By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller
Total Sessions: 7
Fully Profiled: 7
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Strongly supports reducing the tax burden for primary producers (lowering VAT on fruits and vegetables) and the financing of local governments. It criticizes the government’s expenditure on administrative activities and soft measures (JTF), deeming them wasteful. It argues that the state assigns responsibilities to local municipalities (KOVs) without providing the necessary funding, thereby increasing their burden.
2024-09-24
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
Economic views emphasize the simplification of the tax system and the reduction of bureaucracy, supporting, for example, raising the VAT registration threshold above 40,000 euros. The speaker seeks clarity regarding the tax rates for the business account and advocates for efficient solutions when transferring financial assets.
2024-09-23
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
There is too little data.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Not enough data. (The acceleration of renewable energy adoption and waste management are addressed, but there are no positions regarding taxes, budgetary discipline, or economic growth.)
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
No data available.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
Strongly supports the interests and confidence of entrepreneurs, opposing the regulation that halts permit processing and creates uncertainty. It demands that the government compensate the costs incurred by entrepreneurs who have already begun environmental impact assessments. It criticizes the government's actions, which damage the regional economy and employment, and inquires about the Environmental Board's cutback plans.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The economic arguments are implicit, hinting at criticism concerning the relationship between school closures and funding, and ironically questioning whether closing more schools will actually result in additional money. The speaker opposes cuts that diminish the regional education infrastructure, prioritizing the preservation of local services.