal connection to the industry is stressed ("brought bread to the family table"). The style is formal, utilizing logical arguments (procedural errors, EIA costs) and repeatedly posing sharp rhetorical questions to the minister. The draft law is explicitly called "anti-business" and "imposed," emphasizing the negative impact of rushing it through.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is critical and combative, utilizing rhetorical questions and veiled sarcasm, thereby calling the minister's competence into question. The address is formal (directed at the session chair and the respondent), but its content is sharply oppositional and emotionally charged, emphasizing the damage inflicted upon rural areas.